From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.11-rc1 commit 6ba7acdb93b4ecb554d5838fca3f5f0fcf9fff14 category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IDC9YK Reference: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commi... -------------------------------- Add test cases for the bits iter: - Positive cases - Bit mask representing a single word (8-byte unit) - Bit mask representing data spanning more than one word - The index of the set bit - Nagative cases - bpf_iter_bits_destroy() is required after calling bpf_iter_bits_new() - bpf_iter_bits_destroy() can only destroy an initialized iter - bpf_iter_bits_next() must use an initialized iter - Bit mask representing zero words - Bit mask representing fewer words than expected - Case for ENOMEM - Case for NULL pointer Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240517023034.48138-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zicheng Qu <quzicheng@huawei.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 + .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 155 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c index 8d746642cbd7..6de0aeebbb4a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ #include "verifier_xadd.skel.h" #include "verifier_xdp.skel.h" #include "verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access.skel.h" +#include "verifier_bits_iter.skel.h" #define MAX_ENTRIES 11 @@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ void test_verifier_var_off(void) { RUN(verifier_var_off); } void test_verifier_xadd(void) { RUN(verifier_xadd); } void test_verifier_xdp(void) { RUN(verifier_xdp); } void test_verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access(void) { RUN(verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access); } +void test_verifier_bits_iter(void) { RUN(verifier_bits_iter); } static int init_test_val_map(struct bpf_object *obj, char *map_name) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..716113c2bce2 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> */ + +#include "vmlinux.h" +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> + +#include "bpf_misc.h" +#include "task_kfunc_common.h" + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +int bpf_iter_bits_new(struct bpf_iter_bits *it, const u64 *unsafe_ptr__ign, + u32 nr_bits) __ksym __weak; +int *bpf_iter_bits_next(struct bpf_iter_bits *it) __ksym __weak; +void bpf_iter_bits_destroy(struct bpf_iter_bits *it) __ksym __weak; + +SEC("iter.s/cgroup") +__description("bits iter without destroy") +__failure __msg("Unreleased reference") +int BPF_PROG(no_destroy, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct cgroup *cgrp) +{ + struct bpf_iter_bits it; + u64 data = 1; + + bpf_iter_bits_new(&it, &data, 1); + bpf_iter_bits_next(&it); + return 0; +} + +SEC("iter/cgroup") +__description("uninitialized iter in ->next()") +__failure __msg("expected an initialized iter_bits as arg #1") +int BPF_PROG(next_uninit, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct cgroup *cgrp) +{ + struct bpf_iter_bits *it = NULL; + + bpf_iter_bits_next(it); + return 0; +} + +SEC("iter/cgroup") +__description("uninitialized iter in ->destroy()") +__failure __msg("expected an initialized iter_bits as arg #1") +int BPF_PROG(destroy_uninit, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta, struct cgroup *cgrp) +{ + struct bpf_iter_bits it = {}; + + bpf_iter_bits_destroy(&it); + return 0; +} + +SEC("syscall") +__description("null pointer") +__success __retval(0) +int null_pointer(void) +{ + int nr = 0; + int *bit; + + bpf_for_each(bits, bit, NULL, 1) + nr++; + return nr; +} + +SEC("syscall") +__description("bits copy") +__success __retval(10) +int bits_copy(void) +{ + u64 data = 0xf7310UL; /* 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 0*/ + int nr = 0; + int *bit; + + bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data, 1) + nr++; + return nr; +} + +SEC("syscall") +__description("bits memalloc") +__success __retval(64) +int bits_memalloc(void) +{ + u64 data[2]; + int nr = 0; + int *bit; + + __builtin_memset(&data, 0xf0, sizeof(data)); /* 4 * 16 */ + bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], sizeof(data) / sizeof(u64)) + nr++; + return nr; +} + +SEC("syscall") +__description("bit index") +__success __retval(8) +int bit_index(void) +{ + u64 data = 0x100; + int bit_idx = 0; + int *bit; + + bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data, 1) { + if (*bit == 0) + continue; + bit_idx = *bit; + } + return bit_idx; +} + +SEC("syscall") +__description("bits nomem") +__success __retval(0) +int bits_nomem(void) +{ + u64 data[4]; + int nr = 0; + int *bit; + + __builtin_memset(&data, 0xff, sizeof(data)); + bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], 513) /* Be greater than 512 */ + nr++; + return nr; +} + +SEC("syscall") +__description("fewer words") +__success __retval(1) +int fewer_words(void) +{ + u64 data[2] = {0x1, 0xff}; + int nr = 0; + int *bit; + + bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], 1) + nr++; + return nr; +} + +SEC("syscall") +__description("zero words") +__success __retval(0) +int zero_words(void) +{ + u64 data[2] = {0x1, 0xff}; + int nr = 0; + int *bit; + + bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], 0) + nr++; + return nr; +} -- 2.34.1