[PATCH lkp-tests 1/2] jobs/iozone.yaml: add specified block_size parameter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbac7/fbac7fd6250319304893cf8539b296043fb7b226" alt=""
[why] need to test different block_size value Signed-off-by: Lu Kaiyi <2392863668@qq.com> --- jobs/iozone.yaml | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/jobs/iozone.yaml b/jobs/iozone.yaml index f281186b..d17137e8 100644 --- a/jobs/iozone.yaml +++ b/jobs/iozone.yaml @@ -1,13 +1,17 @@ suite: iozone testcase: iozone category: benchmark +block_size: +- 64k +- 256k +- 1m +- 4m +- 16m -disk: 2HDD +disk: 1HDD fs: -- xfs - ext4 -- btrfs iosched: - kyber -- 2.23.0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74b5e/74b5e86e21fea6904bedf49e01ecce1ff69fe5e1" alt=""
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 03:49:12PM +0800, Lu Kaiyi wrote:
[why] need to test different block_size value
Why change the other fields? The fs change looks not good. Please think in more general POV, not just our demands. Thanks, Fengguang
Signed-off-by: Lu Kaiyi <2392863668@qq.com> --- jobs/iozone.yaml | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/jobs/iozone.yaml b/jobs/iozone.yaml index f281186b..d17137e8 100644 --- a/jobs/iozone.yaml +++ b/jobs/iozone.yaml @@ -1,13 +1,17 @@ suite: iozone testcase: iozone category: benchmark +block_size: +- 64k +- 256k +- 1m +- 4m +- 16m
-disk: 2HDD +disk: 1HDD
fs: -- xfs - ext4 -- btrfs iosched: - kyber
-- 2.23.0
participants (2)
-
Lu Kaiyi
-
Wu Fengguang