[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/2] can: raw: fix receiver memory leak
Backport can/raw receiver memory leak fix commits. Eric Dumazet (1): can: raw: fix lockdep issue in raw_release() Ziyang Xuan (1): can: raw: fix receiver memory leak net/can/raw.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1
mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.5-rc3 commit ee8b94c8510ce64afe0b87ef548d23e00915fb10 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I7PM10 CVE: NA Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... --------------------------- Got kmemleak errors with the following ltp can_filter testcase: for ((i=1; i<=100; i++)) do ./can_filter & sleep 0.1 done ============================================================== [<00000000db4a4943>] can_rx_register+0x147/0x360 [can] [<00000000a289549d>] raw_setsockopt+0x5ef/0x853 [can_raw] [<000000006d3d9ebd>] __sys_setsockopt+0x173/0x2c0 [<00000000407dbfec>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x61/0x70 [<00000000fd468496>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [<00000000b7e47d51>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6 It's a bug in the concurrent scenario of unregister_netdevice_many() and raw_release() as following: cpu0 cpu1 unregister_netdevice_many(can_dev) unlist_netdevice(can_dev) // dev_get_by_index() return NULL after this net_set_todo(can_dev) raw_release(can_socket) dev = dev_get_by_index(, ro->ifindex); // dev == NULL if (dev) { // receivers in dev_rcv_lists not free because dev is NULL raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); dev_put(dev); } ... ro->bound = 0; ... call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, ) raw_notify(, NETDEV_UNREGISTER, ) if (ro->bound) // invalid because ro->bound has been set 0 raw_disable_allfilters(, dev, ); // receivers in dev_rcv_lists will never be freed Add a net_device pointer member in struct raw_sock to record bound can_dev, and use rtnl_lock to serialize raw_socket members between raw_bind(), raw_release(), raw_setsockopt() and raw_notify(). Use ro->dev to decide whether to free receivers in dev_rcv_lists. Fixes: 8d0caedb7596 ("can: bcm/raw/isotp: use per module netdevice notifier") Reviewed-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230711011737.1969582-1-william.xuanziyang@huaw... Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Conflicts: net/can/raw.c Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com> --- net/can/raw.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index 6963293e59fd..84f90aa8f31e 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct raw_sock { struct sock sk; int bound; int ifindex; + struct net_device *dev; struct list_head notifier; int loopback; int recv_own_msgs; @@ -278,7 +279,7 @@ static void raw_notify(struct raw_sock *ro, unsigned long msg, if (!net_eq(dev_net(dev), sock_net(sk))) return; - if (ro->ifindex != dev->ifindex) + if (ro->dev != dev) return; switch (msg) { @@ -293,8 +294,9 @@ static void raw_notify(struct raw_sock *ro, unsigned long msg, kfree(ro->filter); ro->ifindex = 0; - ro->bound = 0; - ro->count = 0; + ro->bound = 0; + ro->dev = NULL; + ro->count = 0; release_sock(sk); sk->sk_err = ENODEV; @@ -339,6 +341,7 @@ static int raw_init(struct sock *sk) ro->bound = 0; ro->ifindex = 0; + ro->dev = NULL; /* set default filter to single entry dfilter */ ro->dfilter.can_id = 0; @@ -386,17 +389,12 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock) lock_sock(sk); + rtnl_lock(); /* remove current filters & unregister */ if (ro->bound) { - if (ro->ifindex) { - struct net_device *dev; - - dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); - if (dev) { - raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(dev), dev, sk); - dev_put(dev); - } - } else + if (ro->dev) + raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(ro->dev), ro->dev, sk); + else raw_disable_allfilters(sock_net(sk), NULL, sk); } @@ -404,9 +402,11 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock) kfree(ro->filter); ro->ifindex = 0; - ro->bound = 0; - ro->count = 0; + ro->bound = 0; + ro->dev = NULL; + ro->count = 0; free_percpu(ro->uniq); + rtnl_unlock(); sock_orphan(sk); sock->sk = NULL; @@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len) struct sockaddr_can *addr = (struct sockaddr_can *)uaddr; struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct raw_sock *ro = raw_sk(sk); + struct net_device *dev = NULL; int ifindex; int err = 0; int notify_enetdown = 0; @@ -431,14 +432,13 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len) if (addr->can_family != AF_CAN) return -EINVAL; + rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk); if (ro->bound && addr->can_ifindex == ro->ifindex) goto out; if (addr->can_ifindex) { - struct net_device *dev; - dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), addr->can_ifindex); if (!dev) { err = -ENODEV; @@ -467,25 +467,20 @@ static int raw_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len) if (!err) { if (ro->bound) { /* unregister old filters */ - if (ro->ifindex) { - struct net_device *dev; - - dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), - ro->ifindex); - if (dev) { - raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(dev), - dev, sk); - dev_put(dev); - } - } else + if (ro->dev) + raw_disable_allfilters(dev_net(ro->dev), + ro->dev, sk); + else raw_disable_allfilters(sock_net(sk), NULL, sk); } ro->ifindex = ifindex; ro->bound = 1; + ro->dev = dev; } out: release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock(); if (notify_enetdown) { sk->sk_err = ENETDOWN; @@ -552,9 +547,9 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk); - if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { - dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); - if (!dev) { + dev = ro->dev; + if (ro->bound && dev) { + if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) { if (count > 1) kfree(filter); err = -ENODEV; @@ -595,9 +590,6 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, ro->count = count; out_fil: - if (dev) - dev_put(dev); - release_sock(sk); rtnl_unlock(); @@ -615,9 +607,9 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk); - if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { - dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); - if (!dev) { + dev = ro->dev; + if (ro->bound && dev) { + if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) { err = -ENODEV; goto out_err; } @@ -641,9 +633,6 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, ro->err_mask = err_mask; out_err: - if (dev) - dev_put(dev); - release_sock(sk); rtnl_unlock(); -- 2.25.1
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.5-rc4 commit 11c9027c983e9e4b408ee5613b6504d24ebd85be category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I7PM10 CVE: NA Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... --------------------------- syzbot complained about a lockdep issue [1] Since raw_bind() and raw_setsockopt() first get RTNL before locking the socket, we must adopt the same order in raw_release() [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc1-syzkaller-00192-g78adb4bcf99e #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.0/14110 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88804e4b6130 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline] ffff88804e4b6130 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8e3df368 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: raw_bind+0xa7/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:434 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x181/0x1340 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 raw_release+0x1c6/0x9b0 net/can/raw.c:391 __sock_release+0xcd/0x290 net/socket.c:654 sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1386 __fput+0x3fd/0xac0 fs/file_table.c:384 task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:179 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:49 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:171 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x210/0x240 kernel/entry/common.c:204 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:286 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:297 do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_CAN){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3492 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline] raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435 __sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 net/socket.c:1792 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1803 [inline] __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1801 [inline] __x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1801 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(sk_lock-AF_CAN); lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(sk_lock-AF_CAN); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.0/14110: stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 14110 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-syzkaller-00192-g78adb4bcf99e #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/03/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x311/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726 lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3492 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1708 [inline] raw_bind+0xb1/0xab0 net/can/raw.c:435 __sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 net/socket.c:1792 __do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1803 [inline] __se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1801 [inline] __x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 net/socket.c:1801 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7fd89007cb29 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fd890d2a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd89019bf80 RCX: 00007fd89007cb29 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fd8900c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fd89019bf80 R15: 00007ffebf8124f8 </TASK> Fixes: ee8b94c8510c ("can: raw: fix receiver memory leak") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com> Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230720114438.172434-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com> --- net/can/raw.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index 84f90aa8f31e..26934174cd42 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -387,9 +387,9 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock) list_del(&ro->notifier); spin_unlock(&raw_notifier_lock); + rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk); - rtnl_lock(); /* remove current filters & unregister */ if (ro->bound) { if (ro->dev) @@ -406,12 +406,13 @@ static int raw_release(struct socket *sock) ro->dev = NULL; ro->count = 0; free_percpu(ro->uniq); - rtnl_unlock(); sock_orphan(sk); sock->sk = NULL; release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock(); + sock_put(sk); return 0; -- 2.25.1
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/1629 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/P... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/1629 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/P...
participants (2)
-
patchwork bot -
Ziyang Xuan