From: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.10-rc1 commit e9a9292e2368e9be4a48aae6ff8aafa3433133e6 category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/ID7HLY Reference: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commi... -------------------------------- When the watchdog determines that the current soft lockup is due to an interrupt storm based on CPU utilization, reporting the most frequent interrupts could be good enough for further troubleshooting. Below is an example of interrupt storm. The call tree does not provide useful information, but analyzing which interrupt caused the soft lockup by comparing the counts of interrupts during the lockup period allows to identify the culprit. [ 638.870231] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 26s! [swapper/9:0] [ 638.870825] CPU#9 Utilization every 4s during lockup: [ 638.871194] #1: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 638.871652] #2: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 638.872107] #3: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 638.872563] #4: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 638.873018] #5: 0% system, 0% softirq, 100% hardirq, 0% idle [ 638.873494] CPU#9 Detect HardIRQ Time exceeds 50%. Most frequent HardIRQs: [ 638.873994] #1: 330945 irq#7 [ 638.874236] #2: 31 irq#82 [ 638.874493] #3: 10 irq#10 [ 638.874744] #4: 2 irq#89 [ 638.874992] #5: 1 irq#102 ... [ 638.875313] Call trace: [ 638.875315] __do_softirq+0xa8/0x364 Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240411074134.30922-6-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com Conflicts: kernel/watchdog.c [Only pick the part modified by this mainline commit, and ignore the conflict part caused by higher version.] Signed-off-by: Zicheng Qu <quzicheng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: cheliequan <cheliequan@inspur.com> Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com> --- kernel/watchdog.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c index 8ee313d6939e..8dcd5736e0e8 100644 --- a/kernel/watchdog.c +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -12,23 +12,26 @@ #define pr_fmt(fmt) "watchdog: " fmt -#include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> -#include <linux/nmi.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/kprobes.h> +#include <linux/irq.h> +#include <linux/irqdesc.h> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h> +#include <linux/kvm_para.h> #include <linux/math64.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/nmi.h> +#include <linux/stop_machine.h> #include <linux/sysctl.h> #include <linux/tick.h> + #include <linux/sched/clock.h> #include <linux/sched/debug.h> #include <linux/sched/isolation.h> -#include <linux/stop_machine.h> #include <asm/irq_regs.h> -#include <linux/kvm_para.h> static DEFINE_MUTEX(watchdog_mutex); @@ -402,13 +405,105 @@ static void print_cpustat(void) } } +#define HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH 50 +#define NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT 5 +struct irq_counts { + int irq; + u32 counts; +}; + +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, snapshot_taken); + +/* Tabulate the most frequent interrupts. */ +static void tabulate_irq_count(struct irq_counts *irq_counts, int irq, u32 counts, int rank) +{ + int i; + struct irq_counts new_count = {irq, counts}; + + for (i = 0; i < rank; i++) { + if (counts > irq_counts[i].counts) + swap(new_count, irq_counts[i]); + } +} + +/* + * If the hardirq time exceeds HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH% of the sample_period, + * then the cause of softlockup might be interrupt storm. In this case, it + * would be useful to start interrupt counting. + */ +static bool need_counting_irqs(void) +{ + u8 util; + int tail = __this_cpu_read(cpustat_tail); + + tail = (tail + NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT - 1) % NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT; + util = __this_cpu_read(cpustat_util[tail][STATS_HARDIRQ]); + return util > HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH; +} + +static void start_counting_irqs(void) +{ + if (!__this_cpu_read(snapshot_taken)) { + kstat_snapshot_irqs(); + __this_cpu_write(snapshot_taken, true); + } +} + +static void stop_counting_irqs(void) +{ + __this_cpu_write(snapshot_taken, false); +} + +static void print_irq_counts(void) +{ + unsigned int i, count; + struct irq_counts irq_counts_sorted[NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT] = { + {-1, 0}, {-1, 0}, {-1, 0}, {-1, 0}, {-1, 0} + }; + + if (__this_cpu_read(snapshot_taken)) { + for_each_active_irq(i) { + count = kstat_get_irq_since_snapshot(i); + tabulate_irq_count(irq_counts_sorted, i, count, NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT); + } + + /* + * Outputting the "watchdog" prefix on every line is redundant and not + * concise, and the original alarm information is sufficient for + * positioning in logs, hence here printk() is used instead of pr_crit(). + */ + printk(KERN_CRIT "CPU#%d Detect HardIRQ Time exceeds %d%%. Most frequent HardIRQs:\n", + smp_processor_id(), HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH); + + for (i = 0; i < NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT; i++) { + if (irq_counts_sorted[i].irq == -1) + break; + + printk(KERN_CRIT "\t#%u: %-10u\tirq#%d\n", + i + 1, irq_counts_sorted[i].counts, + irq_counts_sorted[i].irq); + } + + /* + * If the hardirq time is less than HARDIRQ_PERCENT_THRESH% in the last + * sample_period, then we suspect the interrupt storm might be subsiding. + */ + if (!need_counting_irqs()) + stop_counting_irqs(); + } +} + static void report_cpu_status(void) { print_cpustat(); + print_irq_counts(); } #else static inline void update_cpustat(void) { } static inline void report_cpu_status(void) { } +static inline bool need_counting_irqs(void) { return false; } +static inline void start_counting_irqs(void) { } +static inline void stop_counting_irqs(void) { } #endif /* @@ -512,6 +607,18 @@ static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts, unsigned long now) { if ((watchdog_enabled & WATCHDOG_SOFTOCKUP_ENABLED) && watchdog_thresh) { + /* + * If period_ts has not been updated during a sample_period, then + * in the subsequent few sample_periods, period_ts might also not + * be updated, which could indicate a potential softlockup. In + * this case, if we suspect the cause of the potential softlockup + * might be interrupt storm, then we need to count the interrupts + * to find which interrupt is storming. + */ + if (time_after_eq(now, period_ts + get_softlockup_thresh() / NUM_SAMPLE_PERIODS) && + need_counting_irqs()) + start_counting_irqs(); + /* Warn about unreasonable delays. */ if (time_after(now, period_ts + get_softlockup_thresh())) return now - touch_ts; @@ -534,6 +641,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, softlockup_stop_work); static int softlockup_fn(void *data) { update_touch_ts(); + stop_counting_irqs(); complete(this_cpu_ptr(&softlockup_completion)); return 0; -- 2.34.1