data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/464d2/464d244606e3ae55f23eaa44122af52dbbc85c55" alt=""
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.226 commit c60676b81fab456b672796830f6d8057058f029c category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAU9NE CVE: CVE-2024-46840 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit b8ccef048354074a548f108e51d0557d6adfd3a3 ] In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient incorrect answer. In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could happen if we have extent tree corruption. Change that to return -EUCLEAN. In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly, however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code. Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert that to proper error handling. Also adjust the error message so we can actually do something with the information. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Conflicts: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c [Context difference.] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 854c7fa0fc06..12d2923da2b4 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -4808,7 +4808,15 @@ static noinline void reada_walk_down(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, /* We don't care about errors in readahead. */ if (ret < 0) continue; - BUG_ON(refs == 0); + + /* + * This could be racey, it's conceivable that we raced and end + * up with a bogus refs count, if that's the case just skip, if + * we are actually corrupt we will notice when we look up + * everything again with our locks. + */ + if (refs == 0) + continue; if (wc->stage == DROP_REFERENCE) { if (refs == 1) @@ -4874,7 +4882,11 @@ static noinline int walk_down_proc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, &wc->flags[level]); if (ret) return ret; - BUG_ON(wc->refs[level] == 0); + if (unlikely(wc->refs[level] == 0)) { + btrfs_err(fs_info, "bytenr %llu has 0 references, expect > 0", + eb->start); + return -EUCLEAN; + } } if (wc->stage == DROP_REFERENCE) { @@ -5007,8 +5019,9 @@ static noinline int do_walk_down(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, goto out_unlock; if (unlikely(wc->refs[level - 1] == 0)) { - btrfs_err(fs_info, "Missing references."); - ret = -EIO; + btrfs_err(fs_info, "bytenr %llu has 0 references, expect > 0", + bytenr); + ret = -EUCLEAN; goto out_unlock; } *lookup_info = 0; @@ -5210,7 +5223,12 @@ static noinline int walk_up_proc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, path->locks[level] = 0; return ret; } - BUG_ON(wc->refs[level] == 0); + if (unlikely(wc->refs[level] == 0)) { + btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(eb, path->locks[level]); + btrfs_err(fs_info, "bytenr %llu has 0 references, expect > 0", + eb->start); + return -EUCLEAN; + } if (wc->refs[level] == 1) { btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(eb, path->locks[level]); path->locks[level] = 0; -- 2.31.1