[PATCH OLK-5.10 1/2] config: enable CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN to be compatible with AMU platform
hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I73EPL -------------------------------- The KunPeng newest released platform supports the feature of AMU, and this configuration is backward compatible. This patch would acts as a prepatch for the following patch series. Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig index 76de734953fc..7b047c0265ee 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ CONFIG_AS_HAS_CFI_NEGATE_RA_STATE=y # # ARMv8.4 architectural features # -# CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN is not set +CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN=y CONFIG_AS_HAS_ARMV8_4=y CONFIG_ARM64_TLB_RANGE=y # end of ARMv8.4 architectural features -- 2.25.1
hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I73EPL -------------------------------- As ARM AMU's document says, all counters are subject to any changes in clock frequency, including clock stopping caused by the WFI and WFE instructions. Therefore, using smp_call_on_cpu() to trigger target CPU to read self's AMU counters, which ensures the counters are working properly during calculation. Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 + drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index 77e841d396e5..3b746db0f40c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -1588,6 +1588,7 @@ bool cpu_has_amu_feat(int cpu) { return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &amu_cpus); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_has_amu_feat); int get_cpu_with_amu_feat(void) { diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index f29e8d0553a8..f7f3632dcf31 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -350,23 +350,37 @@ static int cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu, return cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, delivered_perf); } -static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum) +static int cppc_get_perf_ctrs_sample(void *val) { - struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0 = {0}, fb_ctrs_t1 = {0}; - struct cppc_cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpunum]; + int cpunum = smp_processor_id(); + struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *fb_ctrs = val; int ret; - ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpunum, &fb_ctrs_t0); + ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpunum, fb_ctrs); if (ret) return ret; udelay(2); /* 2usec delay between sampling */ - ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpunum, &fb_ctrs_t1); + return cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpunum, fb_ctrs + 1); +} + +static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum) +{ + struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs[2] = {0}; + struct cppc_cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpunum]; + int ret; + + if (cpu_has_amu_feat(cpunum)) + ret = smp_call_on_cpu(cpunum, cppc_get_perf_ctrs_sample, + fb_ctrs, false); + else + ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs_sample(fb_ctrs); + if (ret) return ret; - return cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(cpu, fb_ctrs_t0, fb_ctrs_t1); + return cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(cpu, fb_ctrs[0], fb_ctrs[1]); } static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) -- 2.25.1
-
Zeng Heng