From: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.110 commit 5c94b6205e87411dbe9dc1ca088eb36b8837fb47 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5661B CVE: CVE-2022-1516 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 7781607938c8371d4c2b243527430241c62e39c2 ] When the link layer is terminating, x25->neighbour will be set to NULL in x25_disconnect(). As a result, it could cause null-ptr-deref bugs in x25_sendmsg(),x25_recvmsg() and x25_connect(). One of the bugs is shown below. (Thread 1) | (Thread 2) x25_link_terminated() | x25_recvmsg() x25_kill_by_neigh() | ... x25_disconnect() | lock_sock(sk) ... | ... x25->neighbour = NULL //(1) | ... | x25->neighbour->extended //(2) The code sets NULL to x25->neighbour in position (1) and dereferences x25->neighbour in position (2), which could cause null-ptr-deref bug. This patch adds lock_sock() in x25_kill_by_neigh() in order to synchronize with x25_sendmsg(), x25_recvmsg() and x25_connect(). What`s more, the sock held by lock_sock() is not NULL, because it is extracted from x25_list and uses x25_list_lock to synchronize. Fixes: 4becb7ee5b3d ("net/x25: Fix x25_neigh refcnt leak when x25 disconnect") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> Reviewed-by: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Baisong Zhong <zhongbaisong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> --- net/x25/af_x25.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c index 03ed170b8125..d231d4620c38 100644 --- a/net/x25/af_x25.c +++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c @@ -1775,10 +1775,15 @@ void x25_kill_by_neigh(struct x25_neigh *nb) write_lock_bh(&x25_list_lock); - sk_for_each(s, &x25_list) - if (x25_sk(s)->neighbour == nb) + sk_for_each(s, &x25_list) { + if (x25_sk(s)->neighbour == nb) { + write_unlock_bh(&x25_list_lock); + lock_sock(s); x25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH, 0, 0); - + release_sock(s); + write_lock_bh(&x25_list_lock); + } + } write_unlock_bh(&x25_list_lock); /* Remove any related forwards */ -- 2.20.1