[PATCH kernel-4.19 1/3] mm/filemap.c: fix a data race in filemap_fault()
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.9-rc1 commit e630bfac79456d3acd22c9286b50e83aafb7a07c category: bugfix bugzilla: 41542 CVE: NA ----------------------------------------------- struct file_ra_state ra.mmap_miss could be accessed concurrently during page faults as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in filemap_fault / filemap_map_pages write to 0xffff9b1700a2c1b4 of 4 bytes by task 3292 on cpu 30: filemap_fault+0x920/0xfc0 do_sync_mmap_readahead at mm/filemap.c:2384 (inlined by) filemap_fault at mm/filemap.c:2486 __xfs_filemap_fault+0x112/0x3e0 [xfs] xfs_filemap_fault+0x74/0x90 [xfs] __do_fault+0x9e/0x220 do_fault+0x4a0/0x920 __handle_mm_fault+0xc69/0xd00 handle_mm_fault+0xfc/0x2f0 do_page_fault+0x263/0x6f9 page_fault+0x34/0x40 read to 0xffff9b1700a2c1b4 of 4 bytes by task 3313 on cpu 32: filemap_map_pages+0xc2e/0xd80 filemap_map_pages at mm/filemap.c:2625 do_fault+0x3da/0x920 __handle_mm_fault+0xc69/0xd00 handle_mm_fault+0xfc/0x2f0 do_page_fault+0x263/0x6f9 page_fault+0x34/0x40 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 32 PID: 3313 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G W L 5.5.0-next-20200210+ #1 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 ra.mmap_miss is used to contribute the readahead decisions, a data race could be undesirable. Both the read and write is only under non-exclusive mmap_sem, two concurrent writers could even underflow the counter. Fix the underflow by writing to a local variable before committing a final store to ra.mmap_miss given a small inaccuracy of the counter should be acceptable. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211030134.1847-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: mm/filemap.c [Peng Liu: cherry-pick from e630bfac79456d3acd22c9286b50e83aafb7a07c] Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: tong tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> --- mm/filemap.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index 5c33c40e80192..4cf4b096d5b63 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -2528,6 +2528,7 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t offset) { struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping; + unsigned int mmap_miss; /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ) @@ -2542,14 +2543,15 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma, } /* Avoid banging the cache line if not needed */ - if (ra->mmap_miss < MMAP_LOTSAMISS * 10) - ra->mmap_miss++; + mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss); + if (mmap_miss < MMAP_LOTSAMISS * 10) + WRITE_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss, ++mmap_miss); /* * Do we miss much more than hit in this file? If so, * stop bothering with read-ahead. It will only hurt. */ - if (ra->mmap_miss > MMAP_LOTSAMISS) + if (mmap_miss > MMAP_LOTSAMISS) return; /* @@ -2572,12 +2574,14 @@ static void do_async_mmap_readahead(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t offset) { struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping; + unsigned int mmap_miss; /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ) return; - if (ra->mmap_miss > 0) - ra->mmap_miss--; + mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss); + if (mmap_miss) + WRITE_ONCE(ra->mmap_miss, --mmap_miss); if (PageReadahead(page)) page_cache_async_readahead(mapping, ra, file, page, offset, ra->ra_pages); @@ -2737,6 +2741,7 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf, pgoff_t last_pgoff = start_pgoff; unsigned long max_idx; struct page *head, *page; + unsigned int mmap_miss = READ_ONCE(file->f_ra.mmap_miss); rcu_read_lock(); radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->i_pages, &iter, start_pgoff) { @@ -2784,8 +2789,8 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf, if (page->index >= max_idx) goto unlock; - if (file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0) - file->f_ra.mmap_miss--; + if (mmap_miss > 0) + mmap_miss--; vmf->address += (iter.index - last_pgoff) << PAGE_SHIFT; if (vmf->pte) @@ -2807,6 +2812,7 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf, break; } rcu_read_unlock(); + WRITE_ONCE(file->f_ra.mmap_miss, mmap_miss); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_map_pages); -- 2.25.1
From: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.9-rc1 commit f27ce0e14088b23f8d54ae4a44f70307ec420e64 category: bugfix bugzilla: 41086 CVE: NA ----------------------------------------------- zone_watermark_fast was introduced by commit 48ee5f3696f6 ("mm, page_alloc: shortcut watermark checks for order-0 pages"). The commit simply checks if free pages is bigger than watermark without additional calculation such like reducing watermark. It considered free cma pages but it did not consider highatomic reserved. This may incur exhaustion of free pages except high order atomic free pages. Assume that reserved_highatomic pageblock is bigger than watermark min, and there are only few free pages except high order atomic free. Because zone_watermark_fast passes the allocation without considering high order atomic free, normal reclaimable allocation like GFP_HIGHUSER will consume all the free pages. Then finally order-0 atomic allocation may fail on allocation. This means watermark min is not protected against non-atomic allocation. The order-0 atomic allocation with ALLOC_HARDER unwantedly can be failed. Additionally the __GFP_MEMALLOC allocation with ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS also can be failed. To avoid the problem, zone_watermark_fast should consider highatomic reserve. If the actual size of high atomic free is counted accurately like cma free, we may use it. On this patch just use nr_reserved_highatomic. Additionally introduce __zone_watermark_unusable_free to factor out common parts between zone_watermark_fast and __zone_watermark_ok. This is an example of ALLOC_HARDER allocation failure using v4.19 based kernel. Binder:9343_3: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x480020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null) Call trace: [<ffffff8008f40f8c>] dump_stack+0xb8/0xf0 [<ffffff8008223320>] warn_alloc+0xd8/0x12c [<ffffff80082245e4>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x120c/0x1250 [<ffffff800827f6e8>] new_slab+0x128/0x604 [<ffffff800827b0cc>] ___slab_alloc+0x508/0x670 [<ffffff800827ba00>] __kmalloc+0x2f8/0x310 [<ffffff80084ac3e0>] context_struct_to_string+0x104/0x1cc [<ffffff80084ad8fc>] security_sid_to_context_core+0x74/0x144 [<ffffff80084ad880>] security_sid_to_context+0x10/0x18 [<ffffff800849bd80>] selinux_secid_to_secctx+0x20/0x28 [<ffffff800849109c>] security_secid_to_secctx+0x3c/0x70 [<ffffff8008bfe118>] binder_transaction+0xe68/0x454c Mem-Info: active_anon:102061 inactive_anon:81551 isolated_anon:0 active_file:59102 inactive_file:68924 isolated_file:64 unevictable:611 dirty:63 writeback:0 unstable:0 slab_reclaimable:13324 slab_unreclaimable:44354 mapped:83015 shmem:4858 pagetables:26316 bounce:0 free:2727 free_pcp:1035 free_cma:178 Node 0 active_anon:408244kB inactive_anon:326204kB active_file:236408kB inactive_file:275696kB unevictable:2444kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):256kB mapped:332060kB dirty:252kB writeback:0kB shmem:19432kB writeback_tmp:0kB unstable:0kB all_unreclaimable? no Normal free:10908kB min:6192kB low:44388kB high:47060kB active_anon:409160kB inactive_anon:325924kB active_file:235820kB inactive_file:276628kB unevictable:2444kB writepending:252kB present:3076096kB managed:2673676kB mlocked:2444kB kernel_stack:62512kB pagetables:105264kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:4140kB local_pcp:40kB free_cma:712kB lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 Normal: 505*4kB (H) 357*8kB (H) 201*16kB (H) 65*32kB (H) 1*64kB (H) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 10236kB 138826 total pagecache pages 5460 pages in swap cache Swap cache stats: add 8273090, delete 8267506, find 1004381/4060142 This is an example of ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS allocation failure using v4.14 based kernel. kswapd0: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x140000a(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_MOVABLE), nodemask=(null) kswapd0 cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0 CPU: 4 PID: 1221 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 4.14.113-18770262-userdebug #1 Call trace: [<0000000000000000>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x248 [<0000000000000000>] show_stack+0x18/0x20 [<0000000000000000>] __dump_stack+0x20/0x28 [<0000000000000000>] dump_stack+0x68/0x90 [<0000000000000000>] warn_alloc+0x104/0x198 [<0000000000000000>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xdc0/0xdf0 [<0000000000000000>] zs_malloc+0x148/0x3d0 [<0000000000000000>] zram_bvec_rw+0x410/0x798 [<0000000000000000>] zram_rw_page+0x88/0xdc [<0000000000000000>] bdev_write_page+0x70/0xbc [<0000000000000000>] __swap_writepage+0x58/0x37c [<0000000000000000>] swap_writepage+0x40/0x4c [<0000000000000000>] shrink_page_list+0xc30/0xf48 [<0000000000000000>] shrink_inactive_list+0x2b0/0x61c [<0000000000000000>] shrink_node_memcg+0x23c/0x618 [<0000000000000000>] shrink_node+0x1c8/0x304 [<0000000000000000>] kswapd+0x680/0x7c4 [<0000000000000000>] kthread+0x110/0x120 [<0000000000000000>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Mem-Info: active_anon:111826 inactive_anon:65557 isolated_anon:0\x0a active_file:44260 inactive_file:83422 isolated_file:0\x0a unevictable:4158 dirty:117 writeback:0 unstable:0\x0a slab_reclaimable:13943 slab_unreclaimable:43315\x0a mapped:102511 shmem:3299 pagetables:19566 bounce:0\x0a free:3510 free_pcp:553 free_cma:0 Node 0 active_anon:447304kB inactive_anon:262228kB active_file:177040kB inactive_file:333688kB unevictable:16632kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB mapped:410044kB d irty:468kB writeback:0kB shmem:13196kB writeback_tmp:0kB unstable:0kB all_unreclaimable? no Normal free:14040kB min:7440kB low:94500kB high:98136kB reserved_highatomic:32768KB active_anon:447336kB inactive_anon:261668kB active_file:177572kB inactive_file:333768k B unevictable:16632kB writepending:480kB present:4081664kB managed:3637088kB mlocked:16632kB kernel_stack:47072kB pagetables:78264kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:2280kB local_pcp:720kB free_cma:0kB [ 4738.329607] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 Normal: 860*4kB (H) 453*8kB (H) 180*16kB (H) 26*32kB (H) 34*64kB (H) 6*128kB (H) 2*256kB (H) 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 14232kB This is trace log which shows GFP_HIGHUSER consumes free pages right before ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS. <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213383: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000d2be5665 pfn=970744 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213385: mm_page_alloc: page=000000004b2335c2 pfn=970745 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213387: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000017272e1 pfn=970278 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213389: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000c4be79fb pfn=970279 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213391: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000f8a51d4f pfn=970260 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213393: mm_page_alloc: page=000000006ba8f5ac pfn=970261 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213395: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000819f1cd3 pfn=970196 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213396: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000f6b72a64 pfn=970197 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO kswapd0-1207 [005] ...1 889.213398: mm_page_alloc: page= (null) pfn=0 order=0 migratetype=1 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_NOWAIT|__GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_MOVABLE [jaewon31.kim@samsung.com: remove redundant code for high-order] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200623035242.27232-1-jaewon31.kim@samsung.com Reported-by: Yong-Taek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com> Suggested-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Yong-Taek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200619235958.11283-1-jaewon31.kim@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: mm/page_alloc.c [Peng Liu: cherry-pick from f27ce0e14088b23f8d54ae4a44f70307ec420e64] Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: tong tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> --- mm/page_alloc.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 856353b5de599..12e0899f3b9c8 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -3211,6 +3211,29 @@ static inline bool should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) #endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC */ +static inline long __zone_watermark_unusable_free(struct zone *z, + unsigned int order, unsigned int alloc_flags) +{ + const bool alloc_harder = (alloc_flags & (ALLOC_HARDER|ALLOC_OOM)); + long unusable_free = (1 << order) - 1; + + /* + * If the caller does not have rights to ALLOC_HARDER then subtract + * the high-atomic reserves. This will over-estimate the size of the + * atomic reserve but it avoids a search. + */ + if (likely(!alloc_harder)) + unusable_free += z->nr_reserved_highatomic; + +#ifdef CONFIG_CMA + /* If allocation can't use CMA areas don't use free CMA pages */ + if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA)) + unusable_free += zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES); +#endif + + return unusable_free; +} + /* * Return true if free base pages are above 'mark'. For high-order checks it * will return true of the order-0 watermark is reached and there is at least @@ -3226,19 +3249,12 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, unsigned long mark, const bool alloc_harder = (alloc_flags & (ALLOC_HARDER|ALLOC_OOM)); /* free_pages may go negative - that's OK */ - free_pages -= (1 << order) - 1; + free_pages -= __zone_watermark_unusable_free(z, order, alloc_flags); if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGH) min -= min / 2; - /* - * If the caller does not have rights to ALLOC_HARDER then subtract - * the high-atomic reserves. This will over-estimate the size of the - * atomic reserve but it avoids a search. - */ - if (likely(!alloc_harder)) { - free_pages -= z->nr_reserved_highatomic; - } else { + if (unlikely(alloc_harder)) { /* * OOM victims can try even harder than normal ALLOC_HARDER * users on the grounds that it's definitely going to be in @@ -3251,13 +3267,6 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, unsigned long mark, min -= min / 4; } - -#ifdef CONFIG_CMA - /* If allocation can't use CMA areas don't use free CMA pages */ - if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA)) - free_pages -= zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES); -#endif - /* * Check watermarks for an order-0 allocation request. If these * are not met, then a high-order request also cannot go ahead @@ -3304,28 +3313,26 @@ bool zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, unsigned long mark, } static inline bool zone_watermark_fast(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, - unsigned long mark, int classzone_idx, unsigned int alloc_flags) + unsigned long mark, int highest_zoneidx, unsigned int alloc_flags) { - long free_pages = zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_PAGES); - long cma_pages = 0; + long free_pages; -#ifdef CONFIG_CMA - /* If allocation can't use CMA areas don't use free CMA pages */ - if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA)) - cma_pages = zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES); -#endif + free_pages = zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_PAGES); /* * Fast check for order-0 only. If this fails then the reserves - * need to be calculated. There is a corner case where the check - * passes but only the high-order atomic reserve are free. If - * the caller is !atomic then it'll uselessly search the free - * list. That corner case is then slower but it is harmless. + * need to be calculated. */ - if (!order && (free_pages - cma_pages) > mark + z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx]) - return true; + if (!order) { + long fast_free; - return __zone_watermark_ok(z, order, mark, classzone_idx, alloc_flags, + fast_free = free_pages; + fast_free -= __zone_watermark_unusable_free(z, 0, alloc_flags); + if (fast_free > mark + z->lowmem_reserve[highest_zoneidx]) + return true; + } + + return __zone_watermark_ok(z, order, mark, highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags, free_pages); } -- 2.25.1
From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.13-rc1 commit 655c447c97d7fe462e6cd9e15809037be028bc70 category: bugfix bugzilla: 71819 CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- In arm_smmu_gerror_handler(), the value of the SMMU_GERROR register is filtered by GERROR_ERR_MASK. However, the GERROR_ERR_MASK does not contain the SFM bit. As a result, the subsequent error processing is not performed when only the SFM error occurs. Fixes: 48ec83bcbcf5 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Add initial driver support for ARM SMMUv3 devices") Reported-by: Rui Zhu <zhurui3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210324081603.1074-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: tong tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c index cc1db70646ad7..292fd9a10c7ff 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ #define GERROR_PRIQ_ABT_ERR (1 << 3) #define GERROR_EVTQ_ABT_ERR (1 << 2) #define GERROR_CMDQ_ERR (1 << 0) -#define GERROR_ERR_MASK 0xfd +#define GERROR_ERR_MASK 0x1fd #define ARM_SMMU_GERRORN 0x64 -- 2.25.1
participants (1)
-
Yang Yingliang