From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.116 commit 08cb3dc9d2b44f153d0bcf2cb966e4a94b5d0f32 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/ID6BAQ CVE: CVE-2025-40123 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 4540aed51b12bc13364149bf95f6ecef013197c0 ] Yinhao et al. recently reported: Our fuzzer tool discovered an uninitialized pointer issue in the bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() function within the Linux kernel's BPF subsystem. This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when a BPF program attempts to deference the txq member of struct xdp_buff object. The test initializes two programs of BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP: progA acts as the entry point for bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() and its expected_attach_type can neither be of be BPF_XDP_DEVMAP nor BPF_XDP_CPUMAP. progA calls into a slot of a tailcall map it owns. progB's expected_attach_type must be BPF_XDP_DEVMAP to pass xdp_is_valid_access() validation. The program returns struct xdp_md's egress_ifindex, and the latter is only allowed to be accessed under mentioned expected_attach_type. progB is then inserted into the tailcall which progA calls. The underlying issue goes beyond XDP though. Another example are programs of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR. sock_addr_is_valid_access() as well as sock_addr_func_proto() have different logic depending on the programs' expected_attach_type. Similarly, a program attached to BPF_CGROUP_INET4_GETPEERNAME should not be allowed doing a tailcall into a program which calls bpf_bind() out of BPF which is only enabled for BPF_CGROUP_INET4_CONNECT. In short, specifying expected_attach_type allows to open up additional functionality or restrictions beyond what the basic bpf_prog_type enables. The use of tailcalls must not violate these constraints. Fix it by enforcing expected_attach_type in __bpf_prog_map_compatible(). Note that we only enforce this for tailcall maps, but not for BPF devmaps or cpumaps: There, the programs are invoked through dev_map_bpf_prog_run*() and cpu_map_bpf_prog_run*() which set up a new environment / context and therefore these situations are not prone to this issue. Fixes: 5e43f899b03a ("bpf: Check attach type at prog load time") Reported-by: Yinhao Hu <dddddd@hust.edu.cn> Reported-by: Kaiyan Mei <M202472210@hust.edu.cn> Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250926171201.188490-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda2@huawei.com> --- include/linux/bpf.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 7fe4e77d3405..c9f81962d9f9 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ struct bpf_map_owner { bool xdp_has_frags; u64 storage_cookie[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE]; const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto; + enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type; }; struct bpf_map { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index db31c91dccf3..17f0df3dae00 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -2288,6 +2288,7 @@ bool bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map, map->owner->type = prog_type; map->owner->jited = fp->jited; map->owner->xdp_has_frags = aux->xdp_has_frags; + map->owner->expected_attach_type = fp->expected_attach_type; map->owner->attach_func_proto = aux->attach_func_proto; for_each_cgroup_storage_type(i) { map->owner->storage_cookie[i] = @@ -2299,6 +2300,10 @@ bool bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map, ret = map->owner->type == prog_type && map->owner->jited == fp->jited && map->owner->xdp_has_frags == aux->xdp_has_frags; + if (ret && + map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY && + map->owner->expected_attach_type != fp->expected_attach_type) + ret = false; for_each_cgroup_storage_type(i) { if (!ret) break; -- 2.34.1