From: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com> Offering: HULK hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5XQS4 CVE: NA ----------------------------------------- Fix the following CodeCheck2.0 static check warning: Do not declare or define reserved identifiers. The reserved identifier: __find_sp_area_locked Fix this by renaming __find_sp_area_locked to find_sp_area_locked. Signed-off-by: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com> --- mm/share_pool.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/share_pool.c b/mm/share_pool.c index ee2296d2d1cd..96b2b1d248ff 100644 --- a/mm/share_pool.c +++ b/mm/share_pool.c @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ static struct sp_area *sp_alloc_area(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, } /* the caller should hold sp_area_lock */ -static struct sp_area *__find_sp_area_locked(struct sp_group *spg, +static struct sp_area *find_sp_area_locked(struct sp_group *spg, unsigned long addr) { struct sp_mapping *spm = sp_mapping_find(spg, addr); @@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@ static struct sp_area *get_sp_area(struct sp_group *spg, unsigned long addr) struct sp_area *n; spin_lock(&sp_area_lock); - n = __find_sp_area_locked(spg, addr); + n = find_sp_area_locked(spg, addr); if (n) atomic_inc(&n->use_count); spin_unlock(&sp_area_lock); @@ -2038,7 +2038,7 @@ void sp_area_drop(struct vm_area_struct *vma) * Considering a situation where task A and B are in the same spg. * A is exiting and calling remove_vma() -> ... -> sp_area_drop(). * Concurrently, B is calling sp_free() to free the same spa. - * __find_sp_area_locked() and __sp_area_drop_locked() should be + * find_sp_area_locked() and __sp_area_drop_locked() should be * an atomic operation. */ spin_lock(&sp_area_lock); -- 2.17.1