data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15b73/15b73ab168071c52865aa6924e2d29ca1a6e3887" alt=""
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.9-rc1 commit bc2ff4cbc3294c01f29449405c42ee26ee0e1f59 category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I9R3AY CVE: NA Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- Use free_unref_page_batch() to free the folios. This may increase the number of IPIs from calling try_to_unmap_flush() more often, but that's going to be very workload-dependent. It may even reduce the number of IPIs as we now batch-free large folios instead of freeing them one at a time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-12-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> --- mm/vmscan.c | 20 +++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 34614bb7062d..f3ed46d5c7d7 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1711,14 +1711,15 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc, struct reclaim_stat *stat, bool ignore_references) { + struct folio_batch free_folios; LIST_HEAD(ret_folios); - LIST_HEAD(free_folios); LIST_HEAD(demote_folios); unsigned int nr_reclaimed = 0; unsigned int pgactivate = 0; bool do_demote_pass; struct swap_iocb *plug = NULL; + folio_batch_init(&free_folios); memset(stat, 0, sizeof(*stat)); cond_resched(); do_demote_pass = can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc); @@ -2134,14 +2135,11 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, */ nr_reclaimed += nr_pages; - /* - * Is there need to periodically free_folio_list? It would - * appear not as the counts should be low - */ - if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio))) - destroy_large_folio(folio); - else - list_add(&folio->lru, &free_folios); + if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) { + mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios); + try_to_unmap_flush(); + free_unref_folios(&free_folios); + } continue; activate_locked_split: @@ -2205,9 +2203,9 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, pgactivate = stat->nr_activate[0] + stat->nr_activate[1]; - mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(&free_folios); + mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios); try_to_unmap_flush(); - free_unref_page_list(&free_folios); + free_unref_folios(&free_folios); list_splice(&ret_folios, folio_list); count_vm_events(PGACTIVATE, pgactivate); -- 2.25.1