From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.15-rc1 commit bbbc02b7445ebfda13e4847f4f1413c6480a85a9 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/ICGAG5 CVE: CVE-2025-38060 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- The bpf_verifier_state.loop_entry state should be copied by copy_verifier_state(). Otherwise, .loop_entry values from unrelated states would poison env->cur_state. Additionally, env->stack should not contain any states with .loop_entry != NULL. The states in env->stack are yet to be verified, while .loop_entry is set for states that reached an equivalent state. This means that env->cur_state->loop_entry should always be NULL after pop_stack(). See the selftest in the next commit for an example of the program that is not safe yet is accepted by verifier w/o this fix. This change has some verification performance impact for selftests: File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) ---------------------------------- ---------------------------- --------- --------- -------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- arena_htab.bpf.o arena_htab_llvm 717 426 -291 (-40.59%) 57 37 -20 (-35.09%) arena_htab_asm.bpf.o arena_htab_asm 597 445 -152 (-25.46%) 47 37 -10 (-21.28%) arena_list.bpf.o arena_list_del 309 279 -30 (-9.71%) 23 14 -9 (-39.13%) iters.bpf.o iter_subprog_check_stacksafe 155 141 -14 (-9.03%) 15 14 -1 (-6.67%) iters.bpf.o iter_subprog_iters 1094 1003 -91 (-8.32%) 88 83 -5 (-5.68%) iters.bpf.o loop_state_deps2 479 725 +246 (+51.36%) 46 63 +17 (+36.96%) kmem_cache_iter.bpf.o open_coded_iter 63 59 -4 (-6.35%) 7 6 -1 (-14.29%) verifier_bits_iter.bpf.o max_words 92 84 -8 (-8.70%) 8 7 -1 (-12.50%) verifier_iterating_callbacks.bpf.o cond_break2 113 107 -6 (-5.31%) 12 12 +0 (+0.00%) And significant negative impact for sched_ext: File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) ----------------- ---------------------- --------- --------- -------------------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ bpf.bpf.o lavd_init 7039 14723 +7684 (+109.16%) 490 1139 +649 (+132.45%) bpf.bpf.o layered_dispatch 11485 10548 -937 (-8.16%) 848 762 -86 (-10.14%) bpf.bpf.o layered_dump 7422 1000001 +992579 (+13373.47%) 681 31178 +30497 (+4478.27%) bpf.bpf.o layered_enqueue 16854 71127 +54273 (+322.02%) 1611 6450 +4839 (+300.37%) bpf.bpf.o p2dq_dispatch 665 791 +126 (+18.95%) 68 78 +10 (+14.71%) bpf.bpf.o p2dq_init 2343 2980 +637 (+27.19%) 201 237 +36 (+17.91%) bpf.bpf.o refresh_layer_cpumasks 16487 674760 +658273 (+3992.68%) 1770 65370 +63600 (+3593.22%) bpf.bpf.o rusty_select_cpu 1937 40872 +38935 (+2010.07%) 177 3210 +3033 (+1713.56%) scx_central.bpf.o central_dispatch 636 2687 +2051 (+322.48%) 63 227 +164 (+260.32%) scx_nest.bpf.o nest_init 636 815 +179 (+28.14%) 60 73 +13 (+21.67%) scx_qmap.bpf.o qmap_dispatch 2393 3580 +1187 (+49.60%) 196 253 +57 (+29.08%) scx_qmap.bpf.o qmap_dump 233 318 +85 (+36.48%) 22 30 +8 (+36.36%) scx_qmap.bpf.o qmap_init 16367 17436 +1069 (+6.53%) 603 669 +66 (+10.95%) Note 'layered_dump' program, which now hits 1M instructions limit. This impact would be mitigated in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250215110411.3236773-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Conflicts: kernel/bpf/verifier.c [The conflicts were due to some minor issue.] Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Zhang <zhangxiaomeng13@huawei.com> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 8d56fce24713..993c263546ac 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1792,6 +1792,7 @@ static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state, dst_state->dfs_depth = src->dfs_depth; dst_state->callback_unroll_depth = src->callback_unroll_depth; dst_state->used_as_loop_entry = src->used_as_loop_entry; + dst_state->loop_entry = src->loop_entry; for (i = 0; i <= src->curframe; i++) { dst = dst_state->frame[i]; if (!dst) { @@ -17380,6 +17381,8 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return err; break; } else { + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(env->cur_state->loop_entry)) + env->cur_state->loop_entry = NULL; do_print_state = true; continue; } -- 2.34.1