From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.110 commit cc051f497eac9d8a0d816cd4bffa3415f2724871 bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I574AL Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 15729ff8143f8135b03988a100a19e66d7cb7ecd ] A crash [1] happened to be triggered in conjunction with commit 2d52c58b9c9b ("block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges"). The latter was then reverted by commit ebc69e897e17 ("Revert "block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges""). Yet, the reverted commit was not the one introducing the bug. In fact, it actually triggered a UAF introduced by a different commit, and now fixed by commit d29bd41428cf ("block, bfq: reset last_bfqq_created on group change"). So, there is no point in keeping commit 2d52c58b9c9b ("block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges") out. This commit restores it. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214503 Reported-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211125181510.15004-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 940184335104..195ab5219736 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2542,6 +2542,15 @@ bfq_setup_merge(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) * are likely to increase the throughput. */ bfqq->new_bfqq = new_bfqq; + /* + * The above assignment schedules the following redirections: + * each time some I/O for bfqq arrives, the process that + * generated that I/O is disassociated from bfqq and + * associated with new_bfqq. Here we increases new_bfqq->ref + * in advance, adding the number of processes that are + * expected to be associated with new_bfqq as they happen to + * issue I/O. + */ new_bfqq->ref += process_refs; return new_bfqq; } @@ -2601,6 +2610,10 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, { struct bfq_queue *in_service_bfqq, *new_bfqq; + /* if a merge has already been setup, then proceed with that first */ + if (bfqq->new_bfqq) + return bfqq->new_bfqq; + /* * Do not perform queue merging if the device is non * rotational and performs internal queueing. In fact, such a @@ -2655,9 +2668,6 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, if (bfq_too_late_for_merging(bfqq)) return NULL; - if (bfqq->new_bfqq) - return bfqq->new_bfqq; - if (!io_struct || unlikely(bfqq == &bfqd->oom_bfqq)) return NULL; -- 2.20.1