[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] can: j1939: prevent deadlock by changing j1939_socks_lock to rwlock
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/facb4/facb4b1efed423032771a498edffa02a368c98f8" alt=""
From: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@yahoo.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.8-rc5 commit 6cdedc18ba7b9dacc36466e27e3267d201948c8d category: bugfix bugzilla: 189774, https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9E2GX CVE: CVE-2023-52638 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- The following 3 locks would race against each other, causing the deadlock situation in the Syzbot bug report: - j1939_socks_lock - active_session_list_lock - sk_session_queue_lock A reasonable fix is to change j1939_socks_lock to an rwlock, since in the rare situations where a write lock is required for the linked list that j1939_socks_lock is protecting, the code does not attempt to acquire any more locks. This would break the circular lock dependency, where, for example, the current thread already locks j1939_socks_lock and attempts to acquire sk_session_queue_lock, and at the same time, another thread attempts to acquire j1939_socks_lock while holding sk_session_queue_lock. NOTE: This patch along does not fix the unregister_netdevice bug reported by Syzbot; instead, it solves a deadlock situation to prepare for one or more further patches to actually fix the Syzbot bug, which appears to be a reference counting problem within the j1939 codebase. Reported-by: <syzbot+1591462f226d9cbf0564@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@yahoo.com> Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721162226.8639-1-astrajoan@yahoo.com [mkl: remove unrelated newline change] Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Conflicts: net/can/j1939/socket.c Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2@huawei.com> --- net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h | 2 +- net/can/j1939/main.c | 2 +- net/can/j1939/socket.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h index c8f469a7e7d9..4f4e0228ad7f 100644 --- a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h +++ b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct j1939_priv { unsigned int tp_max_packet_size; /* lock for j1939_socks list */ - spinlock_t j1939_socks_lock; + rwlock_t j1939_socks_lock; struct list_head j1939_socks; struct kref rx_kref; diff --git a/net/can/j1939/main.c b/net/can/j1939/main.c index 137054bff9ec..fed1de256827 100644 --- a/net/can/j1939/main.c +++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(struct net_device *ndev) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); j1939_tp_init(priv); - spin_lock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + rwlock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->j1939_socks); spin_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock); diff --git a/net/can/j1939/socket.c b/net/can/j1939/socket.c index ebff753076a9..89013808d908 100644 --- a/net/can/j1939/socket.c +++ b/net/can/j1939/socket.c @@ -79,16 +79,16 @@ static void j1939_jsk_add(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sock *jsk) jsk->state |= J1939_SOCK_BOUND; j1939_priv_get(priv); - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_add_tail(&jsk->list, &priv->j1939_socks); - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); } static void j1939_jsk_del(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sock *jsk) { - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_del_init(&jsk->list); - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); j1939_priv_put(priv); jsk->state &= ~J1939_SOCK_BOUND; @@ -336,13 +336,13 @@ bool j1939_sk_recv_match(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb) struct j1939_sock *jsk; bool match = false; - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) { match = j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, skcb); if (match) break; } - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); return match; } @@ -351,11 +351,11 @@ void j1939_sk_recv(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct j1939_sock *jsk; - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) { j1939_sk_recv_one(jsk, skb); } - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); } static void j1939_sk_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk) @@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struct j1939_priv *priv) struct j1939_sock *jsk; int error_code = ENETDOWN; - spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) { jsk->sk.sk_err = error_code; if (!sock_flag(&jsk->sk, SOCK_DEAD)) @@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struct j1939_priv *priv) j1939_sk_queue_drop_all(priv, jsk, error_code); } - spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); + read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); } static int j1939_sk_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, -- 2.25.1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15adf/15adf5406d4ff4990d325eaf02df1e142cfb4de1" alt=""
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/6447 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/2... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/6447 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/2...
participants (2)
-
Dong Chenchen
-
patchwork bot