From: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.7-rc1 commit 4ac4546821584736798aaa9e97da9f6eaf689ea3 category: feature bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/8335 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This patch adds kfuncs bpf_iter_task_vma_{new,next,destroy} which allow creation and manipulation of struct bpf_iter_task_vma in open-coded iterator style. BPF programs can use these kfuncs directly or through bpf_for_each macro for natural-looking iteration of all task vmas. The implementation borrows heavily from bpf_find_vma helper's locking - differing only in that it holds the mmap_read lock for all iterations while the helper only executes its provided callback on a maximum of 1 vma. Aside from locking, struct vma_iterator and vma_next do all the heavy lifting. A pointer to an inner data struct, struct bpf_iter_task_vma_data, is the only field in struct bpf_iter_task_vma. This is because the inner data struct contains a struct vma_iterator (not ptr), whose size is likely to change under us. If bpf_iter_task_vma_kern contained vma_iterator directly such a change would require change in opaque bpf_iter_task_vma struct's size. So better to allocate vma_iterator using BPF allocator, and since that alloc must already succeed, might as well allocate all iter fields, thereby freezing struct bpf_iter_task_vma size. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231013204426.1074286-4-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com> --- kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 3 ++ kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index c889a9dee6c6..fed10499f218 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -2671,6 +2671,9 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr, KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_num_new, KF_ITER_NEW) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_num_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_num_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_vma_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_RCU) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_vma_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_adjust) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_null) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c index f7ef58090c7d..210128790e6f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/fdtable.h> #include <linux/filter.h> +#include <linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h> #include <linux/btf_ids.h> +#include <linux/mm_types.h> #include "mmap_unlock_work.h" static const char * const iter_task_type_names[] = { @@ -823,6 +825,95 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_find_vma_proto = { .arg5_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; +struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data { + struct task_struct *task; + struct mm_struct *mm; + struct mmap_unlock_irq_work *work; + struct vma_iterator vmi; +}; + +struct bpf_iter_task_vma { + /* opaque iterator state; having __u64 here allows to preserve correct + * alignment requirements in vmlinux.h, generated from BTF + */ + __u64 __opaque[1]; +} __attribute__((aligned(8))); + +/* Non-opaque version of bpf_iter_task_vma */ +struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern { + struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data *data; +} __attribute__((aligned(8))); + +__diag_push(); +__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes", + "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF"); + +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_vma_new(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it, + struct task_struct *task, u64 addr) +{ + struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern *kit = (void *)it; + bool irq_work_busy = false; + int err; + + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_vma)); + BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern) != __alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task_vma)); + + /* is_iter_reg_valid_uninit guarantees that kit hasn't been initialized + * before, so non-NULL kit->data doesn't point to previously + * bpf_mem_alloc'd bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data + */ + kit->data = bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_ma, sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data)); + if (!kit->data) + return -ENOMEM; + + kit->data->task = get_task_struct(task); + kit->data->mm = task->mm; + if (!kit->data->mm) { + err = -ENOENT; + goto err_cleanup_iter; + } + + /* kit->data->work == NULL is valid after bpf_mmap_unlock_get_irq_work */ + irq_work_busy = bpf_mmap_unlock_get_irq_work(&kit->data->work); + if (irq_work_busy || !mmap_read_trylock(kit->data->mm)) { + err = -EBUSY; + goto err_cleanup_iter; + } + + vma_iter_init(&kit->data->vmi, kit->data->mm, addr); + return 0; + +err_cleanup_iter: + if (kit->data->task) + put_task_struct(kit->data->task); + bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, kit->data); + /* NULL kit->data signals failed bpf_iter_task_vma initialization */ + kit->data = NULL; + return err; +} + +__bpf_kfunc struct vm_area_struct *bpf_iter_task_vma_next(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it) +{ + struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern *kit = (void *)it; + + if (!kit->data) /* bpf_iter_task_vma_new failed */ + return NULL; + return vma_next(&kit->data->vmi); +} + +__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it) +{ + struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern *kit = (void *)it; + + if (kit->data) { + bpf_mmap_unlock_mm(kit->data->work, kit->data->mm); + put_task_struct(kit->data->task); + bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, kit->data); + } +} + +__diag_pop(); + DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mmap_unlock_irq_work, mmap_unlock_work); static void do_mmap_read_unlock(struct irq_work *entry) -- 2.34.1