[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/4] Fix 4 CVEs in JFFS2
CVE-2022-49381 CVE-2022-49277 CVE-2022-49276 CVE-2021-47656 Baokun Li (4): jffs2: fix use-after-free in jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem jffs2: fix memory leak in jffs2_scan_medium jffs2: fix memory leak in jffs2_do_mount_fs jffs2: fix memory leak in jffs2_do_fill_super fs/jffs2/build.c | 4 +++- fs/jffs2/fs.c | 3 ++- fs/jffs2/scan.c | 6 ++++-- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.34.3
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.238 commit c3b07c875fa8f906f932976460fd14798596f101 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBP4D9 CVE: CVE-2021-47656 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit 4c7c44ee1650677fbe89d86edbad9497b7679b5c upstream. When we mount a jffs2 image, assume that the first few blocks of the image are normal and contain at least one xattr-related inode, but the next block is abnormal. As a result, an error is returned in jffs2_scan_eraseblock(). jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem() is then called in jffs2_build_filesystem() and then again in jffs2_do_fill_super(). Finally we can observe the following report: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem+0x95/0x6ac Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881243384e0 by task mount/719 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x115/0x16b jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem+0x95/0x6ac jffs2_do_fill_super+0x84f/0xc30 jffs2_fill_super+0x2ea/0x4c0 mtd_get_sb+0x254/0x400 mtd_get_sb_by_nr+0x4f/0xd0 get_tree_mtd+0x498/0x840 jffs2_get_tree+0x25/0x30 vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2e0 path_mount+0x50f/0x1e50 do_mount+0x107/0x130 __se_sys_mount+0x1c5/0x2f0 __x64_sys_mount+0xc7/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x45/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Allocated by task 719: kasan_save_stack+0x23/0x60 __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0x10b/0x120 kasan_slab_alloc+0x12/0x20 kmem_cache_alloc+0x1c0/0x870 jffs2_alloc_xattr_ref+0x2f/0xa0 jffs2_scan_medium.cold+0x3713/0x4794 jffs2_do_mount_fs.cold+0xa7/0x2253 jffs2_do_fill_super+0x383/0xc30 jffs2_fill_super+0x2ea/0x4c0 [...] Freed by task 719: kmem_cache_free+0xcc/0x7b0 jffs2_free_xattr_ref+0x78/0x98 jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem+0xa1/0x6ac jffs2_do_mount_fs.cold+0x5e6/0x2253 jffs2_do_fill_super+0x383/0xc30 jffs2_fill_super+0x2ea/0x4c0 [...] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881243384b8 which belongs to the cache jffs2_xattr_ref of size 48 The buggy address is located 40 bytes inside of 48-byte region [ffff8881243384b8, ffff8881243384e8) [...] ================================================================== The triggering of the BUG is shown in the following stack: ----------------------------------------------------------- jffs2_fill_super jffs2_do_fill_super jffs2_do_mount_fs jffs2_build_filesystem jffs2_scan_medium jffs2_scan_eraseblock <--- ERROR jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem <--- free jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem <--- free again ----------------------------------------------------------- An error is returned in jffs2_do_mount_fs(). If the error is returned by jffs2_sum_init(), the jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem() does not need to be executed. If the error is returned by jffs2_build_filesystem(), the jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem() also does not need to be executed again. So move jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem() from 'out_inohash' to 'out_root' to fix this UAF problem. Fixes: aa98d7cf59b5 ("[JFFS2][XATTR] XATTR support on JFFS2 (version. 5)") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhaolong <wangzhaolong1@huawei.com> --- fs/jffs2/fs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/jffs2/fs.c b/fs/jffs2/fs.c index eab04eca95a3..81f7a6efe168 100644 --- a/fs/jffs2/fs.c +++ b/fs/jffs2/fs.c @@ -595,12 +595,12 @@ int jffs2_do_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) out_root: jffs2_free_ino_caches(c); jffs2_free_raw_node_refs(c); kvfree(c->blocks); - out_inohash: jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem(c); + out_inohash: kfree(c->inocache_list); out_wbuf: jffs2_flash_cleanup(c); return ret; -- 2.34.3
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.238 commit e711913463af916d777a4873068f415f1fe2ad33 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBP66Z CVE: CVE-2022-49276 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit 9cdd3128874f5fe759e2c4e1360ab7fb96a8d1df upstream. If an error is returned in jffs2_scan_eraseblock() and some memory has been added to the jffs2_summary *s, we can observe the following kmemleak report: -------------------------------------------- unreferenced object 0xffff88812b889c40 (size 64): comm "mount", pid 692, jiffies 4294838325 (age 34.288s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 40 48 b5 14 81 88 ff ff 01 e0 31 00 00 00 50 00 @H........1...P. 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 09 08 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffffae93a3a3>] __kmalloc+0x613/0x910 [<ffffffffaf423b9c>] jffs2_sum_add_dirent_mem+0x5c/0xa0 [<ffffffffb0f3afa8>] jffs2_scan_medium.cold+0x36e5/0x4794 [<ffffffffb0f3dbe1>] jffs2_do_mount_fs.cold+0xa7/0x2267 [<ffffffffaf40acf3>] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x383/0xc30 [<ffffffffaf40c00a>] jffs2_fill_super+0x2ea/0x4c0 [<ffffffffb0315d64>] mtd_get_sb+0x254/0x400 [<ffffffffb0315f5f>] mtd_get_sb_by_nr+0x4f/0xd0 [<ffffffffb0316478>] get_tree_mtd+0x498/0x840 [<ffffffffaf40bd15>] jffs2_get_tree+0x25/0x30 [<ffffffffae9f358d>] vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2e0 [<ffffffffaea7a98f>] path_mount+0x50f/0x1e50 [<ffffffffaea7c3d7>] do_mount+0x107/0x130 [<ffffffffaea7c5c5>] __se_sys_mount+0x1c5/0x2f0 [<ffffffffaea7c917>] __x64_sys_mount+0xc7/0x160 [<ffffffffb10142f5>] do_syscall_64+0x45/0x70 unreferenced object 0xffff888114b54840 (size 32): comm "mount", pid 692, jiffies 4294838325 (age 34.288s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): c0 75 b5 14 81 88 ff ff 02 e0 02 00 00 00 02 00 .u.............. 00 00 84 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b a5 ......D...kkkkk. backtrace: [<ffffffffae93be24>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x584/0x880 [<ffffffffaf423b04>] jffs2_sum_add_inode_mem+0x54/0x90 [<ffffffffb0f3bd44>] jffs2_scan_medium.cold+0x4481/0x4794 [...] unreferenced object 0xffff888114b57280 (size 32): comm "mount", pid 692, jiffies 4294838393 (age 34.357s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 10 d5 6c 11 81 88 ff ff 08 e0 05 00 00 00 01 00 ..l............. 00 00 38 02 00 00 28 00 00 00 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b a5 ..8...(...kkkkk. backtrace: [<ffffffffae93be24>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x584/0x880 [<ffffffffaf423c34>] jffs2_sum_add_xattr_mem+0x54/0x90 [<ffffffffb0f3a24f>] jffs2_scan_medium.cold+0x298c/0x4794 [...] unreferenced object 0xffff8881116cd510 (size 16): comm "mount", pid 692, jiffies 4294838395 (age 34.355s) hex dump (first 16 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 09 e0 60 02 00 00 6b a5 ..........`...k. backtrace: [<ffffffffae93be24>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x584/0x880 [<ffffffffaf423cc4>] jffs2_sum_add_xref_mem+0x54/0x90 [<ffffffffb0f3b2e3>] jffs2_scan_medium.cold+0x3a20/0x4794 [...] -------------------------------------------- Therefore, we should call jffs2_sum_reset_collected(s) on exit to release the memory added in s. In addition, a new tag "out_buf" is added to prevent the NULL pointer reference caused by s being NULL. (thanks to Zhang Yi for this analysis) Fixes: e631ddba5887 ("[JFFS2] Add erase block summary support (mount time improvement)") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Co-developed-with: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhaolong <wangzhaolong1@huawei.com> --- fs/jffs2/scan.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/jffs2/scan.c b/fs/jffs2/scan.c index 90431dd613b8..b2c1a39ebc8e 100644 --- a/fs/jffs2/scan.c +++ b/fs/jffs2/scan.c @@ -134,11 +134,11 @@ int jffs2_scan_medium(struct jffs2_sb_info *c) if (jffs2_sum_active()) { s = kzalloc(sizeof(struct jffs2_summary), GFP_KERNEL); if (!s) { JFFS2_WARNING("Can't allocate memory for summary\n"); ret = -ENOMEM; - goto out; + goto out_buf; } } for (i=0; i<c->nr_blocks; i++) { struct jffs2_eraseblock *jeb = &c->blocks[i]; @@ -272,17 +272,19 @@ int jffs2_scan_medium(struct jffs2_sb_info *c) jffs2_garbage_collect_trigger(c); spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock); } ret = 0; out: + jffs2_sum_reset_collected(s); + kfree(s); + out_buf: if (buf_size) kfree(flashbuf); #ifndef __ECOS else mtd_unpoint(c->mtd, 0, c->mtd->size); #endif - kfree(s); return ret; } static int jffs2_fill_scan_buf(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, void *buf, uint32_t ofs, uint32_t len) -- 2.34.3
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.238 commit dbe0d0521eaa6a3d235517319266c539bb5c5112 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBP6XT CVE: CVE-2022-49277 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit d051cef784de4d54835f6b6836d98a8f6935772c upstream. If jffs2_build_filesystem() in jffs2_do_mount_fs() returns an error, we can observe the following kmemleak report: -------------------------------------------- unreferenced object 0xffff88811b25a640 (size 64): comm "mount", pid 691, jiffies 4294957728 (age 71.952s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffffa493be24>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x584/0x880 [<ffffffffa5423a06>] jffs2_sum_init+0x86/0x130 [<ffffffffa5400e58>] jffs2_do_mount_fs+0x798/0xac0 [<ffffffffa540acf3>] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x383/0xc30 [<ffffffffa540c00a>] jffs2_fill_super+0x2ea/0x4c0 [...] unreferenced object 0xffff88812c760000 (size 65536): comm "mount", pid 691, jiffies 4294957728 (age 71.952s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ................ bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ................ backtrace: [<ffffffffa493a449>] __kmalloc+0x6b9/0x910 [<ffffffffa5423a57>] jffs2_sum_init+0xd7/0x130 [<ffffffffa5400e58>] jffs2_do_mount_fs+0x798/0xac0 [<ffffffffa540acf3>] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x383/0xc30 [<ffffffffa540c00a>] jffs2_fill_super+0x2ea/0x4c0 [...] -------------------------------------------- This is because the resources allocated in jffs2_sum_init() are not released. Call jffs2_sum_exit() to release these resources to solve the problem. Fixes: e631ddba5887 ("[JFFS2] Add erase block summary support (mount time improvement)") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhaolong <wangzhaolong1@huawei.com> --- fs/jffs2/build.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/jffs2/build.c b/fs/jffs2/build.c index b288c8ae1236..837cd55fd4c5 100644 --- a/fs/jffs2/build.c +++ b/fs/jffs2/build.c @@ -413,17 +413,19 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct jffs2_sb_info *c) if (jffs2_build_filesystem(c)) { dbg_fsbuild("build_fs failed\n"); jffs2_free_ino_caches(c); jffs2_free_raw_node_refs(c); ret = -EIO; - goto out_free; + goto out_sum_exit; } jffs2_calc_trigger_levels(c); return 0; + out_sum_exit: + jffs2_sum_exit(c); out_free: kvfree(c->blocks); return ret; } -- 2.34.3
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.247 commit 28048a4cf3813b7cf5cc8cce629dfdc7951cb1c2 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBP724 CVE: CVE-2022-49381 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit c14adb1cf70a984ed081c67e9d27bc3caad9537c ] If jffs2_iget() or d_make_root() in jffs2_do_fill_super() returns an error, we can observe the following kmemleak report: -------------------------------------------- unreferenced object 0xffff888105a65340 (size 64): comm "mount", pid 710, jiffies 4302851558 (age 58.239s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff859c45e5>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x475/0x8a0 [<ffffffff86160146>] jffs2_sum_init+0x96/0x1a0 [<ffffffff86140e25>] jffs2_do_mount_fs+0x745/0x2120 [<ffffffff86149fec>] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x35c/0x810 [<ffffffff8614aae9>] jffs2_fill_super+0x2b9/0x3b0 [...] unreferenced object 0xffff8881bd7f0000 (size 65536): comm "mount", pid 710, jiffies 4302851558 (age 58.239s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ................ bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff858579ba>] kmalloc_order+0xda/0x110 [<ffffffff85857a11>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x21/0x130 [<ffffffff859c2ed1>] __kmalloc+0x711/0x8a0 [<ffffffff86160189>] jffs2_sum_init+0xd9/0x1a0 [<ffffffff86140e25>] jffs2_do_mount_fs+0x745/0x2120 [<ffffffff86149fec>] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x35c/0x810 [<ffffffff8614aae9>] jffs2_fill_super+0x2b9/0x3b0 [...] -------------------------------------------- This is because the resources allocated in jffs2_sum_init() are not released. Call jffs2_sum_exit() to release these resources to solve the problem. Fixes: e631ddba5887 ("[JFFS2] Add erase block summary support (mount time improvement)") Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhaolong <wangzhaolong1@huawei.com> --- fs/jffs2/fs.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/jffs2/fs.c b/fs/jffs2/fs.c index 81f7a6efe168..6afaace72f2b 100644 --- a/fs/jffs2/fs.c +++ b/fs/jffs2/fs.c @@ -596,10 +596,11 @@ int jffs2_do_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) out_root: jffs2_free_ino_caches(c); jffs2_free_raw_node_refs(c); kvfree(c->blocks); jffs2_clear_xattr_subsystem(c); + jffs2_sum_exit(c); out_inohash: kfree(c->inocache_list); out_wbuf: jffs2_flash_cleanup(c); -- 2.34.3
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/15500 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/KBV... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/15500 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/KBV...
participants (2)
-
patchwork bot -
Wang Zhaolong