[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/2] CVE-2025-37834
Jinjiang Tu (2): mm/vmscan: don't try to reclaim hwpoison folio mm/vmscan: fix hwpoisoned large folio handling in shrink_folio_list mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) -- 2.43.0
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.15-rc1 commit 1b0449544c6482179ac84530b61fc192a6527bfd category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IC6BDN CVE: CVE-2025-37834 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- Syzkaller reports a bug as follows: Injecting memory failure for pfn 0x18b00e at process virtual address 0x20ffd000 Memory failure: 0x18b00e: dirty swapcache page still referenced by 2 users Memory failure: 0x18b00e: recovery action for dirty swapcache page: Failed page: refcount:2 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x20ffd pfn:0x18b00e memcg:ffff0000dd6d9000 anon flags: 0x5ffffe00482011(locked|dirty|arch_1|swapbacked|hwpoison|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xfffff) raw: 005ffffe00482011 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff0000e232a7c9 raw: 0000000000020ffd 0000000000000000 00000002ffffffff ffff0000dd6d9000 page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_uptodate(folio)) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/swap_state.c:184! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 60 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.6.0-gcb097e7de84e #3 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : add_to_swap+0xbc/0x158 lr : add_to_swap+0xbc/0x158 sp : ffff800087f37340 x29: ffff800087f37340 x28: fffffc00052c0380 x27: ffff800087f37780 x26: ffff800087f37490 x25: ffff800087f37c78 x24: ffff800087f377a0 x23: ffff800087f37c50 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: fffffc00052c03b4 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: fffffc00052c0380 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 296f696c6f662865 x16: 7461646f7470755f x15: 747365745f6f696c x14: 6f6621284f494c4f x13: 0000000000000001 x12: ffff600036d8b97b x11: 1fffe00036d8b97a x10: ffff600036d8b97a x9 : dfff800000000000 x8 : 00009fffc9274686 x7 : ffff0001b6c5cbd3 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff0000c25896c0 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff0000c25896c0 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: add_to_swap+0xbc/0x158 shrink_folio_list+0x12ac/0x2648 shrink_inactive_list+0x318/0x948 shrink_lruvec+0x450/0x720 shrink_node_memcgs+0x280/0x4a8 shrink_node+0x128/0x978 balance_pgdat+0x4f0/0xb20 kswapd+0x228/0x438 kthread+0x214/0x230 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 I can reproduce this issue with the following steps: 1) When a dirty swapcache page is isolated by reclaim process and the page isn't locked, inject memory failure for the page. me_swapcache_dirty() clears uptodate flag and tries to delete from lru, but fails. Reclaim process will put the hwpoisoned page back to lru. 2) The process that maps the hwpoisoned page exits, the page is deleted the page will never be freed and will be in the lru forever. 3) If we trigger a reclaim again and tries to reclaim the page, add_to_swap() will trigger VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO due to the uptodate flag is cleared. To fix it, skip the hwpoisoned page in shrink_folio_list(). Besides, the hwpoison folio may not be unmapped by hwpoison_user_mappings() yet, unmap it in shrink_folio_list(), otherwise the folio will fail to be unmaped by hwpoison_user_mappings() since the folio isn't in lru list. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250318083939.987651-3-tujinjiang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com> Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger,kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: mm/vmscan.c [Many conflicts, fix it with same idea.] Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com> --- mm/vmscan.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 08213f1c18ee..1374d46a1b5c 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1327,6 +1327,13 @@ static unsigned int shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, if (!trylock_page(page)) goto keep; + if (PageHWPoison(page)) { + try_to_unmap(page, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK); + unlock_page(page); + put_page(page); + continue; + } + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageActive(page), page); nr_pages = compound_nr(page); -- 2.43.0
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.16 commit 9f1e8cd0b7c4c944e9921b52a6661b5eda2705ab category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IC6BDN CVE: CVE-2025-37834 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- In shrink_folio_list(), the hwpoisoned folio may be large folio, which can't be handled by unmap_poisoned_folio(). For THP, try_to_unmap_one() must be passed with TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD to split huge PMD first and then retry. Without TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD, we will trigger null-ptr deref of pvmw.pte. Even we passed TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD, we will trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE due to the page isn't in swapcache. Since UCE is rare in real world, and race with reclaimation is more rare, just skipping the hwpoisoned large folio is enough. memory_failure() will handle it if the UCE is triggered again. This happens when memory reclaim for large folio races with memory_failure(), and will lead to kernel panic. The race is as follows: cpu0 cpu1 shrink_folio_list memory_failure TestSetPageHWPoison unmap_poisoned_folio --> trigger BUG_ON due to unmap_poisoned_folio couldn't handle large folio [tujinjiang@huawei.com: add comment to unmap_poisoned_folio()] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/69fd4e00-1b13-d5f7-1c82-705c7d977ea4@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250627125747.3094074-2-tujinjiang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com> Fixes: 1b0449544c64 ("mm/vmscan: don't try to reclaim hwpoison folio") Reported-by: syzbot+3b220254df55d8ca8a61@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/68412d57.050a0220.2461cf.000e.GAE@google.com/ Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: mm/vmscan.c mm/memory-failure.c [Conflicts due to folio isn't introduced.] Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com> --- mm/vmscan.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 1374d46a1b5c..e82d7995b548 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1328,6 +1328,9 @@ static unsigned int shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, goto keep; if (PageHWPoison(page)) { + if (PageTransHuge(page)) + goto keep_locked; + try_to_unmap(page, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK); unlock_page(page); put_page(page); -- 2.43.0
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/17759 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/GG6... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/17759 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/GG6...
participants (2)
-
Jinjiang Tu -
patchwork bot