From: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> When building with C=1 W=1 (and when CONFIG_MICROCODE_AMD=n, as Luc Van Oostenryck correctly points out) both sparse and gcc complain: CHECK arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c ./arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h:56:6: warning: symbol \ 'reload_ucode_amd' was not declared. Should it be static? CC arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.o In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c:36: ./arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h:56:6: warning: no previous \ prototype for 'reload_ucode_amd' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 56 | void reload_ucode_amd(void) {} | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ And they're right - that function can be a static inline like its brethren. Signed-off-by: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/52170.1575603873@turing-police --- arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h index 209492849566..6685e1218959 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h @@ -53,6 +53,6 @@ static inline void __init load_ucode_amd_bsp(unsigned int family) {} static inline void load_ucode_amd_ap(unsigned int family) {} static inline int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(unsigned int family) { return -EINVAL; } -void reload_ucode_amd(void) {} +static inline void reload_ucode_amd(void) {} #endif #endif /* _ASM_X86_MICROCODE_AMD_H */ -- 2.25.1