data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08bd7/08bd75d7a660a8fe64a16d5f42ee2948549a203d" alt=""
From: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.90 commit a0e82d5ef992eed30d49f7855eed89773a620ddd bugzilla: 186168 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4SHY1 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit d7f55471db2719629f773c2d6b5742a69595bfd3 ] Fix modpost Section mismatch error in memblock_phys_alloc() [...] WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x1dcc): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_phys_alloc() to the function .init.text:memblock_phys_alloc_range() The function memblock_phys_alloc() references the function __init memblock_phys_alloc_range(). This is often because memblock_phys_alloc lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of memblock_phys_alloc_range is wrong. ERROR: modpost: Section mismatches detected. Set CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY=y to allow them. [...] memblock_phys_alloc() is a one-line wrapper, make it __always_inline to avoid these section mismatches. Reported-by: k2ci <kernel-bot@kylinos.cn> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> [rppt: slightly massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217020754.2874872-1-liu.yun@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> --- include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index 629bf7de021b..5b9b0239e34a 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -394,8 +394,8 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t end, int nid, bool exact_nid); phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid); -static inline phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc(phys_addr_t size, - phys_addr_t align) +static __always_inline phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc(phys_addr_t size, + phys_addr_t align) { return memblock_phys_alloc_range(size, align, 0, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE); -- 2.20.1