[PATCH OLK-5.10 1/4] netfilter: nf_tables: incorrect error path handling with NFT_MSG_NEWRULE
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.4-rc7 commit 1240eb93f0616b21c675416516ff3d74798fdc97 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I7H68N CVE: CVE-2023-3117 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- In case of error when adding a new rule that refers to an anonymous set, deactivate expressions via NFT_TRANS_PREPARE state, not NFT_TRANS_RELEASE. Thus, the lookup expression marks anonymous sets as inactive in the next generation to ensure it is not reachable in this transaction anymore and decrement the set refcount as introduced by c1592a89942e ("netfilter: nf_tables: deactivate anonymous set from preparation phase"). The abort step takes care of undoing the anonymous set. This is also consistent with rule deletion, where NFT_TRANS_PREPARE is used. Note that this error path is exercised in the preparation step of the commit protocol. This patch replaces nf_tables_rule_release() by the deactivate and destroy calls, this time with NFT_TRANS_PREPARE. Due to this incorrect error handling, it is possible to access a dangling pointer to the anonymous set that remains in the transaction list. [1009.379054] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in nft_set_lookup_global+0x147/0x1a0 [nf_tables] [1009.379106] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88816c4c8020 by task nft-rule-add/137110 [1009.379116] CPU: 7 PID: 137110 Comm: nft-rule-add Not tainted 6.4.0-rc4+ #256 [1009.379128] Call Trace: [1009.379132] <TASK> [1009.379135] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50 [1009.379146] ? nft_set_lookup_global+0x147/0x1a0 [nf_tables] [1009.379191] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x27/0x300 [1009.379201] kasan_report+0x107/0x120 [1009.379210] ? nft_set_lookup_global+0x147/0x1a0 [nf_tables] [1009.379255] nft_set_lookup_global+0x147/0x1a0 [nf_tables] [1009.379302] nft_lookup_init+0xa5/0x270 [nf_tables] [1009.379350] nf_tables_newrule+0x698/0xe50 [nf_tables] [1009.379397] ? nf_tables_rule_release+0xe0/0xe0 [nf_tables] [1009.379441] ? kasan_unpoison+0x23/0x50 [1009.379450] nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0x97c/0xd90 [nfnetlink] [1009.379470] ? nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x480/0x480 [nfnetlink] [1009.379485] ? __alloc_skb+0xb8/0x1e0 [1009.379493] ? __alloc_skb+0xb8/0x1e0 [1009.379502] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [1009.379509] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x2a/0x40 [1009.379517] ? write_profile+0xc0/0xc0 [1009.379524] ? avc_lookup+0x8f/0xc0 [1009.379532] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x43/0x60 Fixes: 958bee14d071 ("netfilter: nf_tables: use new transaction infrastructure to handle sets") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> conflict: net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11@huawei.com> --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index 62049daf1351..f3c4e75dc0aa 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -3366,7 +3366,8 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, return 0; err2: - nf_tables_rule_release(&ctx, rule); + nft_rule_expr_deactivate(&ctx, rule, NFT_TRANS_PREPARE); + nf_tables_rule_destroy(&ctx, rule); err1: for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (info[i].ops) { -- 2.25.1
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.4 commit 4bedf9eee016286c835e3d8fa981ddece5338795 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I7H68N CVE: CVE-2023-3117 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- Add bound flag to rule and chain transactions as in 6a0a8d10a366 ("netfilter: nf_tables: use-after-free in failing rule with bound set") to skip them in case that the chain is already bound from the abort path. This patch fixes an imbalance in the chain use refcnt that triggers a WARN_ON on the table and chain destroy path. This patch also disallows nested chain bindings, which is not supported from userspace. The logic to deal with chain binding in nft_data_hold() and nft_data_release() is not correct. The NFT_TRANS_PREPARE state needs a special handling in case a chain is bound but next expressions in the same rule fail to initialize as described by 1240eb93f061 ("netfilter: nf_tables: incorrect error path handling with NFT_MSG_NEWRULE"). The chain is left bound if rule construction fails, so the objects stored in this chain (and the chain itself) are released by the transaction records from the abort path, follow up patch ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR to deal with bound set/chain") completes this error handling. When deleting an existing rule, chain bound flag is set off so the rule expression .destroy path releases the objects. Fixes: d0e2c7de92c7 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_CHAIN_BINDING") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> conflict: include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11@huawei.com> --- include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 21 +++++++- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++----------- net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h index f0870b382678..1a69a2201654 100644 --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h @@ -908,7 +908,10 @@ static inline struct nft_userdata *nft_userdata(const struct nft_rule *rule) return (void *)&rule->data[rule->dlen]; } -void nf_tables_rule_release(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule); +void nft_rule_expr_activate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule); +void nft_rule_expr_deactivate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule, + enum nft_trans_phase phase); +void nf_tables_rule_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule); static inline void nft_set_elem_update_expr(const struct nft_set_ext *ext, struct nft_regs *regs, @@ -967,6 +970,7 @@ struct nft_chain { }; int nft_chain_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_chain *chain); +int nf_tables_bind_chain(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain); enum nft_chain_types { NFT_CHAIN_T_DEFAULT = 0, @@ -1003,11 +1007,17 @@ int nft_chain_validate_dependency(const struct nft_chain *chain, int nft_chain_validate_hooks(const struct nft_chain *chain, unsigned int hook_flags); +static inline bool nft_chain_binding(const struct nft_chain *chain) +{ + return chain->flags & NFT_CHAIN_BINDING; +} + static inline bool nft_chain_is_bound(struct nft_chain *chain) { return (chain->flags & NFT_CHAIN_BINDING) && chain->bound; } +int nft_chain_add(struct nft_table *table, struct nft_chain *chain); void nft_chain_del(struct nft_chain *chain); void nf_tables_chain_destroy(struct nft_ctx *ctx); @@ -1432,6 +1442,7 @@ struct nft_trans_rule { struct nft_rule *rule; struct nft_flow_rule *flow; u32 rule_id; + bool bound; }; #define nft_trans_rule(trans) \ @@ -1440,6 +1451,8 @@ struct nft_trans_rule { (((struct nft_trans_rule *)trans->data)->flow) #define nft_trans_rule_id(trans) \ (((struct nft_trans_rule *)trans->data)->rule_id) +#define nft_trans_rule_bound(trans) \ + (((struct nft_trans_rule *)trans->data)->bound) struct nft_trans_set { struct nft_set *set; @@ -1455,13 +1468,17 @@ struct nft_trans_set { (((struct nft_trans_set *)trans->data)->bound) struct nft_trans_chain { + struct nft_chain *chain; bool update; char *name; struct nft_stats __percpu *stats; u8 policy; + bool bound; u32 chain_id; }; +#define nft_trans_chain(trans) \ + (((struct nft_trans_chain *)trans->data)->chain) #define nft_trans_chain_update(trans) \ (((struct nft_trans_chain *)trans->data)->update) #define nft_trans_chain_name(trans) \ @@ -1470,6 +1487,8 @@ struct nft_trans_chain { (((struct nft_trans_chain *)trans->data)->stats) #define nft_trans_chain_policy(trans) \ (((struct nft_trans_chain *)trans->data)->policy) +#define nft_trans_chain_bound(trans) \ + (((struct nft_trans_chain *)trans->data)->bound) #define nft_trans_chain_id(trans) \ (((struct nft_trans_chain *)trans->data)->chain_id) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index f3c4e75dc0aa..47ffd41773cb 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -190,6 +190,46 @@ static void nft_set_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set) } } +static void nft_chain_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain) +{ + struct net *net = ctx->net; + struct nft_trans *trans; + + if (!nft_chain_binding(chain)) + return; + + list_for_each_entry_reverse(trans, &net->nft.commit_list, list) { + switch (trans->msg_type) { + case NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN: + if (nft_trans_chain(trans) == chain) + nft_trans_chain_bound(trans) = true; + break; + case NFT_MSG_NEWRULE: + if (trans->ctx.chain == chain) + nft_trans_rule_bound(trans) = true; + break; + } + } +} + +int nf_tables_bind_chain(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain) +{ + if (!nft_chain_binding(chain)) + return 0; + + if (nft_chain_binding(ctx->chain)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + if (chain->bound) + return -EBUSY; + + chain->bound = true; + chain->use++; + nft_chain_trans_bind(ctx, chain); + + return 0; +} + static int nft_netdev_register_hooks(struct net *net, struct list_head *hook_list) { @@ -313,8 +353,9 @@ static struct nft_trans *nft_trans_chain_add(struct nft_ctx *ctx, int msg_type) ntohl(nla_get_be32(ctx->nla[NFTA_CHAIN_ID])); } } - + nft_trans_chain(trans) = ctx->chain; list_add_tail(&trans->list, &ctx->net->nft.commit_list); + return trans; } @@ -332,8 +373,7 @@ static int nft_delchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx) return 0; } -static void nft_rule_expr_activate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, - struct nft_rule *rule) +void nft_rule_expr_activate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule) { struct nft_expr *expr; @@ -346,9 +386,8 @@ static void nft_rule_expr_activate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, } } -static void nft_rule_expr_deactivate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, - struct nft_rule *rule, - enum nft_trans_phase phase) +void nft_rule_expr_deactivate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule, + enum nft_trans_phase phase) { struct nft_expr *expr; @@ -1981,7 +2020,7 @@ static int nft_basechain_init(struct nft_base_chain *basechain, u8 family, return 0; } -static int nft_chain_add(struct nft_table *table, struct nft_chain *chain) +int nft_chain_add(struct nft_table *table, struct nft_chain *chain) { int err; @@ -3077,8 +3116,7 @@ static int nf_tables_getrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, return err; } -static void nf_tables_rule_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, - struct nft_rule *rule) +void nf_tables_rule_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule) { struct nft_expr *expr, *next; @@ -3095,7 +3133,7 @@ static void nf_tables_rule_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, kfree(rule); } -void nf_tables_rule_release(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule) +static void nf_tables_rule_release(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *rule) { nft_rule_expr_deactivate(ctx, rule, NFT_TRANS_RELEASE); nf_tables_rule_destroy(ctx, rule); @@ -5492,7 +5530,6 @@ static int nf_tables_newsetelem(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, void nft_data_hold(const struct nft_data *data, enum nft_data_types type) { struct nft_chain *chain; - struct nft_rule *rule; if (type == NFT_DATA_VERDICT) { switch (data->verdict.code) { @@ -5500,15 +5537,6 @@ void nft_data_hold(const struct nft_data *data, enum nft_data_types type) case NFT_GOTO: chain = data->verdict.chain; chain->use++; - - if (!nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) - break; - - chain->table->use++; - list_for_each_entry(rule, &chain->rules, list) - chain->use++; - - nft_chain_add(chain->table, chain); break; } } @@ -8174,7 +8202,7 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action) kfree(nft_trans_chain_name(trans)); nft_trans_destroy(trans); } else { - if (nft_chain_is_bound(trans->ctx.chain)) { + if (nft_trans_chain_bound(trans)) { nft_trans_destroy(trans); break; } @@ -8191,6 +8219,10 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action) nft_trans_destroy(trans); break; case NFT_MSG_NEWRULE: + if (nft_trans_rule_bound(trans)) { + nft_trans_destroy(trans); + break; + } trans->ctx.chain->use--; list_del_rcu(&nft_trans_rule(trans)->list); nft_rule_expr_deactivate(&trans->ctx, @@ -8727,22 +8759,12 @@ static int nft_verdict_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_data *data, static void nft_verdict_uninit(const struct nft_data *data) { struct nft_chain *chain; - struct nft_rule *rule; switch (data->verdict.code) { case NFT_JUMP: case NFT_GOTO: chain = data->verdict.chain; chain->use--; - - if (!nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) - break; - - chain->table->use--; - list_for_each_entry(rule, &chain->rules, list) - chain->use--; - - nft_chain_del(chain); break; } } diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c b/net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c index fcdbc5ed3f36..9d4248898ce4 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c @@ -76,11 +76,9 @@ static int nft_immediate_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, switch (priv->data.verdict.code) { case NFT_JUMP: case NFT_GOTO: - if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) { - err = -EBUSY; - goto err1; - } - chain->bound = true; + err = nf_tables_bind_chain(ctx, chain); + if (err < 0) + return err; break; default: break; @@ -98,6 +96,31 @@ static void nft_immediate_activate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr) { const struct nft_immediate_expr *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr); + const struct nft_data *data = &priv->data; + struct nft_ctx chain_ctx; + struct nft_chain *chain; + struct nft_rule *rule; + + if (priv->dreg == NFT_REG_VERDICT) { + switch (data->verdict.code) { + case NFT_JUMP: + case NFT_GOTO: + chain = data->verdict.chain; + if (!nft_chain_binding(chain)) + break; + + chain_ctx = *ctx; + chain_ctx.chain = chain; + + list_for_each_entry(rule, &chain->rules, list) + nft_rule_expr_activate(&chain_ctx, rule); + + nft_clear(ctx->net, chain); + break; + default: + break; + } + } return nft_data_hold(&priv->data, nft_dreg_to_type(priv->dreg)); } @@ -107,6 +130,40 @@ static void nft_immediate_deactivate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, enum nft_trans_phase phase) { const struct nft_immediate_expr *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr); + const struct nft_data *data = &priv->data; + struct nft_ctx chain_ctx; + struct nft_chain *chain; + struct nft_rule *rule; + + if (priv->dreg == NFT_REG_VERDICT) { + switch (data->verdict.code) { + case NFT_JUMP: + case NFT_GOTO: + chain = data->verdict.chain; + if (!nft_chain_binding(chain)) + break; + + chain_ctx = *ctx; + chain_ctx.chain = chain; + + list_for_each_entry(rule, &chain->rules, list) + nft_rule_expr_deactivate(&chain_ctx, rule, phase); + + switch (phase) { + case NFT_TRANS_PREPARE: + nft_deactivate_next(ctx->net, chain); + break; + default: + nft_chain_del(chain); + chain->bound = false; + chain->table->use--; + break; + } + break; + default: + break; + } + } if (phase == NFT_TRANS_COMMIT) return; @@ -131,15 +188,27 @@ static void nft_immediate_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, case NFT_GOTO: chain = data->verdict.chain; - if (!nft_chain_is_bound(chain)) + if (!nft_chain_binding(chain)) + break; + + /* Rule construction failed, but chain is already bound: + * let the transaction records release this chain and its rules. + */ + if (chain->bound) { + chain->use--; break; + } + /* Rule has been deleted, release chain and its rules. */ chain_ctx = *ctx; chain_ctx.chain = chain; - list_for_each_entry_safe(rule, n, &chain->rules, list) - nf_tables_rule_release(&chain_ctx, rule); - + chain->use--; + list_for_each_entry_safe(rule, n, &chain->rules, list) { + chain->use--; + list_del(&rule->list); + nf_tables_rule_destroy(&chain_ctx, rule); + } nf_tables_chain_destroy(&chain_ctx); break; default: -- 2.25.1
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.4 commit 26b5a5712eb85e253724e56a54c17f8519bd8e4e category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I7H68N CVE: CVE-2023-3117 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- Add a new state to deal with rule expressions deactivation from the newrule error path, otherwise the anonymous set remains in the list in inactive state for the next generation. Mark the set/chain transaction as unbound so the abort path releases this object, set it as inactive in the next generation so it is not reachable anymore from this transaction and reference counter is dropped. Fixes: 1240eb93f061 ("netfilter: nf_tables: incorrect error path handling with NFT_MSG_NEWRULE") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> conflict: include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11@huawei.com> --- include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 ++ net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h index 1a69a2201654..5756d78f5e17 100644 --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h @@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ struct nft_expr_type { enum nft_trans_phase { NFT_TRANS_PREPARE, + NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR, NFT_TRANS_ABORT, NFT_TRANS_COMMIT, NFT_TRANS_RELEASE @@ -971,6 +972,7 @@ struct nft_chain { int nft_chain_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_chain *chain); int nf_tables_bind_chain(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain); +void nf_tables_unbind_chain(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain); enum nft_chain_types { NFT_CHAIN_T_DEFAULT = 0, diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index 47ffd41773cb..cf5df4eb7b41 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ static void nft_trans_destroy(struct nft_trans *trans) kfree(trans); } -static void nft_set_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set) +static void __nft_set_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set, + bool bind) { struct net *net = ctx->net; struct nft_trans *trans; @@ -180,17 +181,28 @@ static void nft_set_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set) switch (trans->msg_type) { case NFT_MSG_NEWSET: if (nft_trans_set(trans) == set) - nft_trans_set_bound(trans) = true; + nft_trans_set_bound(trans) = bind; break; case NFT_MSG_NEWSETELEM: if (nft_trans_elem_set(trans) == set) - nft_trans_elem_set_bound(trans) = true; + nft_trans_elem_set_bound(trans) = bind; break; } } } -static void nft_chain_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain) +static void nft_set_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set) +{ + return __nft_set_trans_bind(ctx, set, true); +} + +static void nft_set_trans_unbind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set) +{ + return __nft_set_trans_bind(ctx, set, false); +} + +static void __nft_chain_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, + struct nft_chain *chain, bool bind) { struct net *net = ctx->net; struct nft_trans *trans; @@ -202,16 +214,22 @@ static void nft_chain_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *ch switch (trans->msg_type) { case NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN: if (nft_trans_chain(trans) == chain) - nft_trans_chain_bound(trans) = true; + nft_trans_chain_bound(trans) = bind; break; case NFT_MSG_NEWRULE: if (trans->ctx.chain == chain) - nft_trans_rule_bound(trans) = true; + nft_trans_rule_bound(trans) = bind; break; } } } +static void nft_chain_trans_bind(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, + struct nft_chain *chain) +{ + __nft_chain_trans_bind(ctx, chain, true); +} + int nf_tables_bind_chain(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain) { if (!nft_chain_binding(chain)) @@ -230,6 +248,11 @@ int nf_tables_bind_chain(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain) return 0; } +void nf_tables_unbind_chain(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_chain *chain) +{ + __nft_chain_trans_bind(ctx, chain, false); +} + static int nft_netdev_register_hooks(struct net *net, struct list_head *hook_list) { @@ -3404,7 +3427,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk, return 0; err2: - nft_rule_expr_deactivate(&ctx, rule, NFT_TRANS_PREPARE); + nft_rule_expr_deactivate(&ctx, rule, NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR); nf_tables_rule_destroy(&ctx, rule); err1: for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { @@ -4534,6 +4557,13 @@ void nf_tables_deactivate_set(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set, enum nft_trans_phase phase) { switch (phase) { + case NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR: + nft_set_trans_unbind(ctx, set); + if (nft_set_is_anonymous(set)) + nft_deactivate_next(ctx->net, set); + + set->use--; + break; case NFT_TRANS_PREPARE: if (nft_set_is_anonymous(set)) nft_deactivate_next(ctx->net, set); @@ -6460,6 +6490,7 @@ void nf_tables_deactivate_flowtable(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, enum nft_trans_phase phase) { switch (phase) { + case NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR: case NFT_TRANS_PREPARE: case NFT_TRANS_ABORT: case NFT_TRANS_RELEASE: diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c b/net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c index 9d4248898ce4..6b0efab4fad0 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c @@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ static void nft_immediate_deactivate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, nft_rule_expr_deactivate(&chain_ctx, rule, phase); switch (phase) { + case NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR: + nf_tables_unbind_chain(ctx, chain); + fallthrough; case NFT_TRANS_PREPARE: nft_deactivate_next(ctx->net, chain); break; -- 2.25.1
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.4 commit 3e70489721b6c870252c9082c496703677240f53 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I7H68N CVE: CVE-2023-3117 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- Otherwise a dangling reference to a rule object that is gone remains in the set binding list. Fixes: 26b5a5712eb8 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_TRANS_PREPARE_ERROR to deal with bound set/chain") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11@huawei.com> --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index cf5df4eb7b41..cf2ada607b3d 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -4561,6 +4561,8 @@ void nf_tables_deactivate_set(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set, nft_set_trans_unbind(ctx, set); if (nft_set_is_anonymous(set)) nft_deactivate_next(ctx->net, set); + else + list_del_rcu(&binding->list); set->use--; break; -- 2.25.1
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，转换为PR失败！ 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/K... 失败原因：补丁集缺失封面信息 建议解决方法：请提供补丁集并重新发送您的补丁集到邮件列表 FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org has been converted to PR failed! Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/K... Failed Reason: the cover of the patches is missing Suggest Solution: please checkout and apply the patches' cover and send all again
participants (2)
-
Jialin Zhang -
patchwork bot