Hi Weilong, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 6f6f173b2b8fa65e1ef7ebc6e43b0b02c2a52759 commit: b498d9f1bacd40d583c0970cab02ad522127a7e7 [2051/2051] arm64/ascend: Add new enable_oom_killer interface for oom contrl config: arm64-randconfig-r111-20250323 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250323/202503230914.IDoSqyA4-lkp@i...) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.5.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250323/202503230914.IDoSqyA4-lkp@i...) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503230914.IDoSqyA4-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/memcontrol.c:3147:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'hisi_oom_recover' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 3147 | void hisi_oom_recover(struct obj_cgroup *objcg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
mm/memcontrol.c:3147:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'hisi_oom_recover' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/memcontrol.c:4228:21: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:4228:21: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:4228:21: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary * mm/memcontrol.c:4230:21: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:4230:21: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:4230:21: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary * mm/memcontrol.c:4386:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:4386:9: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:4386:9: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary * mm/memcontrol.c:4480:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:4480:9: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:4480:9: sparse: struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary * mm/memcontrol.c:6198:23: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:6198:23: sparse: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:6198:23: sparse: struct task_struct * mm/memcontrol.c:6415:52: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces): mm/memcontrol.c:6415:52: sparse: struct task_struct [noderef] __rcu * mm/memcontrol.c:6415:52: sparse: struct task_struct * mm/memcontrol.c:1320:18: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock' - wrong count at exit mm/memcontrol.c:1343:22: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock_irq' - wrong count at exit mm/memcontrol.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/spinlock.h, include/linux/wait.h, include/linux/pid.h, ...): include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave' - wrong count at exit mm/memcontrol.c:2111:6: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'folio_memcg_lock' - wrong count at exit mm/memcontrol.c:2158:17: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in '__folio_memcg_unlock' - unexpected unlock mm/memcontrol.c:6058:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'mem_cgroup_count_precharge_pte_range' - unexpected unlock mm/memcontrol.c:6326:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range' - unexpected unlock
vim +/hisi_oom_recover +3147 mm/memcontrol.c 3145 3146 #ifdef CONFIG_ASCEND_OOM
3147 void hisi_oom_recover(struct obj_cgroup *objcg) 3148 { 3149 struct mem_cgroup *memcg; 3150 3151 memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg); 3152 if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) 3153 memcg_oom_recover(memcg); 3154 css_put(&memcg->css); 3155 } 3156 #else 3157 static inline void hisi_oom_recover(struct obj_cgroup *objcg) { } 3158 #endif 3159
-- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki