From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.19-rc2 commit 6cd88243c7e03845a450795e134b488fc2afb736 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5PJ7H CVE: CVE-2022-39189 ---------------------------------------- If a vCPU is outside guest mode and is scheduled out, it might be in the process of making a memory access. A problem occurs if another vCPU uses the PV TLB flush feature during the period when the vCPU is scheduled out, and a virtual address has already been translated but has not yet been accessed, because this is equivalent to using a stale TLB entry. To avoid this, only report a vCPU as preempted if sure that the guest is at an instruction boundary. A rescheduling request will be delivered to the host physical CPU as an external interrupt, so for simplicity consider any vmexit *not* instruction boundary except for external interrupts. It would in principle be okay to report the vCPU as preempted also if it is sleeping in kvm_vcpu_block(): a TLB flush IPI will incur the vmentry/vmexit overhead unnecessarily, and optimistic spinning is also unlikely to succeed. However, leave it for later because right now kvm_vcpu_check_block() is doing memory accesses. Even though the TLB flush issue only applies to virtual memory address, it's very much preferrable to be conservative. Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> conflict: arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h arch/x86/kvm/svm.c arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c arch/x86/kvm/x86.c Signed-off-by: Guo Mengqi <guomengqi3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 3 +++ arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 6549c20c958c..7afb2cb2d42c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { u64 ia32_misc_enable_msr; u64 smbase; u64 smi_count; + bool at_instruction_boundary; bool tpr_access_reporting; u64 ia32_xss; u64 microcode_version; @@ -935,6 +936,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat { u64 utime; u64 stime; u64 gtime; + u64 preemption_reported; + u64 preemption_other; }; struct x86_instruction_info; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c index 46567343680f..f611ecdfc145 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -6205,6 +6205,9 @@ static int svm_check_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, static void svm_handle_external_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { + if (to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_INTR) + vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary = true; + local_irq_enable(); /* * We must have an instruction with interrupts enabled, so diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c index 7ab18b5a8e96..4164016cf105 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c @@ -10597,6 +10597,7 @@ static void vmx_handle_external_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) [cs]"i"(__KERNEL_CS) ); } + vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary = true; } STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(vmx_handle_external_intr); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 5da2811219ec..c61cab768d2a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -186,6 +186,8 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = { { "halt_successful_poll", VCPU_STAT(halt_successful_poll) }, { "halt_attempted_poll", VCPU_STAT(halt_attempted_poll) }, { "halt_poll_invalid", VCPU_STAT(halt_poll_invalid) }, + { "preemption_reported", VCPU_STAT(preemption_reported) }, + { "preemption_other", VCPU_STAT(preemption_other) }, { "halt_wakeup", VCPU_STAT(halt_wakeup) }, { "hypercalls", VCPU_STAT(hypercalls) }, { "request_irq", VCPU_STAT(request_irq_exits) }, @@ -231,6 +233,8 @@ struct dfx_kvm_stats_debugfs_item dfx_debugfs_entries[] = { DFX_STAT("halt_exits", halt_exits), DFX_STAT("halt_successful_poll", halt_successful_poll), DFX_STAT("halt_attempted_poll", halt_attempted_poll), + DFX_STAT("preemption_reported", preemption_reported), + DFX_STAT("preemption_other", preemption_other), DFX_STAT("halt_wakeup", halt_wakeup), DFX_STAT("request_irq", request_irq_exits), DFX_STAT("irq_exits", irq_exits), @@ -3314,6 +3318,20 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) static void kvm_steal_time_set_preempted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { + /* + * The vCPU can be marked preempted if and only if the VM-Exit was on + * an instruction boundary and will not trigger guest emulation of any + * kind (see vcpu_run). Vendor specific code controls (conservatively) + * when this is true, for example allowing the vCPU to be marked + * preempted if and only if the VM-Exit was due to a host interrupt. + */ + if (!vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary) { + vcpu->stat.preemption_other++; + return; + } + + vcpu->stat.preemption_reported++; + if (!(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED)) return; @@ -7920,6 +7938,13 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vcpu->arch.l1tf_flush_l1d = true; for (;;) { + /* + * If another guest vCPU requests a PV TLB flush in the middle + * of instruction emulation, the rest of the emulation could + * use a stale page translation. Assume that any code after + * this point can start executing an instruction. + */ + vcpu->arch.at_instruction_boundary = false; if (kvm_vcpu_running(vcpu)) { r = vcpu_enter_guest(vcpu); } else { -- 2.25.1