[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/3] sync vgic-its from 5.10 to 6.6
sync vgic-its from 5.10 to 6.6 Heyi Guo (1): KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Flush pending LPIs when nuking DT Xiangyou Xie (2): KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Introduce multiple LPI translation caches KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Do not execute invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on movi command arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 8 +- arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 255 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 13 +- 3 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) base-commit: ea6de9f6732d495c506f9c140b4ec17c957e1b77 -- 2.43.GIT
From: Xiangyou Xie <xiexiangyou@huawei.com> virt inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I8UJ9Q CVE: NA from OLK-5.10 commit def3bcbda719 Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20190724090437.49952-4-xiexiangyou@huawei.com... ------------------------------------------------- Because dist->lpi_list_lock is a perVM lock, when a virtual machine is configured with multiple virtual NIC devices and receives network packets at the same time, dist->lpi_list_lock will become a performance bottleneck. This patch increases the number of lpi_translation_cache to eight, hashes the cpuid that executes irqfd_wakeup, and chooses which lpi_translation_cache to use. I tested the impact of virtual interrupt injection time-consuming： Run the iperf command to send UDP packets to the VM: iperf -c $IP -u -b 40m -l 64 -t 6000& The vm just receive UDP traffic. When configure multiple NICs, each NIC receives the above iperf UDP traffic, This may reflect the performance impact of shared resource competition, such as lock. Observing the delay of virtual interrupt injection: the time spent by the "irqfd_wakeup", "irqfd_inject" function, and kworker context switch. The less the better. ITS translation cache greatly reduces the delay of interrupt injection compared to kworker thread, because it eliminate wakeup and uncertain scheduling delay: kworker ITS translation cache improved 1 NIC 6.692 us 1.766 us 73.6% 10 NICs 7.536 us 2.574 us 65.8% Increases the number of lpi_translation_cache reduce lock competition. Multi-interrupt concurrent injections perform better: ITS translation cache with patch improved 1 NIC 1.766 us 1.694 us 4.1% 10 NICs 2.574 us 1.848 us 28.2% Signed-off-by: Xiangyou Xie <xiexiangyou@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Chaochao Xing <xingchaochao@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiangyou Xie <xiexiangyou@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jia Qingtong <jiaqingtong@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 8 +- arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 211 +++++++++++++++++++------------- include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 13 +- 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c index c8c3cb812783..162b0bdb9a00 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c @@ -52,9 +52,15 @@ void kvm_vgic_early_init(struct kvm *kvm) { struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; + raw_spinlock_t *lpi_lock; + int i; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dist->lpi_list_head); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dist->lpi_translation_cache); + for (i = 0; i < LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM; i++) { + lpi_lock = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[i].lpi_cache_lock; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dist->lpi_translation_cache[i].lpi_cache); + raw_spin_lock_init(lpi_lock); + } raw_spin_lock_init(&dist->lpi_list_lock); } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c index 5fe2365a629f..24764ef12486 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -545,13 +545,21 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_its_idregs(struct kvm *kvm, return 0; } +/* Default is 16 cached LPIs per vcpu */ +#define LPI_DEFAULT_PCPU_CACHE_SIZE 16 + static struct vgic_irq *__vgic_its_check_cache(struct vgic_dist *dist, phys_addr_t db, - u32 devid, u32 eventid) + u32 devid, u32 eventid, + int cacheid) { struct vgic_translation_cache_entry *cte; + struct vgic_irq *irq = NULL; + struct list_head *cache_head; + int pos = 0; - list_for_each_entry(cte, &dist->lpi_translation_cache, entry) { + cache_head = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache; + list_for_each_entry(cte, cache_head, entry) { /* * If we hit a NULL entry, there is nothing after this * point. @@ -559,21 +567,25 @@ static struct vgic_irq *__vgic_its_check_cache(struct vgic_dist *dist, if (!cte->irq) break; - if (cte->db != db || cte->devid != devid || - cte->eventid != eventid) - continue; + pos++; - /* - * Move this entry to the head, as it is the most - * recently used. - */ - if (!list_is_first(&cte->entry, &dist->lpi_translation_cache)) - list_move(&cte->entry, &dist->lpi_translation_cache); + if (cte->devid == devid && + cte->eventid == eventid && + cte->db == db) { + /* + * Move this entry to the head if the entry at the + * position behind the LPI_DEFAULT_PCPU_CACHE_SIZE * 2 + * of the LRU list, as it is the most recently used. + */ + if (pos > LPI_DEFAULT_PCPU_CACHE_SIZE * 2) + list_move(&cte->entry, cache_head); - return cte->irq; + irq = cte->irq; + break; + } } - return NULL; + return irq; } static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db, @@ -581,11 +593,15 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db, { struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; struct vgic_irq *irq; - unsigned long flags; + int cpu; + int cacheid; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); - irq = __vgic_its_check_cache(dist, db, devid, eventid); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + cpu = smp_processor_id(); + cacheid = cpu % LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM; + + raw_spin_lock(&dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache_lock); + irq = __vgic_its_check_cache(dist, db, devid, eventid, cacheid); + raw_spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache_lock); return irq; } @@ -598,49 +614,58 @@ static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its, struct vgic_translation_cache_entry *cte; unsigned long flags; phys_addr_t db; + raw_spinlock_t *lpi_lock; + struct list_head *cache_head; + int cacheid; /* Do not cache a directly injected interrupt */ if (irq->hw) return; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); - - if (unlikely(list_empty(&dist->lpi_translation_cache))) - goto out; - - /* - * We could have raced with another CPU caching the same - * translation behind our back, so let's check it is not in - * already - */ - db = its->vgic_its_base + GITS_TRANSLATER; - if (__vgic_its_check_cache(dist, db, devid, eventid)) - goto out; - - /* Always reuse the last entry (LRU policy) */ - cte = list_last_entry(&dist->lpi_translation_cache, - typeof(*cte), entry); + for (cacheid = 0; cacheid < LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM; cacheid++) { + lpi_lock = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache_lock; + cache_head = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache; + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lpi_lock, flags); + if (unlikely(list_empty(cache_head))) { + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lpi_lock, flags); + break; + } - /* - * Caching the translation implies having an extra reference - * to the interrupt, so drop the potential reference on what - * was in the cache, and increment it on the new interrupt. - */ - if (cte->irq) - __vgic_put_lpi_locked(kvm, cte->irq); + /* + * We could have raced with another CPU caching the same + * translation behind our back, so let's check it is not in + * already + */ + db = its->vgic_its_base + GITS_TRANSLATER; + if (__vgic_its_check_cache(dist, db, devid, eventid, cacheid)) { + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lpi_lock, flags); + continue; + } - vgic_get_irq_kref(irq); + /* Always reuse the last entry (LRU policy) */ + cte = list_last_entry(cache_head, typeof(*cte), entry); - cte->db = db; - cte->devid = devid; - cte->eventid = eventid; - cte->irq = irq; + /* + * Caching the translation implies having an extra reference + * to the interrupt, so drop the potential reference on what + * was in the cache, and increment it on the new interrupt. + */ + if (cte->irq) { + raw_spin_lock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + __vgic_put_lpi_locked(kvm, cte->irq); + raw_spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + } + vgic_get_irq_kref(irq); - /* Move the new translation to the head of the list */ - list_move(&cte->entry, &dist->lpi_translation_cache); + cte->db = db; + cte->devid = devid; + cte->eventid = eventid; + cte->irq = irq; -out: - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + /* Move the new translation to the head of the list */ + list_move(&cte->entry, cache_head); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lpi_lock, flags); + } } void vgic_its_invalidate_cache(struct kvm *kvm) @@ -648,22 +673,29 @@ void vgic_its_invalidate_cache(struct kvm *kvm) struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; struct vgic_translation_cache_entry *cte; unsigned long flags; + raw_spinlock_t *lpi_lock; + struct list_head *cache_head; + int i; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); - - list_for_each_entry(cte, &dist->lpi_translation_cache, entry) { - /* - * If we hit a NULL entry, there is nothing after this - * point. - */ - if (!cte->irq) - break; - - __vgic_put_lpi_locked(kvm, cte->irq); - cte->irq = NULL; + for (i = 0; i < LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM; i++) { + lpi_lock = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[i].lpi_cache_lock; + cache_head = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[i].lpi_cache; + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lpi_lock, flags); + list_for_each_entry(cte, cache_head, entry) { + /* + * If we hit a NULL entry, there is nothing after this + * point. + */ + if (!cte->irq) + break; + + raw_spin_lock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + __vgic_put_lpi_locked(kvm, cte->irq); + raw_spin_unlock(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + cte->irq = NULL; + } + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lpi_lock, flags); } - - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); } int vgic_its_resolve_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its, @@ -1882,30 +1914,34 @@ static int vgic_register_its_iodev(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its, return ret; } -/* Default is 16 cached LPIs per vcpu */ -#define LPI_DEFAULT_PCPU_CACHE_SIZE 16 - void vgic_lpi_translation_cache_init(struct kvm *kvm) { struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; unsigned int sz; + struct list_head *cache_head; int i; + int cacheid; - if (!list_empty(&dist->lpi_translation_cache)) - return; + for (cacheid = 0; cacheid < LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM; cacheid++) { + cache_head = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache; + if (!list_empty(cache_head)) + return; + } sz = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) * LPI_DEFAULT_PCPU_CACHE_SIZE; - for (i = 0; i < sz; i++) { - struct vgic_translation_cache_entry *cte; - - /* An allocation failure is not fatal */ - cte = kzalloc(sizeof(*cte), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); - if (WARN_ON(!cte)) - break; - - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cte->entry); - list_add(&cte->entry, &dist->lpi_translation_cache); + for (cacheid = 0; cacheid < LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM; cacheid++) { + cache_head = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache; + for (i = 0; i < sz; i++) { + struct vgic_translation_cache_entry *cte; + + /* An allocation failure is not fatal */ + cte = kzalloc(sizeof(*cte), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); + if (WARN_ON(!cte)) + break; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cte->entry); + list_add(&cte->entry, cache_head); + } } } @@ -1913,13 +1949,22 @@ void vgic_lpi_translation_cache_destroy(struct kvm *kvm) { struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; struct vgic_translation_cache_entry *cte, *tmp; + unsigned long flags; + raw_spinlock_t *lpi_lock; + struct list_head *cache_head; + int cacheid; vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm); - list_for_each_entry_safe(cte, tmp, - &dist->lpi_translation_cache, entry) { - list_del(&cte->entry); - kfree(cte); + for (cacheid = 0; cacheid < LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM; cacheid++) { + lpi_lock = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache_lock; + cache_head = &dist->lpi_translation_cache[cacheid].lpi_cache; + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lpi_lock, flags); + list_for_each_entry_safe(cte, tmp, cache_head, entry) { + list_del(&cte->entry); + kfree(cte); + } + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lpi_lock, flags); } } diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h index 5b27f94d4fad..382479a8b666 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ #define irq_is_spi(irq) ((irq) >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS && \ (irq) <= VGIC_MAX_SPI) +/*The number of lpi translation cache lists*/ +#define LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM 8 + enum vgic_type { VGIC_V2, /* Good ol' GICv2 */ VGIC_V3, /* New fancy GICv3 */ @@ -184,6 +187,12 @@ struct vgic_io_device { struct kvm_io_device dev; }; +struct its_trans_cache { + /* LPI translation cache */ + struct list_head lpi_cache; + raw_spinlock_t lpi_cache_lock; +}; + struct vgic_its { /* The base address of the ITS control register frame */ gpa_t vgic_its_base; @@ -278,8 +287,8 @@ struct vgic_dist { struct list_head lpi_list_head; int lpi_list_count; - /* LPI translation cache */ - struct list_head lpi_translation_cache; + /* LPI translation cache array */ + struct its_trans_cache lpi_translation_cache[LPI_TRANS_CACHES_NUM]; /* used by vgic-debug */ struct vgic_state_iter *iter; -- 2.43.GIT
From: Xiangyou Xie <xiexiangyou@huawei.com> euleros inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I8UJ9Q CVE: NA Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20190724090437.49952-3-xiexiangyou@huawei.com... from OLK-5.10 commit c89f1e49300a ------------------------------------------------- It is not necessary to invalidate the lpi translation cache when the virtual machine executes the movi instruction to adjust the affinity of the interrupt. Irqbalance will adjust the interrupt affinity in a short period of time to achieve the purpose of interrupting load balancing, but this does not affect the contents of the lpi translation cache. Reviewed-by: Hailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Xiangyou Xie <xiexiangyou@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Chaochao Xing <xingchaochao@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiangyou Xie <xiexiangyou@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jia Qingtong <jiaqingtong@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c index 24764ef12486..ff91e208c752 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -921,7 +921,8 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_movi(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its, ite->collection = collection; vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr); - vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm); + if (!vgic_lpis_enabled(vcpu)) + vgic_its_invalidate_cache(kvm); return update_affinity(ite->irq, vcpu); } -- 2.43.GIT
From: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com> virt inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I8UJ9Q CVE: NA Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20190724090437.49952-2-xiexiangyou@huawei.com... from OLK-5.10 commit aa4f446a8a97 ------------------------------------------------- Pending LPIs may block new allocated LPIs in kdump secondary kernel. We only do that for guest kernel access to limit the change impact. Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/commit/5b574685b743 Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jia Qingtong <jiaqingtong@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c index ff91e208c752..3a0dd5825364 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -1726,10 +1726,10 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm, } #define GITS_BASER_RO_MASK (GENMASK_ULL(52, 48) | GENMASK_ULL(58, 56)) -static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm, - struct vgic_its *its, - gpa_t addr, unsigned int len, - unsigned long val) +static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser_common(struct kvm *kvm, + struct vgic_its *its, + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len, + unsigned long val, bool uaccess) { const struct vgic_its_abi *abi = vgic_its_get_abi(its); u64 entry_size, table_type; @@ -1766,10 +1766,21 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm, *regptr = reg; if (!(reg & GITS_BASER_VALID)) { + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + unsigned long c; + /* Take the its_lock to prevent a race with a save/restore */ mutex_lock(&its->its_lock); switch (table_type) { case GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE: + if (!uaccess) { + /* Fix kdump irq missing issue */ + pr_debug("%s: flush pending LPIs for all VCPUs.\n", + __func__); + kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) + vgic_flush_pending_lpis(vcpu); + } + vgic_its_free_device_list(kvm, its); break; case GITS_BASER_TYPE_COLLECTION: @@ -1780,6 +1791,23 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm, } } +static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm, + struct vgic_its *its, + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len, + unsigned long val) +{ + vgic_mmio_write_its_baser_common(kvm, its, addr, len, val, false); +} + +static int vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm, + struct vgic_its *its, + gpa_t addr, unsigned int len, + unsigned long val) +{ + vgic_mmio_write_its_baser_common(kvm, its, addr, len, val, true); + return 0; +} + static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_its_ctlr(struct kvm *vcpu, struct vgic_its *its, gpa_t addr, unsigned int len) @@ -1872,8 +1900,9 @@ static struct vgic_register_region its_registers[] = { vgic_mmio_read_its_creadr, its_mmio_write_wi, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_its_creadr, 8, VGIC_ACCESS_64bit | VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), - REGISTER_ITS_DESC(GITS_BASER, - vgic_mmio_read_its_baser, vgic_mmio_write_its_baser, 0x40, + REGISTER_ITS_DESC_UACCESS(GITS_BASER, + vgic_mmio_read_its_baser, vgic_mmio_write_its_baser, + vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_its_baser, 0x40, VGIC_ACCESS_64bit | VGIC_ACCESS_32bit), REGISTER_ITS_DESC(GITS_IDREGS_BASE, vgic_mmio_read_its_idregs, its_mmio_write_wi, 0x30, -- 2.43.GIT
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/3953 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/6... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/3953 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/6...
participants (2)
-
Jia Qingtong -
patchwork bot