[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/2] CVE-2022-49769

CVE-2022-49769 Anant Thazhemadam (1): gfs2: add validation checks for size of superblock Andrew Price (1): gfs2: Check sb_bsize_shift after reading superblock fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

From: Anant Thazhemadam <anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.155 commit 6a253f385a2dc9f6a5a1da828e0e9e07f6f9d9b9 category: bugfix bugzilla: 190603 CVE: CVE-2022-49769 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 0ddc5154b24c96f20e94d653b0a814438de6032b ] In gfs2_check_sb(), no validation checks are performed with regards to the size of the superblock. syzkaller detected a slab-out-of-bounds bug that was primarily caused because the block size for a superblock was set to zero. A valid size for a superblock is a power of 2 between 512 and PAGE_SIZE. Performing validation checks and ensuring that the size of the superblock is valid fixes this bug. Reported-by: syzbot+af90d47a37376844e731@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+af90d47a37376844e731@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Suggested-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anant Thazhemadam <anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com> [Minor code reordering.] Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Kai <liukai284@huawei.com> --- fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c index b041cb8ae383..ceecb4d82aef 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c @@ -161,15 +161,19 @@ static int gfs2_check_sb(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, int silent) return -EINVAL; } - /* If format numbers match exactly, we're done. */ - - if (sb->sb_fs_format == GFS2_FORMAT_FS && - sb->sb_multihost_format == GFS2_FORMAT_MULTI) - return 0; + if (sb->sb_fs_format != GFS2_FORMAT_FS || + sb->sb_multihost_format != GFS2_FORMAT_MULTI) { + fs_warn(sdp, "Unknown on-disk format, unable to mount\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } - fs_warn(sdp, "Unknown on-disk format, unable to mount\n"); + if (sb->sb_bsize < 512 || sb->sb_bsize > PAGE_SIZE || + (sb->sb_bsize & (sb->sb_bsize - 1))) { + pr_warn("Invalid superblock size\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } - return -EINVAL; + return 0; } static void end_bio_io_page(struct bio *bio) -- 2.34.1

From: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.267 commit 15c83fa0fd659dd9fbdc940a560b61236e876a80 category: bugfix bugzilla: 190603 CVE: CVE-2022-49769 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=... -------------------------------- commit 670f8ce56dd0632dc29a0322e188cc73ce3c6b92 upstream. Fuzzers like to scribble over sb_bsize_shift but in reality it's very unlikely that this field would be corrupted on its own. Nevertheless it should be checked to avoid the possibility of messy mount errors due to bad calculations. It's always a fixed value based on the block size so we can just check that it's the expected value. Tested with: mkfs.gfs2 -O -p lock_nolock /dev/vdb for i in 0 -1 64 65 32 33; do gfs2_edit -p sb field sb_bsize_shift $i /dev/vdb mount /dev/vdb /mnt/test && umount /mnt/test done Before this patch we get a withdraw after [ 76.413681] gfs2: fsid=loop0.0: fatal: invalid metadata block [ 76.413681] bh = 19 (type: exp=5, found=4) [ 76.413681] function = gfs2_meta_buffer, file = fs/gfs2/meta_io.c, line = 492 and with UBSAN configured we also get complaints like [ 76.373395] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:295:19 [ 76.373815] shift exponent 4294967287 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' After the patch, these complaints don't appear, mount fails immediately and we get an explanation in dmesg. Reported-by: syzbot+dcf33a7aae997956fe06@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Kai <liukai284@huawei.com> --- fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c index ceecb4d82aef..bf7de0e8a1b0 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c @@ -172,7 +172,10 @@ static int gfs2_check_sb(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, int silent) pr_warn("Invalid superblock size\n"); return -EINVAL; } - + if (sb->sb_bsize_shift != ffs(sb->sb_bsize) - 1) { + pr_warn("Invalid block size shift\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } return 0; } -- 2.34.1

反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/16303 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/TA5... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/16303 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/archives/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/TA5...
participants (2)
-
Liu Kai
-
patchwork bot