From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-5.10.62 commit 26ee94ba343c63d9d23112521c68fa72c82a8805 bugzilla: 182217 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4EFOS Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit c797b40ccc340b8a66f7a7842aecc90bf749f087 ] Inside blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() we already grabbed request's refcount before calling ->fn(), so needn't to grab it one more time in blk_mq_check_expired(). Meantime remove extra request expire check in blk_mq_check_expired(). Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811155202.629575-1-ming.lei@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com> Acked-by: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com> --- block/blk-mq.c | 30 +++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 2840cc4897c9..23050fe884cb 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -940,34 +940,14 @@ static bool blk_mq_check_expired(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long *next = priv; /* - * Just do a quick check if it is expired before locking the request in - * so we're not unnecessarilly synchronizing across CPUs. - */ - if (!blk_mq_req_expired(rq, next)) - return true; - - /* - * We have reason to believe the request may be expired. Take a - * reference on the request to lock this request lifetime into its - * currently allocated context to prevent it from being reallocated in - * the event the completion by-passes this timeout handler. - * - * If the reference was already released, then the driver beat the - * timeout handler to posting a natural completion. - */ - if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref)) - return true; - - /* - * The request is now locked and cannot be reallocated underneath the - * timeout handler's processing. Re-verify this exact request is truly - * expired; if it is not expired, then the request was completed and - * reallocated as a new request. + * blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() has locked the request, so it cannot + * be reallocated underneath the timeout handler's processing, then + * the expire check is reliable. If the request is not expired, then + * it was completed and reallocated as a new request after returning + * from blk_mq_check_expired(). */ if (blk_mq_req_expired(rq, next)) blk_mq_rq_timed_out(rq, reserved); - - blk_mq_put_rq_ref(rq); return true; } -- 2.20.1