From: Pietro Borrello <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.2-rc5 commit b12fece4c64857e5fab4290bf01b2e0317a88456 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I6IFV4 CVE: CVE-2023-1073 ---------------------------------------- Add a check for empty report_list in hid_validate_values(). The missing check causes a type confusion when issuing a list_entry() on an empty report_list. The problem is caused by the assumption that the device must have valid report_list. While this will be true for all normal HID devices, a suitably malicious device can violate the assumption. Fixes: 1b15d2e5b807 ("HID: core: fix validation of report id 0") Signed-off-by: Pietro Borrello <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Lin Yujun <linyujun809@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com> --- drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c index 4f6d676c4224..e70ac6d16ea8 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c @@ -974,8 +974,8 @@ struct hid_report *hid_validate_values(struct hid_device *hid, * Validating on id 0 means we should examine the first * report in the list. */ - report = list_entry( - hid->report_enum[type].report_list.next, + report = list_first_entry_or_null( + &hid->report_enum[type].report_list, struct hid_report, list); } else { report = hid->report_enum[type].report_id_hash[id]; -- 2.25.1