From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.93 commit 1f912f8484e9c4396378c39460bbea0af681f319 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/ICDJOC CVE: CVE-2025-38003 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit dac5e6249159ac255dad9781793dbe5908ac9ddb upstream. When the procfs content is generated for a bcm_op which is in the process to be removed the procfs output might show unreliable data (UAF). As the removal of bcm_op's is already implemented with rcu handling this patch adds the missing rcu_read_lock() and makes sure the list entries are properly removed under rcu protection. Fixes: f1b4e32aca08 ("can: bcm: use call_rcu() instead of costly synchronize_rcu()") Reported-by: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com> Suggested-by: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com> Tested-by: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250519125027.11900-2-socketcan@hartkopp.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # >= 5.4 Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2@huawei.com> --- net/can/bcm.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c index a1f5db0fd5d4..e74c0dd82142 100644 --- a/net/can/bcm.c +++ b/net/can/bcm.c @@ -205,7 +205,9 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_printf(m, " / bound %s", bcm_proc_getifname(net, ifname, bo->ifindex)); seq_printf(m, " <<<\n"); - list_for_each_entry(op, &bo->rx_ops, list) { + rcu_read_lock(); + + list_for_each_entry_rcu(op, &bo->rx_ops, list) { unsigned long reduction; @@ -261,6 +263,9 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_printf(m, "# sent %ld\n", op->frames_abs); } seq_putc(m, '\n'); + + rcu_read_unlock(); + return 0; } #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ @@ -801,7 +806,7 @@ static int bcm_delete_rx_op(struct list_head *ops, struct bcm_msg_head *mh, REGMASK(op->can_id), bcm_rx_handler, op); - list_del(&op->list); + list_del_rcu(&op->list); bcm_remove_op(op); return 1; /* done */ } @@ -821,7 +826,7 @@ static int bcm_delete_tx_op(struct list_head *ops, struct bcm_msg_head *mh, list_for_each_entry_safe(op, n, ops, list) { if ((op->can_id == mh->can_id) && (op->ifindex == ifindex) && (op->flags & CAN_FD_FRAME) == (mh->flags & CAN_FD_FRAME)) { - list_del(&op->list); + list_del_rcu(&op->list); bcm_remove_op(op); return 1; /* done */ } @@ -1234,7 +1239,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg, bcm_rx_handler, op, "bcm", sk); if (err) { /* this bcm rx op is broken -> remove it */ - list_del(&op->list); + list_del_rcu(&op->list); bcm_remove_op(op); return err; } -- 2.25.1