data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e23ea/e23ea5dfec998633fd23d9dbf642fa7e91fd5fdf" alt=""
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.11-rc1 commit 86a6a68febfcf57b5c2a7ba33e6d6f1f78ca5197 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IB81V6 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- This generates noticeably better code with compilers that support it, since we don't need to test the error register etc, the exception just jumps to the error handling directly. Note that this also marks SW_TTBR0_PAN incompatible with KCSAN support, since KCSAN wants to save and restore the user access state. KCSAN and SW_TTBR0_PAN were probably always incompatible, but it became obvious only when implementing the unsafe user access functions. At that point the default empty user_access_save/restore() functions weren't provided by the default fallback functions. Note that according to the description above, it is necessary to disable KCSAN when enabling ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN after applying this patch. However, during compilation, there is a configuration circular dependency issue, so the dependency is temporarily removed. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: arch/arm64/Kconfig [Resolve conflicts dut to Recursive dependency on kconfig detected] Signed-off-by: Ze Zuo <zuoze1@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 + arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c | 12 ++- 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index c11aa218c08e..10200f20e47c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -1758,6 +1758,10 @@ config RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED config ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN bool "Emulate Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching" + # KCSAN and SW_TTBR0_PAN were probably always incompatible, but + # it became obvious only when implementing the unsafe user access + # functions. So don't use it together with KCSAN. + # depends on !KCSAN help Enabling this option prevents the kernel from accessing user-space memory directly by pointing TTBR0_EL1 to a reserved diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h index 07c1aeaeb094..407ce2f6ef24 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -184,29 +184,40 @@ static inline void __user *__uaccess_mask_ptr(const void __user *ptr) * The "__xxx_error" versions set the third argument to -EFAULT if an error * occurs, and leave it unchanged on success. */ -#define __get_mem_asm(load, reg, x, addr, err, type) \ +#ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT +#define __get_mem_asm(load, reg, x, addr, label, type) \ + asm_goto_output( \ + "1: " load " " reg "0, [%1]\n" \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_##type##ACCESS_ERR(1b, %l2, %w0) \ + : "=r" (x) \ + : "r" (addr) : : label) +#else +#define __get_mem_asm(load, reg, x, addr, label, type) do { \ + int __gma_err = 0; \ asm volatile( \ "1: " load " " reg "1, [%2]\n" \ "2:\n" \ _ASM_EXTABLE_##type##ACCESS_ERR_ZERO(1b, 2b, %w0, %w1) \ - : "+r" (err), "=r" (x) \ - : "r" (addr)) + : "+r" (__gma_err), "=r" (x) \ + : "r" (addr)); \ + if (__gma_err) goto label; } while (0) +#endif -#define __raw_get_mem(ldr, x, ptr, err, type) \ +#define __raw_get_mem(ldr, x, ptr, label, type) \ do { \ unsigned long __gu_val; \ switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \ case 1: \ - __get_mem_asm(ldr "b", "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), (err), type); \ + __get_mem_asm(ldr "b", "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), label, type); \ break; \ case 2: \ - __get_mem_asm(ldr "h", "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), (err), type); \ + __get_mem_asm(ldr "h", "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), label, type); \ break; \ case 4: \ - __get_mem_asm(ldr, "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), (err), type); \ + __get_mem_asm(ldr, "%w", __gu_val, (ptr), label, type); \ break; \ case 8: \ - __get_mem_asm(ldr, "%x", __gu_val, (ptr), (err), type); \ + __get_mem_asm(ldr, "%x", __gu_val, (ptr), label, type); \ break; \ default: \ BUILD_BUG(); \ @@ -219,27 +230,34 @@ do { \ * uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). As `x` and `ptr` could contain blocking functions, * we must evaluate these outside of the critical section. */ -#define __raw_get_user(x, ptr, err) \ +#define __raw_get_user(x, ptr, label) \ do { \ __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__rgu_ptr = (ptr); \ __typeof__(x) __rgu_val; \ __chk_user_ptr(ptr); \ - \ - uaccess_ttbr0_enable(); \ - __raw_get_mem("ldtr", __rgu_val, __rgu_ptr, err, U); \ - uaccess_ttbr0_disable(); \ - \ - (x) = __rgu_val; \ + do { \ + __label__ __rgu_failed; \ + uaccess_ttbr0_enable(); \ + __raw_get_mem("ldtr", __rgu_val, __rgu_ptr, __rgu_failed, U); \ + uaccess_ttbr0_disable(); \ + (x) = __rgu_val; \ + break; \ + __rgu_failed: \ + uaccess_ttbr0_disable(); \ + goto label; \ + } while (0); \ } while (0) #define __get_user_error(x, ptr, err) \ do { \ + __label__ __gu_failed; \ __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr); \ might_fault(); \ if (access_ok(__p, sizeof(*__p))) { \ __p = uaccess_mask_ptr(__p); \ - __raw_get_user((x), __p, (err)); \ + __raw_get_user((x), __p, __gu_failed); \ } else { \ + __gu_failed: \ (x) = (__force __typeof__(x))0; (err) = -EFAULT; \ } \ } while (0) @@ -262,15 +280,18 @@ do { \ do { \ __typeof__(dst) __gkn_dst = (dst); \ __typeof__(src) __gkn_src = (src); \ - int __gkn_err = 0; \ - \ - __mte_enable_tco_async(); \ - __raw_get_mem("ldr", *((type *)(__gkn_dst)), \ - (__force type *)(__gkn_src), __gkn_err, K); \ - __mte_disable_tco_async(); \ + do { \ + __label__ __gkn_label; \ \ - if (unlikely(__gkn_err)) \ + __mte_enable_tco_async(); \ + __raw_get_mem("ldr", *((type *)(__gkn_dst)), \ + (__force type *)(__gkn_src), __gkn_label, K); \ + __mte_disable_tco_async(); \ + break; \ + __gkn_label: \ + __mte_disable_tco_async(); \ goto err_label; \ + } while (0); \ } while (0) #define __put_mem_asm(store, reg, x, addr, err, type) \ @@ -381,6 +402,60 @@ extern unsigned long __must_check __arch_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const voi __actu_ret; \ }) +static __must_check __always_inline bool user_access_begin(const void __user *ptr, size_t len) +{ + if (unlikely(!access_ok(ptr,len))) + return 0; + uaccess_ttbr0_enable(); + return 1; +} +#define user_access_begin(a,b) user_access_begin(a,b) +#define user_access_end() uaccess_ttbr0_disable() + +/* + * The arm64 inline asms should learn abut asm goto, and we should + * teach user_access_begin() about address masking. + */ +#define unsafe_put_user(x, ptr, label) do { \ + int __upu_err = 0; \ + __raw_put_mem("sttr", x, uaccess_mask_ptr(ptr), __upu_err, U); \ + if (__upu_err) goto label; \ +} while (0) + +#define unsafe_get_user(x, ptr, label) \ + __raw_get_mem("ldtr", x, uaccess_mask_ptr(ptr), label, U) + +/* + * KCSAN uses these to save and restore ttbr state. + * We do not support KCSAN with ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN, so + * they are no-ops. + */ +static inline unsigned long user_access_save(void) { return 0; } +static inline void user_access_restore(unsigned long enabled) { } + +/* + * We want the unsafe accessors to always be inlined and use + * the error labels - thus the macro games. + */ +#define unsafe_copy_loop(dst, src, len, type, label) \ + while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \ + unsafe_put_user(*(type *)(src),(type __user *)(dst),label); \ + dst += sizeof(type); \ + src += sizeof(type); \ + len -= sizeof(type); \ + } + +#define unsafe_copy_to_user(_dst,_src,_len,label) \ +do { \ + char __user *__ucu_dst = (_dst); \ + const char *__ucu_src = (_src); \ + size_t __ucu_len = (_len); \ + unsafe_copy_loop(__ucu_dst, __ucu_src, __ucu_len, u64, label); \ + unsafe_copy_loop(__ucu_dst, __ucu_src, __ucu_len, u32, label); \ + unsafe_copy_loop(__ucu_dst, __ucu_src, __ucu_len, u16, label); \ + unsafe_copy_loop(__ucu_dst, __ucu_src, __ucu_len, u8, label); \ +} while (0) + #define INLINE_COPY_TO_USER #define INLINE_COPY_FROM_USER diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c index cea96ee75d22..c4999d2d7ce8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c @@ -582,12 +582,9 @@ subsys_initcall(register_mte_tcf_preferred_sysctl); size_t mte_probe_user_range(const char __user *uaddr, size_t size) { const char __user *end = uaddr + size; - int err = 0; char val; - __raw_get_user(val, uaddr, err); - if (err) - return size; + __raw_get_user(val, uaddr, efault); uaddr = PTR_ALIGN(uaddr, MTE_GRANULE_SIZE); while (uaddr < end) { @@ -595,12 +592,13 @@ size_t mte_probe_user_range(const char __user *uaddr, size_t size) * A read is sufficient for mte, the caller should have probed * for the pte write permission if required. */ - __raw_get_user(val, uaddr, err); - if (err) - return end - uaddr; + __raw_get_user(val, uaddr, efault); uaddr += MTE_GRANULE_SIZE; } (void)val; return 0; + +efault: + return end - uaddr; } -- 2.25.1