From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.59 commit 509c29d0d26f68a6f6d0a05cb1a89725237e2b87 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IB2STY CVE: CVE-2024-50140 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 73ab05aa46b02d96509cb029a8d04fca7bbde8c7 ] With KASAN and PREEMPT_RT enabled, calling task_work_add() in task_tick_mm_cid() may cause the following splat. [ 63.696416] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 [ 63.696416] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 610, name: modprobe [ 63.696416] preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0 [ 63.696416] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1 This problem is caused by the following call trace. sched_tick() [ acquire rq->__lock ] -> task_tick_mm_cid() -> task_work_add() -> __kasan_record_aux_stack() -> kasan_save_stack() -> stack_depot_save_flags() -> alloc_pages_mpol_noprof() -> __alloc_pages_noprof() -> get_page_from_freelist() -> rmqueue() -> rmqueue_pcplist() -> __rmqueue_pcplist() -> rmqueue_bulk() -> rt_spin_lock() The rq lock is a raw_spinlock_t. We can't sleep while holding it. IOW, we can't call alloc_pages() in stack_depot_save_flags(). The task_tick_mm_cid() function with its task_work_add() call was introduced by commit 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid") in v6.4 kernel. Fortunately, there is a kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() variant that calls stack_depot_save_flags() while not allowing it to allocate new pages. To allow task_tick_mm_cid() to use task_work without page allocation, a new TWAF_NO_ALLOC flag is added to enable calling kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() instead of kasan_record_aux_stack() if set. The task_tick_mm_cid() function is modified to add this new flag. The possible downside is the missing stack trace in a KASAN report due to new page allocation required when task_work_add_noallloc() is called which should be rare. Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid") Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241010014432.194742-1-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Kai <liukai284@huawei.com> --- include/linux/task_work.h | 5 ++++- kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +++- kernel/task_work.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/task_work.h b/include/linux/task_work.h index cf5e7e891a776..2964171856e00 100644 --- a/include/linux/task_work.h +++ b/include/linux/task_work.h @@ -14,11 +14,14 @@ init_task_work(struct callback_head *twork, task_work_func_t func) } enum task_work_notify_mode { - TWA_NONE, + TWA_NONE = 0, TWA_RESUME, TWA_SIGNAL, TWA_SIGNAL_NO_IPI, TWA_NMI_CURRENT, + + TWA_FLAGS = 0xff00, + TWAF_NO_ALLOC = 0x0100, }; static inline bool task_work_pending(struct task_struct *task) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 17122e99b9330..48547182d9f57 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -12678,7 +12678,9 @@ void task_tick_mm_cid(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) return; if (time_before(now, READ_ONCE(curr->mm->mm_cid_next_scan))) return; - task_work_add(curr, work, TWA_RESUME); + + /* No page allocation under rq lock */ + task_work_add(curr, work, TWA_RESUME | TWAF_NO_ALLOC); } void sched_mm_cid_exit_signals(struct task_struct *t) diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c index 5c2daa7ad3f90..8aa43204cb7dd 100644 --- a/kernel/task_work.c +++ b/kernel/task_work.c @@ -53,13 +53,24 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, enum task_work_notify_mode notify) { struct callback_head *head; + int flags = notify & TWA_FLAGS; + notify &= ~TWA_FLAGS; if (notify == TWA_NMI_CURRENT) { if (WARN_ON_ONCE(task != current)) return -EINVAL; } else { - /* record the work call stack in order to print it in KASAN reports */ - kasan_record_aux_stack(work); + /* + * Record the work call stack in order to print it in KASAN + * reports. + * + * Note that stack allocation can fail if TWAF_NO_ALLOC flag + * is set and new page is needed to expand the stack buffer. + */ + if (flags & TWAF_NO_ALLOC) + kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc(work); + else + kasan_record_aux_stack(work); } head = READ_ONCE(task->task_works); -- 2.34.1