[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] mm: swap: fix race between free_swap_and_cache() and swapoff()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84909/84909fc46b87d1a7201fe8fbd9ef49bff8885c14" alt=""
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.215 commit d85c11c97ecf92d47a4b29e3faca714dc1f18d0d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L4RJ CVE: CVE-2024-26960 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 82b1c07a0af603e3c47b906c8e991dc96f01688e ] There was previously a theoretical window where swapoff() could run and teardown a swap_info_struct while a call to free_swap_and_cache() was running in another thread. This could cause, amongst other bad possibilities, swap_page_trans_huge_swapped() (called by free_swap_and_cache()) to access the freed memory for swap_map. This is a theoretical problem and I haven't been able to provoke it from a test case. But there has been agreement based on code review that this is possible (see link below). Fix it by using get_swap_device()/put_swap_device(), which will stall swapoff(). There was an extra check in _swap_info_get() to confirm that the swap entry was not free. This isn't present in get_swap_device() because it doesn't make sense in general due to the race between getting the reference and swapoff. So I've added an equivalent check directly in free_swap_and_cache(). Details of how to provoke one possible issue (thanks to David Hildenbrand for deriving this): --8<----- __swap_entry_free() might be the last user and result in "count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE". swapoff->try_to_unuse() will stop as soon as soon as si->inuse_pages==0. So the question is: could someone reclaim the folio and turn si->inuse_pages==0, before we completed swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(). Imagine the following: 2 MiB folio in the swapcache. Only 2 subpages are still references by swap entries. Process 1 still references subpage 0 via swap entry. Process 2 still references subpage 1 via swap entry. Process 1 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache(). -> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE [then, preempted in the hypervisor etc.] Process 2 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache(). -> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE Process 2 goes ahead, passes swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(), and calls __try_to_reclaim_swap(). __try_to_reclaim_swap()->folio_free_swap()->delete_from_swap_cache()-> put_swap_folio()->free_swap_slot()->swapcache_free_entries()-> swap_entry_free()->swap_range_free()-> ... WRITE_ONCE(si->inuse_pages, si->inuse_pages - nr_entries); What stops swapoff to succeed after process 2 reclaimed the swap cache but before process1 finished its call to swap_page_trans_huge_swapped()? --8<----- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306140356.3974886-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com Fixes: 7c00bafee87c ("mm/swap: free swap slots in batch") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/65a66eb9-41f8-4790-8db2-0c70ea15979f@redhat... Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com> --- mm/swapfile.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c index a10c67728e46..2f8a099f014b 100644 --- a/mm/swapfile.c +++ b/mm/swapfile.c @@ -1373,6 +1373,11 @@ static unsigned char __swap_entry_free_locked(struct swap_info_struct *p, } /* + * Note that when only holding the PTL, swapoff might succeed immediately + * after freeing a swap entry. Therefore, immediately after + * __swap_entry_free(), the swap info might become stale and should not + * be touched without a prior get_swap_device(). + * * Check whether swap entry is valid in the swap device. If so, * return pointer to swap_info_struct, and keep the swap entry valid * via preventing the swap device from being swapoff, until @@ -1899,13 +1904,19 @@ int free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t entry) if (non_swap_entry(entry)) return 1; - p = _swap_info_get(entry); + p = get_swap_device(entry); if (p) { + if (WARN_ON(data_race(!p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)]))) { + put_swap_device(p); + return 0; + } + count = __swap_entry_free(p, entry); if (count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE && !swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(p, entry)) __try_to_reclaim_swap(p, swp_offset(entry), TTRS_UNMAPPED | TTRS_FULL); + put_swap_device(p); } return p != NULL; } -- 2.25.1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c7bb/1c7bbbce420c9fc3862fcea0bdd59ff721d5d932" alt=""
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/9132 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/R... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/9132 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/R...
participants (2)
-
Jinjiang Tu
-
patchwork bot