[PATCH openeuler-1.0-LTS] netfilter: ctnetlink: ensure safe access to master conntrack
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v7.0-rc6 commit bffcaad9afdfe45d7fc777397d3b83c1e3ebffe5 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/14619 CVE: CVE-2026-43116 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- Holding reference on the expectation is not sufficient, the master conntrack object can just go away, making exp->master invalid. To access exp->master safely: - Grab the nf_conntrack_expect_lock, this gets serialized with clean_from_lists() which also holds this lock when the master conntrack goes away. - Hold reference on master conntrack via nf_conntrack_find_get(). Not so easy since the master tuple to look up for the master conntrack is not available in the existing problematic paths. This patch goes for extending the nf_conntrack_expect_lock section to address this issue for simplicity, in the cases that are described below this is just slightly extending the lock section. The add expectation command already holds a reference to the master conntrack from ctnetlink_create_expect(). However, the delete expectation command needs to grab the spinlock before looking up for the expectation. Expand the existing spinlock section to address this to cover the expectation lookup. Note that, the nf_ct_expect_iterate_net() calls already grabs the spinlock while iterating over the expectation table, which is correct. The get expectation command needs to grab the spinlock to ensure master conntrack does not go away. This also expands the existing spinlock section to cover the expectation lookup too. I needed to move the netlink skb allocation out of the spinlock to keep it GFP_KERNEL. For the expectation events, the IPEXP_DESTROY event is already delivered under the spinlock, just move the delivery of IPEXP_NEW under the spinlock too because the master conntrack event cache is reached through exp->master. While at it, add lockdep notations to help identify what codepaths need to grab the spinlock. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> --- include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h | 5 ++++ net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c | 2 ++ net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c | 10 +++++++- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 30 +++++++++++++++-------- 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h index 4e3fff9f929b..7e12d5b27249 100644 --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h @@ -81,4 +81,9 @@ void nf_conntrack_lock(spinlock_t *lock); extern spinlock_t nf_conntrack_expect_lock; +static inline void lockdep_nfct_expect_lock_held(void) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); +} + #endif /* _NF_CONNTRACK_CORE_H */ diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c index c11822a7d2bf..c8b4c0c15767 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ void nf_ct_expect_event_report(enum ip_conntrack_expect_events event, struct nf_exp_event_notifier *notify; struct nf_conntrack_ecache *e; + lockdep_nfct_expect_lock_held(); + rcu_read_lock(); notify = rcu_dereference(net->ct.nf_expect_event_cb); if (!notify) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c index 27b84231db10..a8dcb4e44d5f 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ void nf_ct_unlink_expect_report(struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp, struct nf_conn_help *master_help = nfct_help(exp->master); struct net *net = nf_ct_exp_net(exp); + lockdep_nfct_expect_lock_held(); WARN_ON(!master_help); WARN_ON(timer_pending(&exp->timeout)); @@ -105,6 +106,8 @@ nf_ct_exp_equal(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple, bool nf_ct_remove_expect(struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp) { + lockdep_nfct_expect_lock_held(); + if (del_timer(&exp->timeout)) { nf_ct_unlink_expect(exp); nf_ct_expect_put(exp); @@ -162,6 +165,8 @@ nf_ct_find_expectation(struct net *net, struct nf_conntrack_expect *i, *exp = NULL; unsigned int h; + lockdep_nfct_expect_lock_held(); + if (!net->ct.expect_count) return NULL; @@ -414,6 +419,8 @@ static inline int __nf_ct_expect_check(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect) unsigned int h; int ret = 0; + lockdep_nfct_expect_lock_held(); + if (!master_help) { ret = -ESHUTDOWN; goto out; @@ -467,8 +474,9 @@ int nf_ct_expect_related_report(struct nf_conntrack_expect *expect, nf_ct_expect_insert(expect); - spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); nf_ct_expect_event_report(IPEXP_NEW, expect, portid, report); + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); + return 0; out: spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c index 331839218a1c..203a5d059b20 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c @@ -3056,31 +3056,37 @@ static int ctnetlink_get_expect(struct net *net, struct sock *ctnl, if (err < 0) return err; + err = -ENOMEM; + skb2 = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!skb2) + return -ENOMEM; + + spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); exp = nf_ct_expect_find_get(net, &zone, &tuple); - if (!exp) + if (!exp) { + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); + kfree_skb(skb2); return -ENOENT; + } if (cda[CTA_EXPECT_ID]) { __be32 id = nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_EXPECT_ID]); if (id != nf_expect_get_id(exp)) { nf_ct_expect_put(exp); + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); + kfree_skb(skb2); return -ENOENT; } } - err = -ENOMEM; - skb2 = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); - if (skb2 == NULL) { - nf_ct_expect_put(exp); - goto out; - } - rcu_read_lock(); err = ctnetlink_exp_fill_info(skb2, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid, nlh->nlmsg_seq, IPCTNL_MSG_EXP_NEW, exp); rcu_read_unlock(); nf_ct_expect_put(exp); + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); + if (err <= 0) goto free; @@ -3135,22 +3141,26 @@ static int ctnetlink_del_expect(struct net *net, struct sock *ctnl, if (err < 0) return err; + spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); + /* bump usage count to 2 */ exp = nf_ct_expect_find_get(net, &zone, &tuple); - if (!exp) + if (!exp) { + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); return -ENOENT; + } if (cda[CTA_EXPECT_ID]) { __be32 id = nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_EXPECT_ID]); if (id != nf_expect_get_id(exp)) { nf_ct_expect_put(exp); + spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); return -ENOENT; } } /* after list removal, usage count == 1 */ - spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock); if (del_timer(&exp->timeout)) { nf_ct_unlink_expect_report(exp, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid, nlmsg_report(nlh)); -- 2.43.0
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,转换为PR失败! 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/OSY... 失败原因:补丁/补丁集的标题分支与仓库分支列表不匹配 建议解决方法:请确认补丁标题中的分支是否正确,若有误则修改,无则忽略 FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org has been converted to PR failed! Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/OSY... Failed Reason: branch in patch(es)'s title can not match any branches in repository's branch list Suggest Solution: please checkout if the patch(es)'s branch in title is wrong and fix it, if not ignore this
participants (2)
-
patchwork bot -
superdcc97@163.com