[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/2] xdp: Fix CVE-2026-23343
Fix CVE-2026-23343 Larysa Zaremba (2): xdp: use modulo operation to calculate XDP frag tailroom xdp: produce a warning when calculated tailroom is negative net/core/filter.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1
From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.130 commit 8701504563fa094d31453d50dc501ddf57fa25db category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/13938 CVE: CVE-2026-23343 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 88b6b7f7b216108a09887b074395fa7b751880b1 ] The current formula for calculating XDP tailroom in mbuf packets works only if each frag has its own page (if rxq->frag_size is PAGE_SIZE), this defeats the purpose of the parameter overall and without any indication leads to negative calculated tailroom on at least half of frags, if shared pages are used. There are not many drivers that set rxq->frag_size. Among them: * i40e and enetc always split page uniformly between frags, use shared pages * ice uses page_pool frags via libeth, those are power-of-2 and uniformly distributed across page * idpf has variable frag_size with XDP on, so current API is not applicable * mlx5, mtk and mvneta use PAGE_SIZE or 0 as frag_size for page_pool As for AF_XDP ZC, only ice, i40e and idpf declare frag_size for it. Modulo operation yields good results for aligned chunks, they are all power-of-2, between 2K and PAGE_SIZE. Formula without modulo fails when chunk_size is 2K. Buffers in unaligned mode are not distributed uniformly, so modulo operation would not work. To accommodate unaligned buffers, we could define frag_size as data + tailroom, and hence do not subtract offset when calculating tailroom, but this would necessitate more changes in the drivers. Define rxq->frag_size as an even portion of a page that fully belongs to a single frag. When calculating tailroom, locate the data start within such portion by performing a modulo operation on page offset. Fixes: bf25146a5595 ("bpf: add frags support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API") Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260305111253.2317394-2-larysa.zaremba@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2@huawei.com> --- net/core/filter.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index f91de361383a..4c5dd7b53919 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -4139,7 +4139,8 @@ static int bpf_xdp_frags_increase_tail(struct xdp_buff *xdp, int offset) if (!rxq->frag_size || rxq->frag_size > xdp->frame_sz) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - tailroom = rxq->frag_size - skb_frag_size(frag) - skb_frag_off(frag); + tailroom = rxq->frag_size - skb_frag_size(frag) - + skb_frag_off(frag) % rxq->frag_size; if (unlikely(offset > tailroom)) return -EINVAL; -- 2.25.1
From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.130 commit a0fb59f527d03c60b2cd547cfae4a842ad84670f category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/13938 CVE: CVE-2026-23343 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 8821e857759be9db3cde337ad328b71fe5c8a55f ] Many ethernet drivers report xdp Rx queue frag size as being the same as DMA write size. However, the only user of this field, namely bpf_xdp_frags_increase_tail(), clearly expects a truesize. Such difference leads to unspecific memory corruption issues under certain circumstances, e.g. in ixgbevf maximum DMA write size is 3 KB, so when running xskxceiver's XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_GROW_MULTI_BUFF, 6K packet fully uses all DMA-writable space in 2 buffers. This would be fine, if only rxq->frag_size was properly set to 4K, but value of 3K results in a negative tailroom, because there is a non-zero page offset. We are supposed to return -EINVAL and be done with it in such case, but due to tailroom being stored as an unsigned int, it is reported to be somewhere near UINT_MAX, resulting in a tail being grown, even if the requested offset is too much (it is around 2K in the abovementioned test). This later leads to all kinds of unspecific calltraces. [ 7340.337579] xskxceiver[1440]: segfault at 1da718 ip 00007f4161aeac9d sp 00007f41615a6a00 error 6 [ 7340.338040] xskxceiver[1441]: segfault at 7f410000000b ip 00000000004042b5 sp 00007f415bffecf0 error 4 [ 7340.338179] in libc.so.6[61c9d,7f4161aaf000+160000] [ 7340.339230] in xskxceiver[42b5,400000+69000] [ 7340.340300] likely on CPU 6 (core 0, socket 6) [ 7340.340302] Code: ff ff 01 e9 f4 fe ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 4c 39 f0 74 73 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 f0 0f b1 17 0f 85 ba 00 00 00 49 8b 87 88 00 00 00 <4c> 89 70 08 eb cc 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8d bd f0 fe ff ff 89 85 ec fe [ 7340.340888] likely on CPU 3 (core 0, socket 3) [ 7340.345088] Code: 00 00 00 ba 00 00 00 00 be 00 00 00 00 89 c7 e8 31 ca ff ff 89 45 ec 8b 45 ec 85 c0 78 07 b8 00 00 00 00 eb 46 e8 0b c8 ff ff <8b> 00 83 f8 69 74 24 e8 ff c7 ff ff 8b 00 83 f8 0b 74 18 e8 f3 c7 [ 7340.404334] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6d255010bdffc: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 7340.405972] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1439 Comm: xskxceiver Not tainted 6.19.0-rc1+ #21 PREEMPT(lazy) [ 7340.408006] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.17.0-5.fc42 04/01/2014 [ 7340.409716] RIP: 0010:lookup_swap_cgroup_id+0x44/0x80 [ 7340.410455] Code: 83 f8 1c 73 39 48 ba ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 03 48 8b 04 c5 20 55 fa bd 48 21 d1 48 89 ca 83 e1 01 48 d1 ea c1 e1 04 48 8d 04 90 <8b> 00 48 83 c4 10 d3 e8 c3 cc cc cc cc 31 c0 e9 98 b7 dd 00 48 89 [ 7340.412787] RSP: 0018:ffffcc5c04f7f6d0 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 7340.413494] RAX: 0006d255010bdffc RBX: ffff891f477895a8 RCX: 0000000000000010 [ 7340.414431] RDX: 0001c17e3fffffff RSI: 00fa070000000000 RDI: 000382fc7fffffff [ 7340.415354] RBP: 00fa070000000000 R08: ffffcc5c04f7f8f8 R09: ffffcc5c04f7f7d0 [ 7340.416283] R10: ffff891f4c1a7000 R11: ffffcc5c04f7f9c8 R12: ffffcc5c04f7f7d0 [ 7340.417218] R13: 03ffffffffffffff R14: 00fa06fffffffe00 R15: ffff891f47789500 [ 7340.418229] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff891ffdfaa000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 7340.419489] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 7340.420286] CR2: 00007f415bfffd58 CR3: 0000000103f03002 CR4: 0000000000772ef0 [ 7340.421237] PKRU: 55555554 [ 7340.421623] Call Trace: [ 7340.421987] <TASK> [ 7340.422309] ? softleaf_from_pte+0x77/0xa0 [ 7340.422855] swap_pte_batch+0xa7/0x290 [ 7340.423363] zap_nonpresent_ptes.constprop.0.isra.0+0xd1/0x270 [ 7340.424102] zap_pte_range+0x281/0x580 [ 7340.424607] zap_pmd_range.isra.0+0xc9/0x240 [ 7340.425177] unmap_page_range+0x24d/0x420 [ 7340.425714] unmap_vmas+0xa1/0x180 [ 7340.426185] exit_mmap+0xe1/0x3b0 [ 7340.426644] __mmput+0x41/0x150 [ 7340.427098] exit_mm+0xb1/0x110 [ 7340.427539] do_exit+0x1b2/0x460 [ 7340.427992] do_group_exit+0x2d/0xc0 [ 7340.428477] get_signal+0x79d/0x7e0 [ 7340.428957] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x34/0x100 [ 7340.429571] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8e/0x4c0 [ 7340.430159] do_syscall_64+0x188/0x6b0 [ 7340.430672] ? __do_sys_clone3+0xd9/0x120 [ 7340.431212] ? switch_fpu_return+0x4e/0xd0 [ 7340.431761] ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare.isra.0+0xa1/0xc0 [ 7340.432498] ? do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x6b0 [ 7340.433015] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x445/0x690 [ 7340.433582] ? count_memcg_events+0xd6/0x210 [ 7340.434151] ? handle_mm_fault+0x212/0x340 [ 7340.434697] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2b4/0x7b0 [ 7340.435271] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 7340.435788] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 7340.436299] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 7340.436812] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 7340.437323] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 7340.437973] RIP: 0033:0x7f4161b14169 [ 7340.438468] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f4161b1413f. [ 7340.439242] RSP: 002b:00007ffc6ebfa770 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca [ 7340.440173] RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00000000000005a1 RCX: 00007f4161b14169 [ 7340.441061] RDX: 00000000000005a1 RSI: 0000000000000109 RDI: 00007f415bfff990 [ 7340.441943] RBP: 00007ffc6ebfa7a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff [ 7340.442824] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 7340.443707] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f415bfff990 R15: 00007f415bfff6c0 [ 7340.444586] </TASK> [ 7340.444922] Modules linked in: rfkill intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common skx_edac_common nfit libnvdimm kvm_intel vfat fat kvm snd_pcm irqbypass rapl iTCO_wdt snd_timer intel_pmc_bxt iTCO_vendor_support snd ixgbevf virtio_net soundcore i2c_i801 pcspkr libeth_xdp net_failover i2c_smbus lpc_ich failover libeth virtio_balloon joydev 9p fuse loop zram lz4hc_compress lz4_compress 9pnet_virtio 9pnet netfs ghash_clmulni_intel serio_raw qemu_fw_cfg [ 7340.449650] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The issue can be fixed in all in-tree drivers, but we cannot just trust OOT drivers to not do this. Therefore, make tailroom a signed int and produce a warning when it is negative to prevent such mistakes in the future. Fixes: bf25146a5595 ("bpf: add frags support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API") Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260305111253.2317394-10-larysa.zaremba@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2@huawei.com> --- net/core/filter.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 4c5dd7b53919..062c70c6c7da 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -4134,13 +4134,14 @@ static int bpf_xdp_frags_increase_tail(struct xdp_buff *xdp, int offset) struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp); skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags - 1]; struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq = xdp->rxq; - unsigned int tailroom; + int tailroom; if (!rxq->frag_size || rxq->frag_size > xdp->frame_sz) return -EOPNOTSUPP; tailroom = rxq->frag_size - skb_frag_size(frag) - skb_frag_off(frag) % rxq->frag_size; + WARN_ON_ONCE(tailroom < 0); if (unlikely(offset > tailroom)) return -EINVAL; -- 2.25.1
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://atomgit.com/openeuler/kernel/merge_requests/21610 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/LUK... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://atomgit.com/openeuler/kernel/merge_requests/21610 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/LUK...
participants (2)
-
Dong Chenchen -
patchwork bot