From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.11-rc1 commit 9f1e16fb1fc9826001c69e0551d51fbbcd2d74e9 category: feature bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/8335 CVE: NA Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- We get the size of the trampoline image during the dry run phase and allocate memory based on that size. The allocated image will then be populated with instructions during the real patch phase. But after commit 26ef208c209a ("bpf: Use arch_bpf_trampoline_size"), the `im` argument is inconsistent in the dry run and real patch phase. This may cause emit_imm in RV64 to generate a different number of instructions when generating the 'im' address, potentially causing out-of-bounds issues. Let's emit the maximum number of instructions for the "im" address during dry run to fix this problem. Fixes: 26ef208c209a ("bpf: Use arch_bpf_trampoline_size") Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240622030437.3973492-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com Conflicts: arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c [Fix conflict because of context diff.] Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com> --- arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 4ae7e6e7c061..a509fab76c84 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ #define RV_FENTRY_NINSNS 2 #define RV_FENTRY_NBYTES (RV_FENTRY_NINSNS * 4) +/* imm that allows emit_imm to emit max count insns */ +#define RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM 0x7FFF7FF7FF7FF7FF #define RV_REG_TCC RV_REG_A6 #define RV_REG_TCC_SAVED RV_REG_S6 /* Store A6 in S6 if program do calls */ @@ -922,7 +924,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, orig_call += RV_FENTRY_NINSNS * 4; if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) { - emit_imm(RV_REG_A0, (const s64)im, ctx); + emit_imm(RV_REG_A0, ctx->insns ? (const s64)im : RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM, ctx); ret = emit_call((const u64)__bpf_tramp_enter, true, ctx); if (ret) return ret; @@ -983,7 +985,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) { im->ip_epilogue = ctx->insns + ctx->ninsns; - emit_imm(RV_REG_A0, (const s64)im, ctx); + emit_imm(RV_REG_A0, ctx->insns ? (const s64)im : RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM, ctx); ret = emit_call((const u64)__bpf_tramp_exit, true, ctx); if (ret) goto out; @@ -1052,6 +1054,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, { int ret; struct rv_jit_context ctx; + u32 size = image_end - image; ctx.ninsns = 0; /* @@ -1065,11 +1068,16 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, ctx.ro_insns = image; ret = __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(im, m, tlinks, func_addr, flags, &ctx); if (ret < 0) - return ret; + goto out; - bpf_flush_icache(ctx.insns, ctx.insns + ctx.ninsns); + if (WARN_ON(size < ninsns_rvoff(ctx.ninsns))) { + ret = -E2BIG; + goto out; + } - return ninsns_rvoff(ret); + bpf_flush_icache(image, image_end); +out: + return ret < 0 ? ret : size; } int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx, -- 2.34.1