From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.251 commit df1a5ab0dd0775f2ea101c71f2addbc4c0ea0f85 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBP60S CVE: CVE-2022-49674 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit 332bd0778775d0cf105c4b9e03e460b590749916 upstream. On dm-raid table load (using raid_ctr), dm-raid allocates an array rs->devs[rs->raid_disks] for the raid device members. rs->raid_disks is defined by the number of raid metadata and image tupples passed into the target's constructor. In the case of RAID layout changes being requested, that number can be different from the current number of members for existing raid sets as defined in their superblocks. Example RAID layout changes include: - raid1 legs being added/removed - raid4/5/6/10 number of stripes changed (stripe reshaping) - takeover to higher raid level (e.g. raid5 -> raid6) When accessing array members, rs->raid_disks must be used in control loops instead of the potentially larger value in rs->md.raid_disks. Otherwise it will cause memory access beyond the end of the rs->devs array. Fix this by changing code that is prone to out-of-bounds access. Also fix validate_raid_redundancy() to validate all devices that are added. Also, use braces to help clean up raid_iterate_devices(). The out-of-bounds memory accesses was discovered using KASAN. This commit was verified to pass all LVM2 RAID tests (with KASAN enabled). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Yuan Can <yuancan@huawei.com> --- drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c index cb34dbf8bf31..9a5d65d2223b 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c @@ -998,12 +998,13 @@ static int validate_region_size(struct raid_set *rs, unsigned long region_size) static int validate_raid_redundancy(struct raid_set *rs) { unsigned int i, rebuild_cnt = 0; - unsigned int rebuilds_per_group = 0, copies; + unsigned int rebuilds_per_group = 0, copies, raid_disks; unsigned int group_size, last_group_start; - for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++) - if (!test_bit(In_sync, &rs->dev[i].rdev.flags) || - !rs->dev[i].rdev.sb_page) + for (i = 0; i < rs->raid_disks; i++) + if (!test_bit(FirstUse, &rs->dev[i].rdev.flags) && + ((!test_bit(In_sync, &rs->dev[i].rdev.flags) || + !rs->dev[i].rdev.sb_page))) rebuild_cnt++; switch (rs->md.level) { @@ -1043,8 +1044,9 @@ static int validate_raid_redundancy(struct raid_set *rs) * A A B B C * C D D E E */ + raid_disks = min(rs->raid_disks, rs->md.raid_disks); if (__is_raid10_near(rs->md.new_layout)) { - for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < raid_disks; i++) { if (!(i % copies)) rebuilds_per_group = 0; if ((!rs->dev[i].rdev.sb_page || @@ -1067,10 +1069,10 @@ static int validate_raid_redundancy(struct raid_set *rs) * results in the need to treat the last (potentially larger) * set differently. */ - group_size = (rs->md.raid_disks / copies); - last_group_start = (rs->md.raid_disks / group_size) - 1; + group_size = (raid_disks / copies); + last_group_start = (raid_disks / group_size) - 1; last_group_start *= group_size; - for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < raid_disks; i++) { if (!(i % copies) && !(i > last_group_start)) rebuilds_per_group = 0; if ((!rs->dev[i].rdev.sb_page || @@ -1585,7 +1587,7 @@ static sector_t __rdev_sectors(struct raid_set *rs) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < rs->raid_disks; i++) { struct md_rdev *rdev = &rs->dev[i].rdev; if (!test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) && @@ -3748,13 +3750,13 @@ static int raid_iterate_devices(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int i; int r = 0; - for (i = 0; !r && i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++) - if (rs->dev[i].data_dev) - r = fn(ti, - rs->dev[i].data_dev, - 0, /* No offset on data devs */ - rs->md.dev_sectors, - data); + for (i = 0; !r && i < rs->raid_disks; i++) { + if (rs->dev[i].data_dev) { + r = fn(ti, rs->dev[i].data_dev, + 0, /* No offset on data devs */ + rs->md.dev_sectors, data); + } + } return r; } -- 2.22.0