[PATCH OLK-6.6] locking/rtmutex: Skip remove_waiter() when waiter is not enqueued
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> mainline inclusion from mainline-v7.1-rc7 commit 40a25d59e85b3c8709ac2424d44f65610467871e category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/15848 CVE: CVE-2026-53163 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- syzbot triggered the following splat in remove_waiter() via FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000a88-0x0000000000000a8f] class_raw_spinlock_constructor remove_waiter+0x159/0x1200 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1561 rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x103/0x120 futex_requeue+0x10e4/0x20d0 __x64_sys_futex+0x34f/0x4d0 task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() does not arm the waiter upon deadlock detection, leaving waiter->task nil, where 3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()") made this fatal. Furthermore, rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() should not be calling into remove_waiter() upon a successfully grabbing the rtmutex. 1a1fb985f2e2 ("futex: Handle early deadlock return correctly"), moved the remove_waiter() out of __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() (where 'ret' was only ever 0 or < 0) into the wrapper. Tighten this check to account for try_to_take_rt_mutex(). Fixes: 3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()") Reported-by: syzbot+78147abe6c524f183ee9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69f114ac.050a0220.ac8b.0003.GAE@google.com/ Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260507112913.1019537-1-dave@stgolabs.net Conflicts: kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c [context conflicts.] Signed-off-by: Jiacheng Yu <yujiacheng3@huawei.com> --- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 3 +++ kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index def1f8fbc85c..6df2f674712a 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -1524,6 +1524,9 @@ static void __sched remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); + if (!waiter_task) /* never enqueued */ + return; + scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, &waiter_task->pi_lock) { rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); waiter_task->pi_blocked_on = NULL; diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c index d0433287effd..74b24ecdbeea 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task); - if (unlikely(ret)) + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) remove_waiter(lock, waiter); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); -- 2.34.1
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://atomgit.com/openeuler/kernel/merge_requests/24648 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/PQV... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://atomgit.com/openeuler/kernel/merge_requests/24648 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/PQV...
participants (2)
-
Jiacheng Yu -
patchwork bot