同意永乐的观点。 具体建议： 1. PR中应该说明为什么candidate有能力作为maintainer 2. 有两个/lgtm，然后再/approve
-----Original Message----- From: Fred Li [mailto:yongle.li@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 11:31 AM To: community <community@openeuler.org>; Liyongle via Dev <dev@openeuler.org> Cc: infra <infra@openeuler.org>; tc <tc@openeuler.org> Subject: [Tc] [Docs]Please check the 2 PRs for the same(perhaps) purpose
Hi Docs team, community,
To add one committer to Docs team,
@amyMaYun submitted [1], and I put -1 comment with reason, but I haven't got any reply so far.
@Rudy_Tan submitted another one [2], and it got approved immediately.
I am not against the nominated committer himself/herself, but I am against the process.
I propos to revert [2] if there is not a reasonalbe explanation.
[1] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/321 [2] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/300
-- Regards Fred Li (李永乐) _______________________________________________ Tc mailing list -- tc@openeuler.org To unsubscribe send an email to tc-leave@openeuler.org