From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.49 commit dc14d542e683eacf904a7eb91f39d9eaace66a40 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAQOJM CVE: CVE-2024-45009 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit 57f86203b41c98b322119dfdbb1ec54ce5e3369b upstream. The ADD_ADDR 0 with the address from the initial subflow should not be considered as a new address: this is not something new. If the host receives it, it simply means that the address is available again. When receiving an ADD_ADDR for the ID 0, the PM already doesn't consider it as new by not incrementing the 'add_addr_accepted' counter. But the 'accept_addr' might not be set if the limit has already been reached: this can be bypassed in this case. But before, it is important to check that this ADD_ADDR for the ID 0 is for the same address as the initial subflow. If not, it is not something that should happen, and the ADD_ADDR can be ignored. Note that if an ADD_ADDR is received while there is already a subflow opened using the same address, this ADD_ADDR is ignored as well. It means that if multiple ADD_ADDR for ID 0 are received, there will not be any duplicated subflows created by the client. Fixes: d0876b2284cf ("mptcp: add the incoming RM_ADDR support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com> --- net/mptcp/pm.c | 4 +++- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 9 +++++++++ net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c index 53e0b08b1123..8847fd02f3d9 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c @@ -237,7 +237,9 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const struct sock *ssk, } else { __MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDRDROP); } - } else if (!READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr)) { + /* id0 should not have a different address */ + } else if ((addr->id == 0 && !mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(msk, addr)) || + (addr->id > 0 && !READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr))) { mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, addr, true); mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk); } else if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) { diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index 7535b1fb0c0b..e0f6f72bf7d5 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -743,6 +743,15 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) } } +bool mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, + const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote) +{ + struct mptcp_addr_info mpc_remote; + + remote_address((struct sock_common *)msk, &mpc_remote); + return mptcp_addresses_equal(&mpc_remote, remote, remote->port); +} + void mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk) { struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h index 524516025b6e..aaeff21553d1 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h @@ -907,6 +907,8 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const struct sock *ssk, void mptcp_pm_add_addr_echoed(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr); void mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk); +bool mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, + const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote); void mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk); void mptcp_pm_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list); -- 2.34.1