From: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.198 commit 6a722d24bec1f50df07c9f83ee11d06c7bd1b8a8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBP1P8 CVE: CVE-2022-49626 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 1ebe4feb8b442884f5a28d2437040096723dd1ea ] If SRIOV cannot be disabled during device removal or module unloading, return error code so it can be logged properly in the calling function. Note that this can only happen if any VF is currently attached to a guest using Xen, but not with vfio/KVM. Despite that in that case the VFs won't work properly with PF removed and/or the module unloaded, I have let it as is because I don't know what side effects may have changing it, and also it seems to be the same that other drivers are doing in this situation. In the case of being called during SRIOV reconfiguration, the behavior hasn't changed because the function is called with force=false. Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@huaiwei.com> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c index 3d76fd1504c2..f93b77dac393 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c @@ -406,12 +406,17 @@ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_enable(struct efx_nic *efx, int num_vfs) return rc; } +/* Disable SRIOV and remove VFs + * If some VFs are attached to a guest (using Xen, only) nothing is + * done if force=false, and vports are freed if force=true (for the non + * attachedc ones, only) but SRIOV is not disabled and VFs are not + * removed in either case. + */ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable(struct efx_nic *efx, bool force) { struct pci_dev *dev = efx->pci_dev; - unsigned int vfs_assigned = 0; - - vfs_assigned = pci_vfs_assigned(dev); + unsigned int vfs_assigned = pci_vfs_assigned(dev); + int rc = 0; if (vfs_assigned && !force) { netif_info(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "VFs are assigned to guests; " @@ -421,10 +426,12 @@ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable(struct efx_nic *efx, bool force) if (!vfs_assigned) pci_disable_sriov(dev); + else + rc = -EBUSY; efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching(efx); efx->vf_count = 0; - return 0; + return rc; } int efx_ef10_sriov_configure(struct efx_nic *efx, int num_vfs) -- 2.34.1