TO ALL. 写patch的时候请考虑全面, 不要头痛医头.
-systemctl status firewalld | grep -q "running" && { +command -v firewall-cmd > /dev/null || { + echo "firewalld.service could not be found" + exit 0
That makes this script depending on firewalld. We should behave equally well without it. 下面的防火墙规则, 有需要执行的吗? 在没有firewalld的时候. Thanks, Fengguang
+} + +systemctl start firewalld +[ "$(systemctl is-active firewalld)" == "active" ] || { + echo "start firewalld.service failed" + exit 0 +}
- DOCKER0_IFACE=docker0 - DOCKER0_SUBNET=172.17.0.0/16 +DOCKER0_IFACE=docker0 +DOCKER0_SUBNET=172.17.0.0/16
- iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $PUB_IFACE -s $DOCKER0_SUBNET -j MASQUERADE - iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $DOCKER0_IFACE -d $DOCKER0_SUBNET -j MASQUERADE +iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $PUB_IFACE -s $DOCKER0_SUBNET -j MASQUERADE +iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $DOCKER0_IFACE -d $DOCKER0_SUBNET -j MASQUERADE
- firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-rich-rule="rule family=ipv4 source address=$DOCKER0_SUBNET accept" - firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-rich-rule="rule family=ipv4 source address=$BR0_SUBNET accept" - firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-rich-rule="rule family=ipv4 source address=0.0.0.0/32 accept" -} +firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-rich-rule="rule family=ipv4 source address=$DOCKER0_SUBNET accept" +firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-rich-rule="rule family=ipv4 source address=$BR0_SUBNET accept" +firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-rich-rule="rule family=ipv4 source address=0.0.0.0/32 accept" -- 2.23.0