data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb91/1cb91e2fccf68de78175232f4d3463e4add8f333" alt=""
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> stable inclusion from linux-4.19.172 commit a4649185a98eb7adbdbdfdbf61237d518861e877 CVE: CVE-2021-3347 -------------------------------- commit f2dac39d93987f7de1e20b3988c8685523247ae2 upstream Too many gotos already and an upcoming fix would make it even more unreadable. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> --- kernel/futex.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index ac252985af06..fc8d3f059b5e 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -2370,18 +2370,13 @@ static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q) spin_unlock(q->lock_ptr); } -static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, - struct task_struct *argowner) +static int __fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, + struct task_struct *argowner) { + u32 uval, uninitialized_var(curval), newval, newtid; struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state; - u32 uval, uninitialized_var(curval), newval; struct task_struct *oldowner, *newowner; - u32 newtid; - int ret, err = 0; - - lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr); - - raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + int err = 0; oldowner = pi_state->owner; @@ -2415,14 +2410,12 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, * We raced against a concurrent self; things are * already fixed up. Nothing to do. */ - ret = 0; - goto out_unlock; + return 0; } if (__rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&pi_state->pi_mutex)) { /* We got the lock. pi_state is correct. Tell caller. */ - ret = 1; - goto out_unlock; + return 1; } /* @@ -2437,8 +2430,7 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, * We raced against a concurrent self; things are * already fixed up. Nothing to do. */ - ret = 1; - goto out_unlock; + return 1; } newowner = argowner; } @@ -2469,7 +2461,6 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, * itself. */ pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, newowner); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); return argowner == current; @@ -2492,17 +2483,16 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, switch (err) { case -EFAULT: - ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr); + err = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr); break; case -EAGAIN: cond_resched(); - ret = 0; + err = 0; break; default: WARN_ON_ONCE(1); - ret = err; break; } @@ -2512,17 +2502,26 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, /* * Check if someone else fixed it for us: */ - if (pi_state->owner != oldowner) { - ret = argowner == current; - goto out_unlock; - } + if (pi_state->owner != oldowner) + return argowner == current; - if (ret) - goto out_unlock; + /* Retry if err was -EAGAIN or the fault in succeeded */ + if (!err) + goto retry; - goto retry; + return err; +} -out_unlock: +static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, + struct task_struct *argowner) +{ + struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state; + int ret; + + lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr); + + raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); + ret = __fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, argowner); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); return ret; } -- 2.25.1