From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.261 commit 087d5b8b501c570f84bf655164e6698c3ce146e0 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/16673 CVE: CVE-2026-64378 Reference: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit cba38ec4cbd3a7b8b942a8d52531a05be8a9ff0d ] When a container exits, the following BUG_ON() is occasionally triggered: ================================================================== VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb (ext4) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/super.c:695! CPU: 3 PID: 6 Comm: containerd-shim Tainted: G OE K 6.6 #1 pstate: 63400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100 lr : generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100 Call trace: generic_shutdown_super+0xf0/0x100 kill_block_super+0x20/0x48 ext4_kill_sb+0x28/0x60 deactivate_locked_super+0x54/0x130 deactivate_super+0x84/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0xa4/0x140 __cleanup_mnt+0x18/0x28 task_work_run+0x78/0xe0 do_notify_resume+0x204/0x240 ================================================================== The root cause is a race between cgroup_writeback_umount() and inode_switch_wbs()/cleanup_offline_cgwb(). There is a window between inode_prepare_wbs_switch() returning true and the subsequent wb_queue_isw() call. Following is the process that triggers the issue: CPU A (umount) | CPU B (writeback) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ inode_switch_wbs/cleanup_offline_cgwb atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight) inode_prepare_wbs_switch -> passes SB_ACTIVE check __iget(inode) generic_shutdown_super sb->s_flags &= ~SB_ACTIVE cgroup_writeback_umount(sb) smp_mb() atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight) rcu_barrier() -> no pending RCU callbacks flush_workqueue(isw_wq) -> nothing queued, returns evict_inodes(sb) -> Inode skipped as isw still holds a ref. sop->put_super(sb) /* destroys percpu counters */ -> VFS: Busy inodes after unmount! wb_queue_isw() queue_work(isw_wq, ...) /* later in work function */ inode_switch_wbs_work_fn process_inode_switch_wbs iput() -> evict percpu_counter_dec() // UAF! Fix this by extending the RCU read-side critical section in inode_switch_wbs() and cleanup_offline_cgwb() to cover from inode_prepare_wbs_switch() through wb_queue_isw(). Since there is no sleep in this window, rcu_read_lock() can be used. Then add a synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount() before the existing rcu_barrier(), so that all in-flight switchers that have passed the SB_ACTIVE check have completed queue_work() before flush_workqueue() is called. The existing rcu_barrier() is intentionally retained so this fix can be backported unchanged to stable kernels (5.10.y, 6.6.y, ...) that still queue switches via queue_rcu_work(). It is a no-op on current mainline (since commit e1b849cfa6b6 ("writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes")) and is removed in a follow-up patch. Fixes: a1a0e23e4903 ("writeback: flush inode cgroup wb switches instead of pinning super_block") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/mxnjq2l6guusfchvauxr3v7c4bwjasybxlleqbbh4efloeqs... Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260521095016.2791354-2-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Conflicts: fs/fs-writeback.c [Simple context conflicts, not affect this patch.] Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com> --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index cfae82a0b4ae..932e2e1c7862 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -503,16 +503,23 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id) isw = kzalloc(sizeof(*isw), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!isw) return; - /* find and pin the new wb */ + /* + * Paired with synchronize_rcu() in cgroup_writeback_umount(): + * holding rcu_read_lock across inode_prepare_wbs_switch() + * (covering the SB_ACTIVE check and the inode grab) and + * wb_queue_isw() ensures synchronize_rcu() cannot return until + * the work is queued, so the subsequent flush_workqueue() will + * wait for the switch. + */ rcu_read_lock(); + /* find and pin the new wb */ memcg_css = css_from_id(new_wb_id, &memory_cgrp_subsys); if (memcg_css && !css_tryget(memcg_css)) memcg_css = NULL; - rcu_read_unlock(); if (!memcg_css) goto out_free; isw->new_wb = wb_get_create(bdi, memcg_css, GFP_ATOMIC); css_put(memcg_css); @@ -540,13 +547,15 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id) * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible. */ call_rcu(&isw->rcu_head, inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn); atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight); + rcu_read_unlock(); return; out_free: + rcu_read_unlock(); if (isw->new_wb) wb_put(isw->new_wb); kfree(isw); } @@ -919,10 +928,18 @@ static void bdi_split_work_to_wbs(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, * flushing iff wb switches are in flight. */ void cgroup_writeback_umount(void) { if (atomic_read(&isw_nr_in_flight)) { + /* + * Paired with rcu_read_lock() in inode_switch_wbs(). + * synchronize_rcu() waits for any in-flight switcher that + * already passed the SB_ACTIVE check to finish calling + * call_rcu(), so the rcu_barrier() and flush_workqueue() + * below will then drain it. + */ + synchronize_rcu(); /* * Use rcu_barrier() to wait for all pending callbacks to * ensure that all in-flight wb switches are in the workqueue. */ rcu_barrier(); -- 2.52.0