[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/2] arm64/mpam: Add early_param for MPAM detecting
Zeng Heng (2): Revert "arm64: head.S: Initialise MPAM EL2 registers and disable traps" arm64/mpam: Add early_param for MPAM detecting arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 9 +++++++ arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 16 ------------ arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 13 +++++++--- arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1
hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9OXPO -------------------------------- This reverts commit a01fda352718f178db2effe5e9d2c1b6a5602356. If BIOS firmware doesn't enable MPAM function under EL3 environment, while the hardware has the MPAM ability, that would cause illegal instruction fault when access MPAM registers. It should be noted that this will bring potential risks to Kdump. If the previous kernel has an unhandled MPAM exception interrupt, it would cause Kdump crash after re-enable interrupt capability. Fixes: a01fda352718 ("arm64: head.S: Initialise MPAM EL2 registers and disable traps") Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h index 3dc7c58d55b6..e4546b29dd0c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h @@ -209,21 +209,6 @@ msr spsr_el2, x0 .endm -.macro __init_el2_mpam -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MPAM - /* Memory Partioning And Monitoring: disable EL2 traps */ - mrs x1, id_aa64pfr0_el1 - ubfx x0, x1, #ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_MPAM_SHIFT, #4 - cbz x0, .Lskip_mpam_\@ // skip if no MPAM - msr_s SYS_MPAM2_EL2, xzr // use the default partition - // and disable lower traps - mrs_s x0, SYS_MPAMIDR_EL1 - tbz x0, #17, .Lskip_mpam_\@ // skip if no MPAMHCR reg - msr_s SYS_MPAMHCR_EL2, xzr // clear TRAP_MPAMIDR_EL1 -> EL2 -.Lskip_mpam_\@: -#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_MPAM */ -.endm - /** * Initialize EL2 registers to sane values. This should be called early on all * cores that were booted in EL2. Note that everything gets initialised as @@ -241,7 +226,6 @@ __init_el2_stage2 __init_el2_gicv3 __init_el2_hstr - __init_el2_mpam __init_el2_nvhe_idregs __init_el2_cptr __init_el2_fgt -- 2.25.1
hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9OXPO -------------------------------- If BIOS firmware doesn't enable MPAM function under EL3 environment, while the hardware has the MPAM ability, that would cause illegal instruction fault when access MPAM registers. Fixes: 21771eaaf93a ("arm64: cpufeature: discover CPU support for MPAM") Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 9 +++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 13 +++++++--- arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 2af4c7ad7dc5..f8ec4b20fa69 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -858,6 +858,15 @@ static inline bool cpus_support_mpam(void) cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_MPAM); } +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MPAM +bool mpam_detect_is_enabled(void); +#else +static inline bool mpam_detect_is_enabled(void) +{ + return false; +} +#endif + int do_emulate_mrs(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 sys_reg, u32 rt); bool try_emulate_mrs(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 isn); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index f94bc6eb83e0..f4f3ad670391 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -1078,8 +1078,9 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info) vec_init_vq_map(ARM64_VEC_SME); } - if (id_aa64pfr0_mpam(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0) || - id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1)) + if (mpam_detect_is_enabled() && + (id_aa64pfr0_mpam(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0) || + id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))) init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MPAMIDR_EL1, info->reg_mpamidr); if (id_aa64pfr1_mte(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1)) @@ -1341,8 +1342,9 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu, vec_update_vq_map(ARM64_VEC_SME); } - if (id_aa64pfr0_mpam(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0) || - id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1)) { + if (mpam_detect_is_enabled() && + (id_aa64pfr0_mpam(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0) || + id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))) { taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_MPAMIDR_EL1, cpu, info->reg_mpamidr, boot->reg_mpamidr); } @@ -2317,6 +2319,9 @@ test_has_mpam(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope) !id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(pfr1)) return false; + if (!mpam_detect_is_enabled()) + return false; + /* Check firmware actually enabled MPAM on this cpu. */ return (read_sysreg_s(SYS_MPAM1_EL1) & MPAM_SYSREG_EN); } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c index 5ad8d8697d56..7466b6066d87 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c @@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info) __cpuinfo_store_cpu_32bit(&info->aarch32); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MPAM) && + mpam_detect_is_enabled() && (id_aa64pfr0_mpam(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0) || id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))) info->reg_mpamidr = read_cpuid(MPAMIDR_EL1); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c index 8fd9dbdc2b01..87411609407e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mpam.c @@ -13,15 +13,45 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mpam_enabled); DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, arm64_mpam_default); DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, arm64_mpam_current); +static const struct midr_range mpam_disable_list[] = { + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_HISI_TSV110), + { /* sentinel */ } +}; + +static bool __read_mostly mpam_detect_enabled; +static int __init mpam_setup(char *str) +{ + if (!is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), mpam_disable_list)) + mpam_detect_enabled = true; + + if (!strcmp(str, "acpi")) + mpam_detect_enabled = true; + + return 0; +} +early_param("mpam", mpam_setup); + +bool mpam_detect_is_enabled(void) +{ + return mpam_detect_enabled; +} + static int __init arm64_mpam_register_cpus(void) { + u16 partid_max; + u64 mpamidr; + u8 pmg_max; + if (is_kdump_kernel()) return 0; - u64 mpamidr = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_MPAMIDR_EL1); - u16 partid_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMIDR_PARTID_MAX, mpamidr); - u8 pmg_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMIDR_PMG_MAX, mpamidr); + if (!mpam_detect_is_enabled()) + return 0; + + mpamidr = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_MPAMIDR_EL1); + partid_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMIDR_PARTID_MAX, mpamidr); + pmg_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMIDR_PMG_MAX, mpamidr); return mpam_register_requestor(partid_max, pmg_max); } -arch_initcall(arm64_mpam_register_cpus) +arch_initcall(arm64_mpam_register_cpus); -- 2.25.1
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/11658 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/J... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/11658 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/J...
participants (2)
-
patchwork bot -
Zeng Heng