data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08bd7/08bd75d7a660a8fe64a16d5f42ee2948549a203d" alt=""
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-5.13-rc1 commit efdb22de7dcd3b24b8154b3c3ba496f62afea00c category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5EUVD CVE: NA Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... ------------------------------------------------- During verifier check_cfg(), all instructions are visited to ensure verifier can handle program control flows. This patch factored out function visit_func_call_insn() so it can be reused in later patch to visit callback function calls. There is no functionality change for this patch. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210226204920.3884136-1-yhs@fb.com (cherry picked from commit efdb22de7dcd3b24b8154b3c3ba496f62afea00c) Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index d78c809926f7..5e426656ddac 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -8681,6 +8681,27 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return DONE_EXPLORING; } +static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, int insn_cnt, + struct bpf_insn *insns, + struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + bool visit_callee) +{ + int ret; + + ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env, false); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (t + 1 < insn_cnt) + init_explored_state(env, t + 1); + if (visit_callee) { + init_explored_state(env, t); + ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].imm + 1, BRANCH, + env, false); + } + return ret; +} + /* Visits the instruction at index t and returns one of the following: * < 0 - an error occurred * DONE_EXPLORING - the instruction was fully explored @@ -8701,18 +8722,8 @@ static int visit_insn(int t, int insn_cnt, struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return DONE_EXPLORING; case BPF_CALL: - ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env, false); - if (ret) - return ret; - - if (t + 1 < insn_cnt) - init_explored_state(env, t + 1); - if (insns[t].src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) { - init_explored_state(env, t); - ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].imm + 1, BRANCH, - env, false); - } - return ret; + return visit_func_call_insn(t, insn_cnt, insns, env, + insns[t].src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL); case BPF_JA: if (BPF_SRC(insns[t].code) != BPF_K) -- 2.20.1