From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.14-rc1 commit 7b755570064fcb9cde37afd48f6bc65151097ba7 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IBC4T0 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- In the __GFP_COMP case, we already pass the gfp_flags to prep_new_page()->post_alloc_hook(). However, in the !__GFP_COMP case, we essentially pass only hardcoded __GFP_MOVABLE to post_alloc_hook(), preventing some action modifiers from being effective.. Let's pass our now properly adjusted gfp flags there as well. This way, we can now support __GFP_ZERO for alloc_contig_*(). As a side effect, we now also support __GFP_SKIP_ZERO and__GFP_ZEROTAGS; but we'll keep the more special stuff (KASAN, NOLOCKDEP) disabled for now. It's worth noting that with __GFP_ZERO, we might unnecessarily zero pages when we have to release part of our range using free_contig_range() again. This can be optimized in the future, if ever required; the caller we'll be converting (powernv/memtrace) next won't trigger this. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241203094732.200195-6-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: mm/page_alloc.c [Context conflicts.] Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com> --- mm/page_alloc.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index f1901eaf711f..eaae4051f2c7 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -6683,7 +6683,7 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(struct compact_control *cc, return (ret < 0) ? ret : 0; } -static void split_free_pages(struct list_head *list) +static void split_free_pages(struct list_head *list, gfp_t gfp_mask) { int order; @@ -6694,7 +6694,7 @@ static void split_free_pages(struct list_head *list) list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, &list[order], lru) { int i; - post_alloc_hook(page, order, __GFP_MOVABLE); + post_alloc_hook(page, order, gfp_mask); if (!order) continue; @@ -6711,7 +6711,8 @@ static void split_free_pages(struct list_head *list) static int __alloc_contig_verify_gfp_mask(gfp_t gfp_mask, gfp_t *gfp_cc_mask) { const gfp_t reclaim_mask = __GFP_IO | __GFP_FS | __GFP_RECLAIM; - const gfp_t action_mask = __GFP_COMP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN; + const gfp_t action_mask = __GFP_COMP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN | + __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_ZEROTAGS | __GFP_SKIP_ZERO; const gfp_t cc_action_mask = __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN; /* @@ -6869,7 +6870,7 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, } if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP)) { - split_free_pages(cc.freepages); + split_free_pages(cc.freepages, gfp_mask); /* Free head and tail (if any) */ if (start != outer_start) -- 2.43.0