
From: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.10-rc1 commit af398bd0cb2151a581027a19bd995f72af2310ac category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IC914B Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- smc_hash_sk and smc_unhash_sk are only used in af_smc.c, so make them static and remove the output symbol. They can be called under the path .prot->hash()/unhash(). Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com> --- include/net/smc.h | 3 --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 6 ++---- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/smc.h b/include/net/smc.h index c9dcb30e3fd9..10684d0a33df 100644 --- a/include/net/smc.h +++ b/include/net/smc.h @@ -26,9 +26,6 @@ struct smc_hashinfo { struct hlist_head ht; }; -int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk); -void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk); - /* SMCD/ISM device driver interface */ struct smcd_dmb { u64 dmb_tok; diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index bc168a7beecf..eb2b82cbf3c6 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static struct smc_hashinfo smc_v6_hashinfo = { .lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(smc_v6_hashinfo.lock), }; -int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk) +static int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk) { struct smc_hashinfo *h = sk->sk_prot->h.smc_hash; struct hlist_head *head; @@ -125,9 +125,8 @@ int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk) return 0; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smc_hash_sk); -void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk) +static void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk) { struct smc_hashinfo *h = sk->sk_prot->h.smc_hash; @@ -136,7 +135,6 @@ void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk) sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1); write_unlock_bh(&h->lock); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smc_unhash_sk); /* This will be called before user really release sock_lock. So do the * work which we didn't do because of user hold the sock_lock in the -- 2.34.1