[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/2] Fix CVE-2025-40190
Fix CVE-2025-40190 Ahmet Eray Karadag (1): ext4: guard against EA inode refcount underflow in xattr update Wojciech Gładysz (1): ext4: nested locking for xattr inode fs/ext4/xattr.c | 19 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.39.2
From: Wojciech Gładysz <wojciech.gladysz@infogain.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.227 commit c2097d5efb196d7d52aba2eb6e825b4ac34ad58d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/ICXMCD CVE: CVE-2025-40190 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit d1bc560e9a9c78d0b2314692847fc8661e0aeb99 ] Add nested locking with I_MUTEX_XATTR subclass to avoid lockdep warning while handling xattr inode on file open syscall at ext4_xattr_inode_iget. Backtrace EXT4-fs (loop0): Ignoring removed oldalloc option ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.10.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor543/2794 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880215e1a48 (&ea_inode->i_rwsem#7/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:782 [inline] ffff8880215e1a48 (&ea_inode->i_rwsem#7/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ext4_xattr_inode_iget+0x42a/0x5c0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:425 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880215e3278 (&ei->i_data_sem/3){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_setattr+0x136d/0x19c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5559 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&ei->i_data_sem/3){++++}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x197/0x480 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5566 down_write+0x93/0x180 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1564 ext4_update_i_disksize fs/ext4/ext4.h:3267 [inline] ext4_xattr_inode_write fs/ext4/xattr.c:1390 [inline] ext4_xattr_inode_lookup_create fs/ext4/xattr.c:1538 [inline] ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x331a/0x3d80 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1662 ext4_xattr_ibody_set+0x124/0x390 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2228 ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xc27/0x14e0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2385 ext4_xattr_set+0x219/0x390 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2498 ext4_xattr_user_set+0xc9/0xf0 fs/ext4/xattr_user.c:40 __vfs_setxattr+0x404/0x450 fs/xattr.c:177 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x11d/0x4f0 fs/xattr.c:208 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1f9/0x210 fs/xattr.c:266 vfs_setxattr+0x112/0x2c0 fs/xattr.c:283 setxattr+0x1db/0x3e0 fs/xattr.c:548 path_setxattr+0x15a/0x240 fs/xattr.c:567 __do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:582 [inline] __se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:578 [inline] __x64_sys_setxattr+0xc5/0xe0 fs/xattr.c:578 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:62 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb -> #0 (&ea_inode->i_rwsem#7/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2988 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline] validate_chain+0x1695/0x58f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3729 __lock_acquire+0x12fd/0x20d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4955 lock_acquire+0x197/0x480 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5566 down_write+0x93/0x180 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1564 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:782 [inline] ext4_xattr_inode_iget+0x42a/0x5c0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:425 ext4_xattr_inode_get+0x138/0x410 fs/ext4/xattr.c:485 ext4_xattr_move_to_block fs/ext4/xattr.c:2580 [inline] ext4_xattr_make_inode_space fs/ext4/xattr.c:2682 [inline] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0xe70/0x1bb0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2774 __ext4_expand_extra_isize+0x304/0x3f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5898 ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize fs/ext4/inode.c:5941 [inline] __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x591/0x810 fs/ext4/inode.c:6018 ext4_setattr+0x1400/0x19c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5562 notify_change+0xbb6/0xe60 fs/attr.c:435 do_truncate+0x1de/0x2c0 fs/open.c:64 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:2970 [inline] do_open fs/namei.c:3311 [inline] path_openat+0x29f3/0x3290 fs/namei.c:3425 do_filp_open+0x20b/0x450 fs/namei.c:3452 do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x460 fs/open.c:1207 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1223 [inline] __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1231 [inline] __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1227 [inline] __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1227 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:62 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ei->i_data_sem/3); lock(&ea_inode->i_rwsem#7/1); lock(&ei->i_data_sem/3); lock(&ea_inode->i_rwsem#7/1); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by syz-executor543/2794: #0: ffff888026fbc448 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x4a/0x2a0 fs/namespace.c:365 #1: ffff8880215e3488 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:782 [inline] #1: ffff8880215e3488 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){++++}-{3:3}, at: do_truncate+0x1cf/0x2c0 fs/open.c:62 #2: ffff8880215e3310 (&ei->i_mmap_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_setattr+0xec4/0x19c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5519 #3: ffff8880215e3278 (&ei->i_data_sem/3){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_setattr+0x136d/0x19c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5559 #4: ffff8880215e30c8 (&ei->xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_write_trylock_xattr fs/ext4/xattr.h:162 [inline] #4: ffff8880215e30c8 (&ei->xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize fs/ext4/inode.c:5938 [inline] #4: ffff8880215e30c8 (&ei->xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x4fb/0x810 fs/ext4/inode.c:6018 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 2794 Comm: syz-executor543 Not tainted 5.10.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x177/0x211 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_circular_bug+0x146/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2002 check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x390 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2123 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2988 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline] validate_chain+0x1695/0x58f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3729 __lock_acquire+0x12fd/0x20d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4955 lock_acquire+0x197/0x480 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5566 down_write+0x93/0x180 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1564 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:782 [inline] ext4_xattr_inode_iget+0x42a/0x5c0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:425 ext4_xattr_inode_get+0x138/0x410 fs/ext4/xattr.c:485 ext4_xattr_move_to_block fs/ext4/xattr.c:2580 [inline] ext4_xattr_make_inode_space fs/ext4/xattr.c:2682 [inline] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0xe70/0x1bb0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2774 __ext4_expand_extra_isize+0x304/0x3f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5898 ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize fs/ext4/inode.c:5941 [inline] __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x591/0x810 fs/ext4/inode.c:6018 ext4_setattr+0x1400/0x19c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:5562 notify_change+0xbb6/0xe60 fs/attr.c:435 do_truncate+0x1de/0x2c0 fs/open.c:64 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:2970 [inline] do_open fs/namei.c:3311 [inline] path_openat+0x29f3/0x3290 fs/namei.c:3425 do_filp_open+0x20b/0x450 fs/namei.c:3452 do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x460 fs/open.c:1207 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1223 [inline] __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1231 [inline] __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1227 [inline] __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1227 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:62 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb RIP: 0033:0x7f0cde4ea229 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 21 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffd81d1c978 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0030656c69662f30 RCX: 00007f0cde4ea229 RDX: 0000000000000089 RSI: 00000000000a0a00 RDI: 00000000200001c0 RBP: 2f30656c69662f2e R08: 0000000000208000 R09: 0000000000208000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffd81d1c9c0 R13: 00007ffd81d1ca00 R14: 0000000000080000 R15: 0000000000000003 EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea:2730: inode #13: comm syz-executor543: corrupted in-inode xattr Signed-off-by: Wojciech Gładysz <wojciech.gladysz@infogain.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240801143827.19135-1-wojciech.gladysz@infogain.co... Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c index 3e5efa68698e..bacd36b78134 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_iget(struct inode *parent, unsigned long ea_ino, ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_LUSTRE_EA_INODE); ext4_xattr_inode_set_ref(inode, 1); } else { - inode_lock(inode); + inode_lock_nested(inode, I_MUTEX_XATTR); inode->i_flags |= S_NOQUOTA; inode_unlock(inode); } @@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref(handle_t *handle, struct inode *ea_inode, s64 ref_count; int ret; - inode_lock(ea_inode); + inode_lock_nested(ea_inode, I_MUTEX_XATTR); ret = ext4_reserve_inode_write(handle, ea_inode, &iloc); if (ret) -- 2.39.2
From: Ahmet Eray Karadag <eraykrdg1@gmail.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.246 commit 1cfb3e4ddbdc8e02e637b8852540bd4718bf4814 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/ICXMCD CVE: CVE-2025-40190 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit 57295e835408d8d425bef58da5253465db3d6888 upstream. syzkaller found a path where ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref() reads an EA inode refcount that is already <= 0 and then applies ref_change (often -1). That lets the refcount underflow and we proceed with a bogus value, triggering errors like: EXT4-fs error: EA inode <n> ref underflow: ref_count=-1 ref_change=-1 EXT4-fs warning: ea_inode dec ref err=-117 Make the invariant explicit: if the current refcount is non-positive, treat this as on-disk corruption, emit ext4_error_inode(), and fail the operation with -EFSCORRUPTED instead of updating the refcount. Delete the WARN_ONCE() as negative refcounts are now impossible; keep error reporting in ext4_error_inode(). This prevents the underflow and the follow-on orphan/cleanup churn. Reported-by: syzbot+0be4f339a8218d2a5bb1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: https://syzbot.org/bug?extid=0be4f339a8218d2a5bb1 Cc: stable@kernel.org Co-developed-by: Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Albin Babu Varghese <albinbabuvarghese20@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ahmet Eray Karadag <eraykrdg1@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20250920021342.45575-1-eraykrdg1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Mingrui <liumingrui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c index bacd36b78134..4e25463db664 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c @@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref(handle_t *handle, struct inode *ea_inode, int ref_change) { struct ext4_iloc iloc; - s64 ref_count; + u64 ref_count; int ret; inode_lock_nested(ea_inode, I_MUTEX_XATTR); @@ -993,13 +993,17 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref(handle_t *handle, struct inode *ea_inode, goto out; ref_count = ext4_xattr_inode_get_ref(ea_inode); + if ((ref_count == 0 && ref_change < 0) || (ref_count == U64_MAX && ref_change > 0)) { + ext4_error_inode(ea_inode, __func__, __LINE__, 0, + "EA inode %lu ref wraparound: ref_count=%lld ref_change=%d", + ea_inode->i_ino, ref_count, ref_change); + ret = -EFSCORRUPTED; + goto out; + } ref_count += ref_change; ext4_xattr_inode_set_ref(ea_inode, ref_count); if (ref_change > 0) { - WARN_ONCE(ref_count <= 0, "EA inode %lu ref_count=%lld", - ea_inode->i_ino, ref_count); - if (ref_count == 1) { WARN_ONCE(ea_inode->i_nlink, "EA inode %lu i_nlink=%u", ea_inode->i_ino, ea_inode->i_nlink); @@ -1008,9 +1012,6 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_update_ref(handle_t *handle, struct inode *ea_inode, ext4_orphan_del(handle, ea_inode); } } else { - WARN_ONCE(ref_count < 0, "EA inode %lu ref_count=%lld", - ea_inode->i_ino, ref_count); - if (ref_count == 0) { WARN_ONCE(ea_inode->i_nlink != 1, "EA inode %lu i_nlink=%u", -- 2.39.2
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/19537 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/7FO... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/19537 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/7FO...
participants (2)
-
patchwork bot -
Zizhi Wo