data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08bd7/08bd75d7a660a8fe64a16d5f42ee2948549a203d" alt=""
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.112 commit 9a5a4d23e24d39784b643e5db2e4c3a97da4a1ac category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5HL0X Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit c54bc0fc84214b203f7a0ebfd1bd308ce2abe920 upstream. When the timer base is empty, base::next_expiry is set to base::clk + NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA and base::next_expiry_recalc is false. When no timer is queued until jiffies reaches base::next_expiry value, the warning for not finding any expired timer and base::next_expiry_recalc is false in __run_timers() triggers. To prevent triggering the warning in this valid scenario base::timers_pending needs to be added to the warning condition. Fixes: 31cd0e119d50 ("timers: Recalculate next timer interrupt only when necessary") Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220405191732.7438-3-anna-maria@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> --- kernel/time/timer.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c index 351420c23064..f7d3a108e27c 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timer.c +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c @@ -1738,11 +1738,14 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base) time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) { levels = collect_expired_timers(base, heads); /* - * The only possible reason for not finding any expired - * timer at this clk is that all matching timers have been - * dequeued. + * The two possible reasons for not finding any expired + * timer at this clk are that all matching timers have been + * dequeued or no timer has been queued since + * base::next_expiry was set to base::clk + + * NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA. */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(!levels && !base->next_expiry_recalc); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!levels && !base->next_expiry_recalc + && base->timers_pending); base->clk++; base->next_expiry = __next_timer_interrupt(base); -- 2.20.1