From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.41 commit 5f5d0799eb0a01d550c21b7894e26b2d9db55763 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAF3IR CVE: CVE-2024-41012 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=t... -------------------------------- commit 3cad1bc010416c6dd780643476bc59ed742436b9 upstream. When fcntl_setlk() races with close(), it removes the created lock with do_lock_file_wait(). However, LSMs can allow the first do_lock_file_wait() that created the lock while denying the second do_lock_file_wait() that tries to remove the lock. In theory (but AFAIK not in practice), posix_lock_file() could also fail to remove a lock due to GFP_KERNEL allocation failure (when splitting a range in the middle). After the bug has been triggered, use-after-free reads will occur in lock_get_status() when userspace reads /proc/locks. This can likely be used to read arbitrary kernel memory, but can't corrupt kernel memory. This only affects systems with SELinux / Smack / AppArmor / BPF-LSM in enforcing mode and only works from some security contexts. Fix it by calling locks_remove_posix() instead, which is designed to reliably get rid of POSIX locks associated with the given file and files_struct and is also used by filp_flush(). Fixes: c293621bbf67 ("[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling") Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=2563 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240702-fs-lock-recover-2-v1-1-edd456f63789@googl... Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> [stable fixup: ->c.flc_type was ->fl_type in older kernels] Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com> --- fs/locks.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 76ad05f8070a..a7df032d0437 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -2381,8 +2381,9 @@ int fcntl_setlk(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, error = do_lock_file_wait(filp, cmd, file_lock); /* - * Attempt to detect a close/fcntl race and recover by releasing the - * lock that was just acquired. There is no need to do that when we're + * Detect close/fcntl races and recover by zapping all POSIX locks + * associated with this file and our files_struct, just like on + * filp_flush(). There is no need to do that when we're * unlocking though, or for OFD locks. */ if (!error && file_lock->fl_type != F_UNLCK && @@ -2397,9 +2398,7 @@ int fcntl_setlk(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, f = files_lookup_fd_locked(files, fd); spin_unlock(&files->file_lock); if (f != filp) { - file_lock->fl_type = F_UNLCK; - error = do_lock_file_wait(filp, cmd, file_lock); - WARN_ON_ONCE(error); + locks_remove_posix(filp, files); error = -EBADF; } } -- 2.39.2