data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08bd7/08bd75d7a660a8fe64a16d5f42ee2948549a203d" alt=""
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.121 commit 46054583988335df39a54862554a8952a69c5649 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5L6CQ Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 63678eecec57fc51b778be3da35a397931287170 ] gcc 12 does not (always) optimize away code that should only be generated if parameters are constant and within in a certain range. This depends on various obscure kernel config options, however in particular PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES can trigger this compile error: In function ‘__atomic_add_const’, inlined from ‘__preempt_count_add.part.0’ at ./arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h:50:3: ./arch/s390/include/asm/atomic_ops.h:80:9: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’ 80 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ Workaround this by simply disabling the optimization for PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES, since the kernel will be so slow, that this optimization won't matter at all. Reported-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> --- arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h index b5f545db461a..60e101b8460c 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h @@ -46,10 +46,17 @@ static inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void) static inline void __preempt_count_add(int val) { - if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && (val >= -128) && (val <= 127)) - __atomic_add_const(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count); - else - __atomic_add(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count); + /* + * With some obscure config options and CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES + * enabled, gcc 12 fails to handle __builtin_constant_p(). + */ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES)) { + if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && (val >= -128) && (val <= 127)) { + __atomic_add_const(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count); + return; + } + } + __atomic_add(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count); } static inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val) -- 2.20.1