From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.12-rc1 commit 7d2180d9d943d31491d77e336557f33670cfe7fd category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IDC9YK Reference: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commi... -------------------------------- Turns out the core_sched bits forgot to use the set_next_task(.first=true) variant. Notably: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224015.614146342@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Zicheng Qu <quzicheng@huawei.com> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++-- kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index f3085e18557f..04626decd730 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -6051,7 +6051,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) next = rq->core_pick; if (next != prev) { put_prev_task(rq, prev); - set_next_task(rq, next); + set_next_task_first(rq, next); } rq->core_pick = NULL; @@ -6225,7 +6225,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) } out_set_next: - set_next_task(rq, next); + set_next_task_first(rq, next); out: if (rq->core->core_forceidle_count && next == rq->idle) queue_core_balance(rq); diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index f0e385c168de..80ccf379c6d4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -2598,6 +2598,10 @@ static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next) next->sched_class->set_next_task(rq, next, false); } +static inline void set_next_task_first(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next) +{ + next->sched_class->set_next_task(rq, next, true); +} /* * Helper to define a sched_class instance; each one is placed in a separate -- 2.34.1